Cultural Studies Review
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

764
(FIVE YEARS 79)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Published By "University Of Technology, Sydney"

1837-8692, 1446-8123

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Chris Healy ◽  
Katrina Schlunke
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-30
Author(s):  
Jamie Wang

  In 2013, the Singapore government announced a plan to build the Cross Island Line (CRL), the country’s eighth Mass Rapid Transit train line. Since its release, the proposal has caused ongoing heated debate as it involves going underneath Singapore’s largest remaining reserve: the Central Catchment Nature Reserve. Following extended discussions with environmental groups, the transport authority later stated that they would now consider two route options: a direct alignment running underneath the Central Reserve, and an alternative route that skirts the reserve boundary. The authority warned that the skirting option could increase the construction cost significantly and cost commuters an extra few minutes of travel time. Intriguingly, in contrast to the underground rail project that threatens to further fragment the Central Reserve, another, more visible, repair work is taking place at the edge of the same reserve, aiming to reconnect fragmented habitat through an eco-bridge. Through these two seemingly contrasting yet intimately related case studies in a highly developed city-state, this article explores the complexity and ambivalence of urban movement and its entanglement with development, techonology and urban natures. How are the discourses of urban mobility directed by the desire for ‘velocity’, the politics of invisibility, and a fixation on certainty? What might it mean to reconfigure contemporary practices and ethics towards multispecies movements in an increasingly urbanised environment? Amid the growing expansions of infrastructure and public transportation in Singapore and around the world, often in the name of sustainability and liveability, this article unsettles some taken-for-granted, velocity-charged and human-centred approaches to urban movement and explores the serious need to craft new possibilities for a more inclusive and flourishing urban movement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boi Huyen Ngo

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Biddle

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Ravenscroft
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Frow

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabby Fletcher

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Driscoll

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Birch

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Kenner ◽  
Aftab Mirzaei ◽  
Christy Spackman

Thinking at the scale of the Anthropocene highlights the significant burden on all life imposed by the residues of industrialization as well as continued pollution. But it also risks a disconnect between the functioning of planetary atmospheres and the functioning of local airs. In this thought-piece, we consider together the potato chip bag, the asthma inhaler, and climate positive building design as scalar practices of Anthropocene air. By figuring Anthropocene air as an interscalar vehicle, we show connections between matter and relations that seem distant and disconnected. We do this by honing in on respiration as a transformative atmospheric process that has been designed in advanced capitalism to extend life for some, while denying life for others. We point to seconds, hours, days, weeks, and seasons to highlight how containment technologies and respiratory processes function in the Anthropocene to remake air. These technologies and practices, which all too often go unnoticed in consumption landscapes, demonstrate that despite Anthropocene air’s tendency to exceed human agency, it is liable to engineering. Doing this offers insight into where different scales of action can be mobilized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document