oceanic rocks
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

42
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 411
Author(s):  
Paola Tartarotti ◽  
Silvana Martin ◽  
Andrea Festa ◽  
Gianni Balestro

Ophiolites of the Alpine belt derive from the closure of the Mesozoic Tethys Ocean that was interposed between the palaeo-Europe and palaeo-Adria continental plates. The Alpine orogeny has intensely reworked the oceanic rocks into metaophiolites with various metamorphic imprints. In the Western Alps, metaophiolites and continental-derived units are distributed within two paired bands: An inner band where Alpine subduction-related high-pressure (HP) metamorphism is preserved, and an outer band where blueschist to greenschist facies recrystallisation due to the decompression path prevails. The metaophiolites of the inner band are hugely important not just because they provide records of the prograde tectonic and metamorphic evolution of the Western Alps, but also because they retain the signature of the intra-oceanic tectono-sedimentary evolution. Lithostratigraphic and petrographic criteria applied to metasediments associated with HP metaophiolites reveal the occurrence of distinct tectono-stratigraphic successions including quartzites with marbles, chaotic rock units, and layered calc schists. These successions, although sliced, deformed, and superposed in complex ways during the orogenic stage, preserve remnants of their primary depositional setting constraining the pre-orogenic evolution of the Jurassic Tethys Ocean.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Pastor-Galán ◽  
Tatsuki Tsujimori ◽  
Alicia López-Carmona ◽  
Keewook Yi

<p>During the amalgamation, tenure and break up of Pangea several oceans played a major tectonic role. Remnants of them now occur mostly along the margins of the Atlantic, Mediterranean, Black and Caspian seas, as well as in the Alpine-Himalayan and adjacent orogens. Of those oceans, three (Iapetus, Tornsquist and Rheic) were closed during the amalgamation of Pangea and another (Neo-Tethys) is the main witness of its break-up.</p><p>The Paleotethys is the enigmatic ocean that shared an internal position during most of Pangea’s tenure. There is no consensus about its origin, some suggest that opened during the latest stages of Pangea’s amalgamation (Devonian-Carboniferous) whereas others considert it a remnant of the mostly subducted Rheic ocean after Gondwana-Laurussia collision. The Shanderman eclogites, in NW Iran are a potential candidate to represent the Paleotethys ocean. They are metamorphosed oceanic rocks (protolith oceanic tholeiitic basalt with MORB composition). Eclogite occurs within a serpentinite matrix, accompanied by mafic rocks resembling a dismembered ophiolite. The eclogitic mafic rocks record different stages of metamorphism during subduction and exhumation.</p><p>In this contribution I will show the new petrological, geochemical and geochronological results from this eclogites to shed light on the Paleotethyan problem. The piece of oceanic crust preserved at Shanderman area (Iran) crystallized some time in the mid-Carboniferous (~330 Ma) showing the paleotethys kept expanding during the Gondwana-Laurussia collisions that amalgamated Pangea. Metamorphic ages, suggest that subdution initiated in this segment of the Paleotethys between 310 and 290Ma. We integrate this results into a tectonic reconstruction that shows a major plate reorganization within Pangea during the late Carboniferous and early Permian (320-270 Ma) that questions its role as a supercontinent.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 464-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Mechati ◽  
Renaud Caby ◽  
Dalila Hammor ◽  
Delphine Bosch ◽  
Olivier Bruguier ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 759-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Kostitsyn ◽  
E. A. Belousova ◽  
S. A. Silant’ev ◽  
N. S. Bortnikov ◽  
M. O. Anosova
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 1107-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen F. von Raumer ◽  
Gérard M. Stampfli ◽  
Ricardo Arenas ◽  
Sonia Sánchez Martínez

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Krill

Two papers, ‘Gondwana land bridges’ by Charles Schuchert and ‘Isthmian links’ by Bailey Willis, were published together in 1932. They were apparently motivated by Schuchert's desire to defend his paleogeography of fixed continents against the threat of Alfred Wegener's continental mobilism. Schuchert and Willis both held to land-bridge theory but admitted that they could not accept each other's types of bridges. Schuchert insisted that some bridges had to be wide and of continental material, without explaining why he felt this was so. Willis insisted that wide continental bridges were isostatically and volumetrically impossible; so any ancient bridges that had sunk must have been narrow isthmuses of dense oceanic rocks. They wrote separate papers, but issued together, perhaps to lead readers to the impression that a compromise was possible; but it was not. They avoided alerting readers to fatal flaws in both their models, in part by limiting their discussion to the less familiar southern hemisphere (Gondwana) and never mentioning the continental connection between Europe and North America. Willis went further in his inventions than Schuchert, trying to explain the extremes of Permian climate. Fixed-continent paleogeography required glacial conditions at equatorial latitudes and tropical conditions at arctic latitudes. We now understand that these climate differences can only be explained by ‘continental drift’ (or plate tectonics), but in his valiant effort to support fixism, Willis postulated not only tectonic uplifts of oceanic isthmuses, but also uplifts in continental areas that were known to be stable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document