oestrogen supplementation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e025141
Author(s):  
Tina Sara Verghese ◽  
Lee Middleton ◽  
Versha Cheed ◽  
Lisa Leighton ◽  
Jane Daniels ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.Design and settingA randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urogynaecology centres (July 2015–August 2016).ParticipantsPostmenopausal women with POP opting for surgery, unless involving mesh or for recurrent POP in same compartment.InterventionWomen were randomised (1:1) to preoperative and postoperative oestrogen or no treatment. Oestrogen treatment (oestradiol hemihydrate 10 μg vaginal pessaries) commenced 6 weeks prior to surgery (once daily for 2 weeks, twice weekly for 4 weeks) and twice weekly for 26 weeks from 6 weeks postsurgery.Outcome measuresThe main outcomes were assessment of eligibility and recruitment rates along with compliance and data completion. To obtain estimates for important aspects of the protocol to allow development of a definitive trial.Results325 women seeking POP surgery were screened over 13 months and 157 (48%) were eligible. Of these, 100 (64%) were randomised, 50 to oestrogen and 50 to no oestrogen treatment, with 89 (44/45 respectively) ultimately having surgery. Of these, 89% (79/89) returned complete questionnaires at 6 months and 78% (32/41) reported good compliance with oestrogen. No serious adverse events were attributable to oestrogen use.ConclusionsA large multicentre RCT of oestrogen versus no treatment is feasible, as it is possible to randomise and follow up participants with high fidelity. Four predefined feasibility criteria were met. Compliance with treatment regimens is not a barrier. A larger trial is required to definitively address the role of perioperative oestrogen supplementation.Trial registration numberISRCTN46661996.


2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wellerson Rodrigo Scarano ◽  
Daniel Emídio De Sousa ◽  
Silvana Gisele Pegorin Campos ◽  
Lara Silvia Corradi ◽  
Patricia Simone Leite Vilamaior ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 745-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Komesaroff ◽  
Meryl Fullerton ◽  
Murray D. Esler ◽  
Garry Jennings ◽  
Krishnankutty Sudhir

1999 ◽  
Vol 55 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 255-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.H.J Burne ◽  
P.J.E Murfitt ◽  
J.A Goode ◽  
M.I Boulton ◽  
C.L Gilbert

Cephalalgia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (20_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Granella ◽  
G Sances ◽  
G Messa ◽  
M De Marinis ◽  
Gc Manzoni

Because of its pathophysiological and clinical peculiarities, true menstrual migraine (MM) (i.e. migraine starting exclusively between the days immediately before and immediately after the first day of the menstrual cycle) requires an ad hoc management different from that of other migraines. The paucity of well-conducted, controlled clinical trials and the lack of a universally accepted definition of MM have meant that the treatment of MM is still largely empirical. In our clinical practice, we adopt a sequential therapeutic approach, including the following steps: (i) acute attack drugs (sumatriptan, ergot derivatives, NSAIDs); (ii) intermittent prophylaxis with ergot derivatives or NSAIDs; (iii) oestrogen supplementation with percutaneous or transdermal oestradiol (100 Lig patches); (iv) antioestrogen agents (danazol, tamoxifen).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document