CENTRALIZATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL

The article presents a vision of the development path of the laboratory of clinical microbiology: technical reequipment of "manual" operating procedures at the research stages, introduction of the principles of standardization of the technological process, evaluation of research results. The author emphasizes the need to guide new scientific views on the problem of antibiotic resistance of microorganisms, to ensure the reliability of the results of microbiological studies.

USING THE METHODOLOGY OF CARCINOGENIC RISKS ASSESSMENT IN COPPER PYROMETALLURGY

We conducted a hygienic assessment of the chemical factors contribution of the production environment to the formation of carcinogenic risk of workers employed in the reverberatory and blast smelting of copper-containing ores, compared with autogenous processes. Inorganic arsenic compounds have been shown to be a major factor forming a carcinogenic risk in copper smelting. The greatest prognostic values of carcinogenic risk for similar professions of metallurgical shops are observed during reverberatory and blast smelting, rather than during bath smelting due to the difference in the equipment used. The main measure to reduce the carcinogenic risk of blister copper production should be the technical reequipment of smelters with the introduction of autogenous processes.

Social Perspectives Of The Digital Economy Of The Russian Federation 2017-2030 Project

The Object of the Study. The Russian society in the condition of transition to the fourth industrial revolution.The Subject of the Study. Social problems in the context of the transitional period.The Main Provisions of the Article. The new project of digitalization aimed at building a society of knowledge and creating the economy of a new type has practically a defensive nature, first of all directed toward defending sovereinty by way of creating home analogues 4.0. Taking into account an open global and all-penetrating character of the new generation of technologies such an approach could turn to Russian self-isolation and further backwardness. A complex index of readiness to 2017 has shown that sovereignty in Russia has a rather high level that’s why a new digitalization project really consolidates the achieved success. Too little attention has been paid to social problems in the project documents if compared to technical reequipment being limited to only personnel and education. Recognizing significance of digital competence and working out measure for their development among people is obviously not sufficient. A low level of economy with a high level of social inequality, lack of development of analogue supplemets, and Russians’ treating mistrust to institutes will prevent from appearing original, not duplicating, technologies 4.0. A high level of technical optimism of the Russians achieved by the former projects of informatisation of technologies prevalence for solving the problems in question, must be used.