Distortions of bone cell metabolism in uremia and their cause

1969 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Nichols
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Trzeciakiewicz ◽  
Véronique Habauzit ◽  
Marie-Noëlle Horcajada

Recent research has provided insights into dietary components that may optimise bone health and stimulate bone formation. Fruit and vegetable intake, as well as grains and other plant-derived food, have been linked to decreased risk of major chronic diseases including osteoporosis. This effect has been partially attributed to the polyphenols found in these foods. Thus, it has been suggested that these compounds may provide desirable bone health benefits through an action on bone cell metabolism. The present review will focus on how some polyphenols can modulate osteoblast function and reports which cellular signalling pathways are potentially implicated. However, to date, despite numerous investigations, few studies have provided clear evidence that phenolic compounds can act on osteoblasts. Polyphenols cited in the present review seem to be able to modulate the expression of transcription factors such as runt-related transcription factor-2 (Runx2) and Osterix, NF-κB and activator protein-1 (AP-1). It appears that polyphenols may act on cellular signalling such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), oestrogen receptor and osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (OPG/RANKL) and thus may affect osteoblast functions. However, it is also important to take in account the possible interaction of these compounds on osteoclast metabolism to better understand the positive correlation reported between the consumption of fruit and vegetables and bone mass.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
SA Duursma ◽  
JA Raymakers ◽  
HJJ Verhaar

Three diseases of bone are common in the elderly: osteoporosis, osteomalacia and Paget’s disease of bone. Osteoporosis is the result of bone loss, caused by a change in factors that regulate bone cell metabolism. The process of bone loss itself, resulting in osteoporosis, does not cause symptoms. It is the consequences of osteoporosis, fractures and bone deformity, that patients complain of. Osteomalacia is a defect in the process of mineralization of bone, nearly always due to vitamin D deficiency. In contrast to osteoporosis, patients with osteomalacia may have complaints of bone pain and muscle weakness. Page’s disease of bone is probably caused by a slow virus, which initially affects osteoclasts, followed by stimulation of osteoblasts. The process of increased bone cell turnover itself does not usually cause complaints. However, it results in deformation of bones and joints causing a painful secondary osteoarthritis. Pain resulting from high bone cell turnover responds remarkably quickly to treatment. In exceptional cases local pain in the long bones occurs. In an earlier review the problems of origin, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis were discussed. This paper focuses on diagnostic procedures and therapeutic regimens.


1960 ◽  
Vol 198 (4) ◽  
pp. 749-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Nichols ◽  
Nancy Nichols

The effect of parathyroidectomy on the composition of plasma and bone has been examined in rats with and without sodium depletion. Parathyroidectomy caused a marked fall in calcium and a slight decrease in chloride in the plasma and a 7.9% increase in bone mineral sodium concentration. Sodium depletion by intraperitoneal dialysis of normal animals lowered bone mineral sodium 4% while plasma sodium and pH remained at almost normal levels. In contrast, sodium depletion following parathyroidectomy failed to lower bone sodium significantly but produced a significant acidosis and a slight decrease in plasma sodium. These findings suggest that the ability of bone to release sodium ions to protect extracellular fluid pH in acute sodium depletion is dependent on the presence of the parathyroid glands. Possible mechanisms by which parathyroid activity might influence bone sodium metabolism by changes in bone cell metabolism, changes in the Na:Ca ratio of extracellular fluid, or actual bone destruction are discussed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1108-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Balint ◽  
Stuart M. Sprague
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 210 (7) ◽  
pp. 1274-1275
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 1799-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamyar Asadipooya ◽  
Edilfavia Mae Uy

AbstractDiabetes compromises bone cell metabolism and function, resulting in increased risk of fragility fracture. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) interact with the receptor for AGEs (RAGE) and can make a meaningful contribution to bone cell metabolism and/or alter function. Searches in PubMed using the key words “advanced glycation end-product,” “RAGE,” “sRAGE,” “bone,” and “diabetes” were made to explain some of the clinical outcomes of diabetes in bone metabolism through the AGE–RAGE signaling pathway. All published clinical studies were included in tables. The AGE–RAGE signaling pathway participates in diabetic complications, including diabetic osteopathy. Some clinical results in diabetic patients, such as reduced bone density, suppressed bone turnover markers, and bone quality impairment, could be potentially due to AGE–RAGE signaling consequences. However, the AGE–RAGE signaling pathway has some helpful roles in the bone, including an increase in osteogenic function. Soluble RAGE (sRAGE), as a ligand decoy, may increase in either conditions of RAGE production or destruction, and then it cannot always reflect the AGE–RAGE signaling. Recombinant sRAGE can block the AGE–RAGE signaling pathway but is associated with some limitations, such as accessibility to AGEs, an increase in other RAGE ligands, and a long half-life (24 hours), which is associated with losing the beneficial effect of AGE/RAGE. As a result, sRAGE is not a helpful marker to assess activity of the RAGE signaling pathway. The recombinant sRAGE cannot be translated into clinical practice due to its limitations.


1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 736-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lieberherr ◽  
B. Grosse ◽  
G. Cournot–Witmer ◽  
M.P.M. Hermann–Erlee ◽  
S. Balsan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document