scholarly journals Effects of smoking intervention and the use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator on the rate of decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study

JAMA ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 272 (19) ◽  
pp. 1497-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Anthonisen
1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-111
Author(s):  
J Manfreda ◽  
NR Anthonisen ◽  
The Lung Health Study Research Group

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether smoking intervention and use of an inhaled bronchodilator can slow the rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in smokers with mild obstructive pulmonary disease.DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial: participants randomized to one of three groups: smoking intervention plus inhaled bronchodilator (Atrovent; ipratropium bromide) (SIA): smoking intervention plus placebo (SIP); or no intervention (usual care, UC).SETTING: Ten centres in the United States and Canada.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5887 smokers, aged 35 to 60 years, with FEV155 to 90% predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) less than 70%.INTERVENTIONS: Smoking intervention: intensive program combining behaviour modification and use or nicotine gum, with a subsequent maintenance program to prevent relapse. Bronchodilator: ipratropium bromide, two puffs three times daily from a metered dose inhaler.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in FEV1over a five-year period.RESULTS: Sustained smoking cessation was achieved in 22% of both intervention groups (SIA, SIP), compared with 5% in UC. Both SIA and SIP groups showed significantly smaller declines in postbronchodilator FEV1over the five years of the study - 184 mL and 209 mL, respectively. compared with 267 mL in UC. This difference was accounted for by an increase in FEV1in the SIA (+39 mL) and SIP (+11 mL) groups in the first year of the study, compared with a decline in UC (-34 mL). Those who achieved sustained smoking cessation experienced the greatest benefit, evident for the five years of study. There was a small noncumulative benefit associated with use of the active bronchodilator, which disappeared after the bronchodilator was discontinued.CONCLUSIONS: An effective smoking intervention program significantly reduced decline in FEV1in smokers with mild airways obstruction. Use of an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator did not influence the long term decline of FEV1.


2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
M.S. Simmons ◽  
J.E. Connett ◽  
M.A. Nides ◽  
P.G. Lindgren ◽  
E.C. Kleerup ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Murray ◽  
William C. Bailey ◽  
Kathleen Daniels ◽  
Wendy M. Bjornson ◽  
Karole Kurnow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document