autoregressive analysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

79
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
pp. 104250
Author(s):  
Xun Li ◽  
Wendy Y. Chen ◽  
Fox Zhi Yong Hu ◽  
Frankie Hin Ting Cho




Author(s):  
Helmut Lütkepohl ◽  
Mika Meitz ◽  
Aleksei Netšunajev ◽  
Pentti Saikkonen

Summary Tests for identification through heteroskedasticity in structural vector autoregressive analysis are developed for models with two volatility states where the time point of volatility change is known. The tests are Wald-type tests for which only the unrestricted model, including the covariance matrices of the two volatility states, has to be estimated. The residuals of the model are assumed to be from the class of elliptical distributions, which includes Gaussian models. The asymptotic null distributions of the test statistics are derived, and simulations are used to explore their small-sample properties. Two empirical examples illustrate the usefulness of the tests in applied work.



2020 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Holt ◽  
Timo Teräsvirta




2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Francisco ROSSONI ◽  
Renato Ribeiro de LIMA

The analysis of variance remains one of the most appreciated techniques of field experiment, even despite almost a hundred years of its first proposal. However, in many cases, its application can be several impaired due the fact of lack – or even forgotten - of assumptions. In several experiments, the researchers make use of blocks to control the local heterogeneity, nevertheless, in some cases, only this it cannot be enough, especially in experiments where the data have some kind of spatial dependence. Therefore, to increase the accuracy of comparisons between treatments, an alternative is to consider the study of the spatial dependence of the variables in the analysis. With the knowledge of the relative positions of the plots (referenced data), the spatial variability can be used as a positive factor, collaborating with the experimental results. To develop this study we used data generated by simulation. The data was generated according a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), with eighteen and five treatments per block; and several scenarios of spatial dependence in the error. We compared the non-spatial analysis (which considers the errors independent) with spatial analysis (analysis of variance considering the autoregressive model - ANOVA-AR). The use of spatial statistical tools in the analysis of data increased the precision of the analysis, through the reduction of the Mean Squared Error. We also noticed a reduction of Mean Squared Block and Mean Squared Treatment. The greater reduction was notice in ANOVA-AR3 for great part of the simulated scenarios, mainly in those with strong spatial dependence. The experiments with a small number of treatments per block did not present a reduction of Mean Squared Error, however, the reduction of Mean Squared Block and Mean Squared Treatment, ally to the fact that data are spatial dependent justify the use of ANOVA-AR.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document