scholarly journals Clotting factor concentrates given to prevent bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with hemophilia A or B

Author(s):  
K Stobart ◽  
A Iorio ◽  
JK Wu
Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3114-3114
Author(s):  
Kent Stobart ◽  
Alfonso Iorio

Abstract Introduction: One of the current approaches to managing persons with hemophilia entails the use of prophylactic treatment with clotting factor concentrates (CFC) to prevent bleeds and bleeding related complications. However, this process is not practiced in all countries, or is based on the synthesis of evidence from data of all trials. Objective: To conduct a systematic review/meta-analysis (SR/MA) regarding the effectiveness of clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis in the management of people with hemophilia A or B. Methods: We conducted a SR of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied the effect of prophylactic CFCs in people with hemophilia A or B. We searched all major electronic databases (MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group’s Controlled Trials Register) as well as performing handsearches of journals and relevant meeting abstract books. We included RCTs that that compared the use of prophylactic CFCs to a control group. Results: We identified 29 studies, of which four (including 37 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies evaluated hemophilia A; one showed a decrease in frequency of joint bleeds with prophylaxis compared to placebo (non-physiological dose), with a rate difference (RD) −10.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) −16.33 to −5.27) bleeds per year. The remaining two studies evaluating hemophilia A compared two prophylaxis regimens, one study showed no difference in joint bleed frequency, RD −5.04 (95%CI −17.02 to 6.94) bleeds per year and another failed to demonstrate an advantage of factor VIII dosing based on individual pharmacokinetic data over the standard prophylaxis regimen with RD −0.14 (95% CI −1.34 to 1.05) bleeds per year. The fourth study evaluated hemophilia B and showed fewer joint bleeds with weekly (15 IU/kg) versus bi-weekly (7.5 IU/kg) prophylaxis, RD −3.30 (95% CI −5.50 to − 1.10) bleeds per year. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether prophylactic clotting factor concentrates decrease bleeding and bleeding-related complications in hemophilia A or B, compared to placebo, on-demand treatment, or prophylaxis based on pharmacokinetic data from individuals. Well-designed RCTs are needed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic clotting factor concentrates.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3078-3078
Author(s):  
Margaret V. Ragni ◽  
Kristen Jaworski ◽  
Lisa Boggio ◽  
Doreen B. Brettler ◽  
W. Keith Hoots ◽  
...  

Abstract Over 80% of adults with hemophilia are infected with hepatitis C (HCV) infection through exposure to clotting factor concentrates 20 or more years ago. Although liver biopsy is considered the gold standard to assess the severity of HCV liver disease, the majority of those with hemophilia do not undergo biopsy, even by the less invasive transjugular route. Little is known about the actual or perceived bleeding risks which may affect patient decisions about biopsy. Further, little is known about the minimal hemostatic dose of factor replacement which may affect physician decisions about biopsy. Of 161 hemophilic men enrolled in the multicenter HIV and HCV in Hemophilia (HHH) study which evaluates extent of and risks for HCV disease progression, 112 (69.6%) have decided against biopsy. Among the reasons, given by 75 of the latter, were fear of the procedure, in 23 (30.7%); lack of insurance, in 11 (14.7%); past biopsy, in 11 (14.7%); lack of time, in 10 (13.3%); lack of perceived indication, in 6 (8.0%); presence of an inhibitor, in 5 (6.7%); fear of bleeding, in 5 (6.7%); and other illness or uncertainty, in 4 (5.3%). The 49 (30.4%) agreeing to liver biopsy were more likely than those declining biopsy to be HIV+ (53.1% vs. 34.8%, p < 0.05) and less likely to have an inhibitor (0% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.002), but were as likely to have hemophilia A, 81.6% vs. 83.0%; be over 35 years of age, 49.0% vs. 53.1%; Caucasian, 81.6% vs. 85.7%; and HCV genotype 1, 80.8% vs. 79.5%, all p > 0.05. At the time of biopsy, the median platelet count was 185,000/ul (38,000–366,000/ul), the median PT was 12.0 seconds (9.4–15.4 sec), and the median INR was 1.0 (0.9–1.2). All patients received two doses of factor, and 25 (71.4%) received a third dose; three (8.6%) received a fourth dose for unrelated procedures. The median pre- and post-biopsy F.VIII doses were 49.5 U/kg, 26.6 U/kg at 1–4 hours and 45.0 U/kg at 24–48 hours; and the median F.IX doses were 74.0 U/kg, 44.3 U/kg, and 45.0 U/kg, respectively. No biopsy-related bleeding occurred. Minor adverse events included fever in two, liver function abnormality in one, and duodenal ulcer bleeding in one. The median Knodell, Ishak, and Metavir scores did not differ significantly by HIV status (+ vs.), type hemophilia (A vs. B), age (>35 vs ≤ 35 yr), HCV genotype (1 vs. non-1), or race (Caucasian vs. non-Caucasian). Although preliminary, these findings suggest that fear of the procedure is the most common deterrent to liver biopsy in patients with hemophilia. Yet, when performed by the transjugular route, liver biopsy appears to be safe, with excellent hemostasis achieved with a minimum of two doses of factor, including a 100% dose pre- and a 50% dose post-biopsy. These findings will require confirmation in larger numbers of subjects.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 572-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Lusher

