polyarticular disease
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

21
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Tucker ◽  
Philip Helliwell ◽  
Laura Coates ◽  

Abstract Background/Aims  Multiple composite measures of disease activity are available and used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) research; however, poor agreement remains amongst clinicians on the optimal measure of disease activity. Research to date has focused on polyarticular PsA, despite oligoarticular disease accounting for around half of cases in clinical practice. We aim to compare the ability of Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), Disease Activity score for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), GRAppa Composite scorE (GRACE) and Disease Activity Score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP) to assess disease activity and predict treatment change, amongst usual care patients with oligoarticular and polyarticular psoriatic disease. Methods  The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Composite Exercise (GRACE) dataset was utilised. Oligoarthritis was defined as < 5 active joints. Reference measures were clinician and patient opinions on disease control and whether treatment was escalated. Patients with baseline data for all composite measures were included. The ability of each composite measure to predict treatment change and capture disease activity was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results  Data were available for 271 patients (152 oligoarthritis, 119 polyarthritis). The mean age, duration of PsA and psoriasis were similar for both groups. A higher proportion of oligoarticular patients were male. Patients with polyarticular disease had higher disease activity in skin, enthesitis and dactylitis. Using both patient and physician definitions of disease control, all composite measures were able to differentiate between patients with active and quiescent disease, regardless of disease subtype (p < 0.05). PASDAS demonstrated the largest differentiation in score. Differences between active and inactive disease scores were more pronounced in oligoarticular disease. PASDAS demonstrated the greatest ability to predict treatment change in both oligoarticular and polyarticular disease. Interestingly, DAPSA could not predict treatment change in polyarticular patients, p = 0.074 (Table 1). Conclusion  This is the first study to compare composite measures, in oligoarticular and polyarticular PsA in a multinational cohort. All composite measures of disease activity were able to differentiate between active and inactive disease in both subtypes. PASDAS demonstrated the largest discrimination in both polyarticular and oligoarticular disease, suggesting greatest clinical and research utility. Disclosure  L. Tucker: None. P. Helliwell: None. L. Coates: None.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-94
Author(s):  
Stuart B. Goodman

The hip joint is commonly affected in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA), especially in cases of systemic polyarticular disease. Chronic synovitis of the hip leads to joint destruction, therefore, systemic and local control of the disease is of paramount importance. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), biologics, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, and physical therapy are the mainstay for controlling ongoing inflammation and hip joint contractures. Synovectomy with soft tissue releases is useful in the early stages of the disease, when the joint cartilage is largely preserved. Total joint arthroplasty (THA) is successful in relieving pain, and improving function, ambulation and range of motion in end-stage degenerative arthritis. With improved designs of smaller prostheses and modern bearing couples, it is hoped that the longevity of THA will facilitate a more normal and enduring lifestyle.


RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Backström ◽  
Pirjo Tynjälä ◽  
Kristiina Aalto ◽  
Minna-Maija Grönlund ◽  
Heikki Ylijoki ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo validate cut-offs of the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (JADAS10) and clinical JADAS10 (cJADAS10) and to compare them with other patient cohorts.MethodsIn a national multicentre study, cross-sectional data on recent visits of 337 non-systemic patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) were collected from nine paediatric outpatient units. The cut-offs were tested with receiver operating characteristic curve-based methods, and too high, too low and correct classification rates (CCRs) were calculated.ResultsOur earlier presented JADAS10 cut-offs seemed feasible based on the CCRs, but the cut-off values between low disease activity (LDA) and moderate disease activity (MDA) were adjusted. When JADAS10 cut-offs for clinically inactive disease (CID) were increased to 1.5 for patients with oligoarticular disease and 2.7 for patients with polyarticular disease, as recently suggested in a large multinational register study, altogether 11 patients classified as CID by the cut-off had one active joint. We suggest JADAS10 cut-off values for oligoarticular/polyarticular disease to be in CID: 0.0–0.5/0.0–0.7, LDA: 0.6–3.8/0.8–5.1 and MDA: >3.8/5.1. Suitable cJADAS10 cut-offs are the same as JADAS10 cut-offs in oligoarticular disease. In polyarticular disease, cJADAS10 cut-offs are 0–0.7 for CID, 0.8–5.0 for LDA and >5.0 for MDA.ConclusionInternational consensus on JADAS cut-off values is needed, and such a cut-off for CID should preferably exclude patients with active joints in the CID group.


Author(s):  
Ade Adebajo ◽  
Lisa Dunkley

Polyarticular disease is a commonly encountered musculoskeletal problem which regularly confronts clinicians as a diagnostic dilemma. Polyarticular disease is a musculoskeletal presentation in which more than four joints are affected by the disease. The classical rheumatological condition which presents as polyarticular disease is rheumatoid arthritis, although even this condition can very occasionally present with a mono- or oligoarticular onset. Polyarticular disease includes a wide range of musculoskeletal conditions including such disorders as polyarticular gout, the seronegative spondyloarthropathies, rheumatic fever, and systemic lupus erythematosus. This chapter emphasizes how through a careful history, thorough clinical examination and appropriate investigations, a definitive diagnosis can be made in a patient presenting clinically with polyarticular disease. General management principles for patients with polyarticular disease are also provided.


Author(s):  
Alfred A. Cividino MD FRCPC FACR

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic polyarticular disease with systemic consequences leading to impairment and disability. Typical pharmacological treatment consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and leflunomide. When disease activity persists, the next level of treatment is the biologic drugs. Some of these agents have been available since 1999. Currently, there are nine biologic drugs available for the treatment of RA. Some agents such as the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors also have approved indications for psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and inflammatory bowel disease.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amiethab Aiyer ◽  
William Hennrikus ◽  
Jessica Walrath ◽  
Brandt Groh ◽  
Barbara Ostrov

Author(s):  
Ade Adebajo ◽  
Lisa Dunkley

Polyarticular disease is a commonly encountered musculoskeletal problem which regularly confronts clinicians as a diagnostic dilemma. Polyarticular disease is a musculoskeletal presentation in which more than four joints are affected by the disease. The classical rheumatological condition which presents as polyarticular disease is rheumatoid arthritis, although even this condition can very occasionally present with a mono- or oligoarticular onset. Polyarticular disease includes a wide range of musculoskeletal conditions including such disorders as polyarticular gout, the seronegative spondyloarthropathies, rheumatic fever, and systemic lupus erythematosus. This chapter emphasizes how through a careful history, thorough clinical examination and appropriate investigations, a definitive diagnosis can be made in a patient presenting clinically with polyarticular disease. General management principles for patients with polyarticular disease are also provided.


Author(s):  
Ade Adebajo ◽  
Lisa Dunkley

Polyarticular disease is a commonly encountered musculoskeletal problem which regularly confronts clinicians as a diagnostic dilemma. Polyarticular disease is a musculoskeletal presentation in which more than four joints are affected by the disease. The classical rheumatological condition which presents as polyarticular disease is rheumatoid arthritis, although even this condition can very occasionally present with a mono- or oligoarticular onset. Polyarticular disease includes a wide range of musculoskeletal conditions including such disorders as polyarticular gout, the seronegative spondyloarthropathies, rheumatic fever, and systemic lupus erythematosus. This chapter emphasizes how through a careful history, thorough clinical examination and appropriate investigations, a definitive diagnosis can be made in a patient presenting clinically with polyarticular disease. General management principles for patients with polyarticular disease are also provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document