field continuation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-32
Author(s):  
A. V. Shalashnikov ◽  
D. B. Finikov ◽  
N. I. Khokhlov ◽  
A. M. Ivanov

The article describes the method of calculating the wave field of reflected waves of a certain type of re-reflection from localized target objects. A special feature of the method is the combination of the wave field continuation operator calculated by means of layer-by-layer recalculation based on the Kirchhoff integral and the finite-difference operator of reflected waves. Parameterization of the wave field continuation operator type is determined on the basis of the frame effective depth-velocity model. The research is carried out by Seismotech, Ltd under the grant support of "Skolkovo" Foundation.


Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. J9-J25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Pilkington ◽  
Olivier Boulanger

The continuation of potential field data from one irregular surface to another, not always horizontal, is often a necessary component within the data processing and interpretation stream. The most common requirement is to reduce field values (or some related component or derivative) to a horizontal plane, to facilitate further quantitative processing. Methods available to continue data comprise two main approaches. The first (source-based) involves calculating a source distribution that produces a fit to the data and can be used to calculate the field at any other point above. The second (field-based) requires no source determinations and deals with only fields but may involve calculating the field on some intermediate surface. Nine different continuation methods were compared (four source based and five field based) through synthetic tests and on real data from a helicopter-borne survey in Yukon, Canada. The preferred methods of Guspi and Hansen are those that do not involve any theoretical or geometric approximations and involve intermediate calculations on a plane or surface close to the observation surface. The Guspi approach is faster, based on using frequency-domain processing, but the Hansen method uses equivalent sources close enough to and consistently below the observation surface so that no low-pass filtering needs to be used.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Zhanyi ◽  
Liu Liping* ◽  
Shang Xinmin ◽  
Hu Xiaoting ◽  
Pan Shunlin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document