The conclusion emphasizes that when one takes migrants’ desires, histories, family, and community relationships into account, migration can be seen not as a detriment to literacy education, but instead as an instigator of it. Specifically, as literacy travelled transnationally among family members, it appeared to amass ideological, emotional, and financial values—values that amplified eachother in material sites and practices of written communication. Harnessing the informal transnational literacy learning that results from migration has potential for making literacy pedagogy relevant for students’ familial and economic realities. Outlining implications for researchers and educators, the conclusion details how writing for love and money can matter not only for transnational families but also for students with more apparently nationally bounded lives.