scholarly journals Adverse Events After Pars Plana Vitrectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries

2009 ◽  
Vol 127 (12) ◽  
pp. 1656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Pars Plana

scholarly journals Surgical timing and presence of a vitreoretinal fellow on postoperative adverse events following pars plana vitrectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-87
Author(s):  
Ryan A Shields ◽  
Cassie A Ludwig ◽  
Matthew A Powers ◽  
Jonathan D Tijerina ◽  
Ira H Schachar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Vitreous Hemorrhage ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Start Time ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Postoperative Vitreous Hemorrhage

Introduction: To evaluate the adverse event rate following pars plana vitrectomy as a function of surgical start time and the presence of a vitreoretinal fellow. Methods: Single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 at Stanford University School of Medicine (Palo Alto, CA, USA). Records were reviewed for surgical start time, the presence of vitreoretinal fellow, and postoperative adverse events defined as any finding deviating from the expected postoperative course requiring observation or intervention. Results: A total of 310 pars plana vitrectomies were performed. There was no statistical difference in the rate of any adverse event when comparing cases starting after 16:01 (9/13, 69.2%) and after 12:01 (42/99, 42.4%) to a morning start time (69/198, 34.9%, adjusted p = 0.083). There was a statistically significant increase in the risk of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage with afternoon and evening cases as compared to morning cases (adjusted p = 0.021). In addition, there was no difference in any adverse event with a fellow present (93/244, 38.1%) compared to without (27/66, 40.9%, adjusted p = 0.163). There was a higher risk of postoperative hypotony when a fellow was involved (6.6% vs 0%, p = 0.028), though this difference disappeared after adjusting for confounders (adjusted p = 0.252). There was no difference in the length of surgery with and without a fellow (49 vs 54 min, respectively; p = 0.990). Discussion: Afternoon start time and the presence of a fellow were not independent risk factors for postoperative adverse events.

scholarly journals Adverse Events during Vitrectomy under Adequacy of Anesthesia—An Additional Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4172
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Pluta ◽  
Michał Jan Stasiowski ◽  
Anita Lyssek-Boroń ◽  
Seweryn Król ◽  
Lech Krawczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Topical Analgesia ◽  
Group Allocation

The intraprocedural immobilization of selected subsets of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) requires the performance of general anesthesia (GA), which entails the intraoperative use of hypnotics and titration of opioids. The Adequacy of Anesthesia (AoA) concept of GA guidance optimizes the intraoperative dosage of hypnotics and opioids. Pre-emptive analgesia (PA) is added to GA to minimize intraoperative opioid (IO) usage. The current additional analysis evaluated the advantages of PA using either COX-3 inhibitors or regional techniques when added to AoA-guided GA on the rate of presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), oculo-emetic (OER), and oculo-cardiac reflex (OCR) in patients undergoing PPV. A total of 176 patients undergoing PPV were randomly allocated into 5 groups: (1) Group GA, including patients who received general anesthesia alone; (2) Group T, including patients who received preventive topical analgesia by triple instillation of 2% proparacaine 15 min before induction of GA; (3) Group PBB, including patients who received PBB; (4) Group M, including patients who received PA using a single dose of 1 g of metamizole; (5) Group P, including patients who received PA using a single dose of 1 g of acetaminophen. The incidence rates of PONV, OCR, and OER were studied as a secondary outcome. Despite the group allocation, intraoperative AoA-guided GA resulted in an overall incidence of PONV in 9%, OCR in 12%, and OER in none of the patients. No statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding the incidence of OCR. PA using COX-3 inhibitors, as compared to that of the T group, resulted in less overall PONV (p < 0.05). Conclusions: PA using regional techniques in patients undergoing PPV proved to have no advantage when AoA-guided GA was utilised. We recommend using intraoperative AoA-guided GA to reduce the presence of OCR, and the addition of PA using COX-3 inhibitors to reduce the rate of PONV.

Transscleral Extraction of an Intraocular Foreign Body From the Posterior Segment of the Eye Without Pars Plana Vitrectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-23
Author(s):  
Štěpán Rusňák ◽  
Lenka Hecová
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Vitreous Body ◽  
Visual Control ◽  
Intraocular Foreign Body ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Surgical Method ◽  
Eye Trauma ◽  
Pars Plana

Purpose: Penetrating eye trauma with an intraocular foreign body is very frequent, especially in men in their productive age. Pars plana vitrectomy would be the standard surgical method at our department. However, in indicated cases (metallic intraocular bodies in the posterior eye segment in young patients with well transparent ocular media without detached ZSM and without any evident vitreoretinal traction) transscleral extraction of the intraocular foreign body is performed using the exo magnet, eventually endo magnet with a minimal PPV without PVD induction under the visual control of endo-illumination. Materials and Methods: Between June 2003 and June 2018, 66 eyes of 66 patients diagnosed with a penetrating eye trauma caused by an intraocular foreign body located in the posterior eye segment were treated. In 18 eyes (27,3 %) with a metallic foreign body in vitreous (body) or in retina, no PPV or a minimal PPV without PVD was used as a surgical method. In the remaining 48 eyes (72,7 %), a standard 20G, respectively 23G PPV method were used together with PVD induction and the foreign body extraction via endo or exo magnet. Conclusions: As demonstrated by our survey/study, in the cases of a thoroughly considered indication an experimented vitreoretinal surgeon can perform a safe NCT transscleral extraction from the posterior eye segment via exo magnet, eventually endo magnet under the visual control of a contact display system with a minimal PPV. Thereby, the surgeon can enhance the patient´s chance to preserve their own lens and its accommodative abilities as well as reduce the risk of further surgical interventions of the afflicted eye.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document