scholarly journals An Alternative Analysis of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Data May Improve the Ability to Detect Multiglandular Disease

2004 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Gauger
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Multiglandular Disease ◽  
Alternative Analysis ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone

scholarly journals Feasibility of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring in Minimally Invasive Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 491-499
Author(s):  
Soo Jin Kim ◽  
Ju Hyun Yun ◽  
Sohl Park ◽  
Yu Jin Go ◽  
So Jeong Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Normal Limit ◽  
Multiglandular Disease ◽  
Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Sestamibi Scan ◽  
Abnormal Parathyroid Gland ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
New Criteria ◽  
Single Lesion

Background and Objectives There has been a long debate on whether intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring is mandatory or not in the excision of a single abnormal parathyroid gland. The aim of this study is to suggest a new criteron of IOPTH monitoring. Subjects and Method We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy from 2005 to 2019. Patients had IOPTH not measured and those with secondary hyperparathyroidism were excluded. IOPTH was measured preoperatively (EX00), at 10 minutes (EX10) and 20 minutes (EX20) after the excision and analyzed. We determined the surgery as a ‘successful excision of lesion (SEOUL)’ when it met the following criteria: criterion 1) the level of EX10 or EX20 decreased under the upper normal or under upper limit of parathyroid hormone (65 pg/mL); criterion 2) EX20 decreased below 50% of EX00 and less than 195 pg/ mL (3 times the upper normal limit); criterion 3) multiglandular disease. Results Twenty-five patients among 31 patients were included this study (M:F=8:17). Twenty- two patients were suspected of single lesion and three patients of multiple lesions on preoperative images (99mTc-sestamibi scan, neck CT, and PET-CT). IOPTH of EX00, EX10, and EX20 were 488.92±658.74, 121.36±134.73, and 92.44±111.55 pg/mL, respectively. Sixty-four percent patients (16/25) met the criterion 1. Six patients (24%) successfully excised a lesion meeting the criterion 2. Three patients had multiglandular disease, meeting the criterion 3. Conclusion Our new criteria suggest when we could stop the procedure. If the level of IOPTH does not meet the SEOUL criteria, it means that there might be more lesions.

Does Rapid Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Analysis Predict Cure in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism?

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. S. Nilsen ◽  
E. Haug ◽  
M. Heidemann ◽  
S. J. Karlsen
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Parathyroid Tissue ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Sestamibi Scintigraphy ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone

Background and Aims: Preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy is used by many surgeons to identify the anatomical location of pathological parathyroid glands in patients undergoing surgical treatment for hyperparathyroidism. However, false negative results do occur. It has been suggested that intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) analysis may enhance the possibility of performing successful focused, unilateral neck surgery in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether an adequate fall in intraoperative parathyroid hormone values predicts the removal of all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue and postoperative normocalcemia. Material and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing surgery for hyperparathyroidism had preoperative 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy and intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) analysis. A fall in intraoperative PTH value by more than 50% of baseline value ended the procedure. This prospective study presents the clinical and biochemical results. Results: The overall sensitivity of the 99mTc-sestamib scintigraphy was 88% and for single adenomas 95%. The scintigraphy failed to detect the correct pathology in all cases with multiglandular disease (7 patients). A fall in intraoperative PTH value by more than 50% of baseline value was achieved in all patients. The combination of intraoperative PTH analysis and 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy enabled us to limit the operation to a focused, unilateral operation in 87 of the 100 patients. All patients were normocalcemic postoperatively. Conclusions: A fall in intraoperative PTH value more than 50 % of baseline value seems to predict postoperative normocalcemia and the removal of all hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue. Bilateral neck exploration is avoided in the majority of patients.

scholarly journals Disparity between Preoperative and Pre-Excisional Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone in Parathyroid Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 382-386
Author(s):  
Maheer Masood ◽  
Trevor Hackman
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Parathyroid Surgery ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intraoperative Pth ◽  
Gland Function ◽  
Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Clinic Visits

Introduction Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) testing is a widely accepted standard for assessing the parathyroid gland function. A decline of preoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels by more than 50% is one accepted measure of parathyroid surgery adequacy. However, there may be a variation between preoperative PTH levels obtained at a clinic visit and pre-excisional ioPTH. Objective Our study explores the differences between preoperative PTH and pre-excisional ioPTH levels, and the potential impact this difference has on determining the adequacy of parathyroid surgery. Methods A retrospective study that consisted of 33 patients that had undergone parathyroid resection between September 2009 and March 2016 at a tertiary academic center was performed. Each subject's preoperative PTH levels were obtained from clinic visits and pre-excisional ioPTH levels were recorded along with the time interval between the measurements. Results There was a significant difference between the mean preoperative PTH and the pre-excisional ioPTH levels of 147 pg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.43 to 284.47; p = 0.0396). The exclusion of four outliers revealed a further significant difference with a mean of 35.09 pg/mL (95% CI 20.27 to 49.92; p < 0.0001). The average time interval between blood draws was 48 days + 32 days. A weak correlation between the change in PTH values and the time interval between preoperative and pre-excision blood draws was noted (r2 = 0.15). Conclusion Our study reveals a significant difference between the preoperative PTH levels obtained at clinic visits and the pre-excisional intraoperative PTH levels. We recommend routine pre-excisional intraoperative PTH levels, despite evidence of elevated preoperative PTH levels, in order to more accurately assess the adequacy of surgical resection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document