deadtime correction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (S3) ◽  
pp. 1768-1769
Author(s):  
J. B. Lewis ◽  
D. Isheim ◽  
C. Floss ◽  
T. L. Daulton ◽  
D. N. Seidman

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-272
Author(s):  
Y. INOUE ◽  
T. OHTAKE ◽  
I. YOKOYAMA ◽  
K. YOSHIKAWA ◽  
K. OHTOMO
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth F. Koral ◽  
Kenneth R. Zasadny ◽  
Robert J. Ackermann ◽  
Edward P. Ficaro

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. A17-A25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Hoffman ◽  
P. Duffy Cutler ◽  
Thomas M. Guerrero ◽  
Ward M. Digby ◽  
John C. Mazziotta

A three-dimensional brain phantom has been developed to simulate the activity distributions found in human brain studies currently employed in positron emission tomography (PET). The phantom has a single contiguous chamber and utilizes thin layers of lucite to provide apparent relative concentrations of 5, 1, and 0 for gray matter, white matter, and CSF structures, respectively. The phantom and an ideal image set were created from the same set of data. Thus, the user has a basis for comparing measured images with an ideal set that allows a quantitative evaluation of errors in PET studies with an activity distribution similar to that found in patients. The phantom was employed in a study of the effect of deadtime and scatter on accuracy in quantitation on a current PET system. Deadtime correction factors were found to be significant (1.1–2.5) at count rates found in clinical studies. Deadtime correction techniques were found to be accurate to within 5%. Scatter in emission and attenuation correction data consistently caused 5–15% errors in quantitation, whereas correction for scatter in both types of data reduced errors in accuracy to <5%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document