Under Most Circumstances, Thyroid Lobectomy Is Appropriate for Low-Risk Patients With Papillary Cancer of the Thyroid

2001 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic P. Ogren
2001 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 458
Author(s):  
Kelly L. Wirfel ◽  
Melanie L. Richards ◽  
Randal A. Otto

2010 ◽  
Vol 06 ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Alessandro Antonelli ◽  
Pablo Miccoli ◽  
Gabriele Materazzi ◽  
Michele Minuto ◽  
Poupak Fallahi ◽  
...  

The incidence of thyroid cancer has been increasing over the past 30 years. The follicular-cell-derived thyroid carcinomas (DTC) – papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) – are most common (79 and 13%, respectively). Initial treatment of DTC involves resection of the primary tumour. Post-operative therapy consists of radioactive iodine ablation for most patients, followed by thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression with thyroxine. An ongoing controversy in the surgical treatment of DTC is the extent of thyroid gland resection. Consensus guidelines recommend total or near-total thyroidectomy in high-risk DTC (PTC tumour >1–2cm, any tumour, node, metastasis [TNM] stage III and IV [extrathyroidal spread], any N1 [regional metastasis] or M1 [distant metastasis], any patient 㹅 years and <16 years of age, aggressive histological subtypes) rather than thyroid lobectomy as the initial procedure of choice, given its advantages of treating potential multicentric disease, facilitating maximal uptake of adjuvant radioactive iodine and facilitating post-treatment follow-up by monitoring serum thyroglobulin levels and neck ultrasonography. Low-risk patients are currently treated by thyroid lobectomy or total (or near-total) thyroidectomy; in fact, conflicting views persist for low-risk patients who have differentiated thyroid cancer. The main arguments for lobectomy in low-risk PTC patients are that there is no clear evidence that total thyroidectomy may affect the survival of patients with low-risk PTC, and that total thyroidectomy increases the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypoparathyroidism even in the hands of an experienced endocrine surgeon.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1944-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schwarz ◽  
Elizabeth C. Ward ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
Anne Coccetti ◽  
Pamela D'Netto ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the agreement between allied health assistants (AHAs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when completing dysphagia screening for low-risk referrals and at-risk patients under a delegation model and (b) the operational impact of this delegation model. Method All AHAs worked in the adult acute inpatient settings across three hospitals and completed training and competency evaluation prior to conducting independent screening. Screening (pass/fail) was based on results from pre-screening exclusionary questions in combination with a water swallow test and the Eating Assessment Tool. To examine the agreement of AHAs' decision making with SLPs, AHAs ( n = 7) and SLPs ( n = 8) conducted an independent, simultaneous dysphagia screening on 51 adult inpatients classified as low-risk/at-risk referrals. To examine operational impact, AHAs independently completed screening on 48 low-risk/at-risk patients, with subsequent clinical swallow evaluation conducted by an SLP with patients who failed screening. Results Exact agreement between AHAs and SLPs on overall pass/fail screening criteria for the first 51 patients was 100%. Exact agreement for the two tools was 100% for the Eating Assessment Tool and 96% for the water swallow test. In the operational impact phase ( n = 48), 58% of patients failed AHA screening, with only 10% false positives on subjective SLP assessment and nil identified false negatives. Conclusion AHAs demonstrated the ability to reliably conduct dysphagia screening on a cohort of low-risk patients, with a low rate of false negatives. Data support high level of agreement and positive operational impact of using trained AHAs to perform dysphagia screening in low-risk patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document