Tooth and Jaw, Biomechanics of

Author(s):  
Sinan M��ft�� ◽  
Ali M��ft��
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiktoria Wojnicz ◽  
Izabela Lubowiecka ◽  
Agnieszka Tomaszewska ◽  
Katarzyna Szepietowska ◽  
Pawel Bielski

PalZ ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Brenda Desojo ◽  
Sergio Fabián Vizcaíno

2013 ◽  
Vol 280 (1770) ◽  
pp. 20131940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Stubbs ◽  
Stephanie E. Pierce ◽  
Emily J. Rayfield ◽  
Philip S. L. Anderson

Mesozoic crurotarsans exhibited diverse morphologies and feeding modes, representing considerable ecological diversity, yet macroevolutionary patterns remain unexplored. Here, we use a unique combination of morphological and biomechanical disparity metrics to quantify the ecological diversity and trophic radiations of Mesozoic crurotarsans, using the mandible as a morpho-functional proxy. We recover three major trends. First, the diverse assemblage of Late Triassic crurotarsans was morphologically and biomechanically disparate, implying high levels of ecological variation; but, following the end-Triassic extinction, disparity declined. Second, the Jurassic radiation of marine thalattosuchians resulted in very low morphological disparity but moderate variation in jaw biomechanics, highlighting a hydrodynamic constraint on mandibular form. Third, during the Cretaceous terrestrial radiations of neosuchians and notosuchians, mandibular morphological variation increased considerably. By the Late Cretaceous, crocodylomorphs evolved a range of morphologies equalling Late Triassic crurotarsans. By contrast, biomechanical disparity in the Cretaceous did not increase, essentially decoupling from morphology. This enigmatic result could be attributed to biomechanical evolution in other anatomical regions (e.g. cranium, dentition or postcranium), possibly releasing the mandible from selective pressures. Overall, our analyses reveal a complex relationship between morphological and biomechanical disparity in Mesozoic crurotarsans that culminated in specialized feeding ecologies and associated lifestyles.


2010 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duygu Koc ◽  
Arife Dogan ◽  
Bulent Bek

Maximum voluntary bite force is an indicator of the functional state of the masticatory system and the level of maximum bite force results from the combined action of the jaw elevator muscles modified by jaw biomechanics and reflex mechanisms. The measurement of bite force can provide useful data for the evaluation of jaw muscle function and activity. It is also an adjunctive value in assessing the performance of dentures. Technological advances in signal detection and processing have improved the quality of the information extracted from bite force measurements. However, these measurements are difficult and the reliability of the result depends on a number of factors, such as presence of pain and temporomandibular disorders, gender, age, cranio-facial morphology, and occlusal factors. In addition to these physiological factors, recording devices and techniques are important factors in bite force measurement. Therefore, one should be careful when comparing the bite force values reported in the research. (Eur J Dent 2010;4:223-232)


Author(s):  
Lucy H. Brunt ◽  
Karen A. Roddy ◽  
Emily J. Rayfield ◽  
Chrissy L. Hammond

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. Curtis ◽  
O. Plesh ◽  
A.G. Hannam ◽  
A. Sharma ◽  
T.A. Curtis
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document