IntroductionThe treatment of hemophilia A and B has improved considerably in recent years. The availability of hepatitis A and B vaccines, safer clotting factor concentrates (particularly recombinant factor VIII and recombinant factor IX concentrates), and synthetic agents, such as desmopressin,1 has resulted in earlier, more aggressive treatment and prophylactic regimens aimed at preventing chronic, debilitating joint disease.2-8There have been no new cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease attributable to clotting factor in North America since 1987, and documented instances of hepatitis transmission by clotting factor concentrates have been rare in the 1990s. Concerns remain that certain nonenveloped viruses, such as human parvovirus B19 and hepatitis A virus, can still be transmitted by some plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates,9and questions linger as to whether the agents causing Creutzfeld-Jacob disease (CJD) and new variant CJD might also be transmitted. Overall, however, the products available to treat hemophilia today are safer than ever before.An increasing number of persons with hemophilia are receiving exclusively recombinant (r) products, and manufacturers are now producing new, second-generation r-factor VIII products that are stabilized with sugars, rather than albumin, or are smaller, truncated molecules.10 Scientists are now designing specific changes into the factor VIII genes in an attempt to derive unique and improved forms of r-factor VIII.11 The next logical areas of focus are to bring to fruition the promise of an “unlimited supply” of r-factor VIII and r-factor IX products, to meet the needs of persons with hemophilia, not only in developed countries, but throughout the world, and to be able to cure hemophilia through gene therapy.As gene therapy trials begin in humans with hemophilia, the scientists involved, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and perhaps most importantly, members of the hemophilia community must decide which categories of affected individuals should be entered in these trials, particularly the earliest, Phase I trials. Who is most likely to benefit if gene therapy proves to be both effective and safe? Who should be the first patients to be enrolled in each new trial? Who is at greatest risk if something unexpected happens? What would be considered a good outcome? Clearly, some of these questions are more difficult to answer than others.


1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Mariani ◽  
R Ghirardini ◽  
P Verani ◽  
F Mandelli ◽  
G B Rossi ◽  
...  

In Italy, heated concentrates became the only source of hemophilia therapy since July 1985, when a government act enforced their use instead of nonheated concentrates. Since then 63 anti-HIV seronegative hemophiliacs treated with heated concentrates were followed-up prospectively, focusing on the development of anti-HIV. Anti-HIV (documented by persistent positivity for ELISA and WB) occurred in 6 patients who had no other risk factor for HIV infection. For 3, anti-HIV was first found in Sept., Oct. or Nov. 1985 i.e. within 4 months of the last infusion of unheated concentrates (July 1985). For another patient, anti-HIV was found in Sept. 1986, but no other sample was available after the last negative test (Nov. 1985). For these 4 cases, therefore, we cannot exclude that seroconversions are due to nonheated concentrates used until July 1985. For 2 patients, however, anti-HIV occurred in July 1986, i.e. 11 months after change to heated concentrates. For both a hemophilia A patient (treated exclusively with a concentrate dry-heated for 72 hr at 68°C) and a hemophilia B patient (treated with both a steam-heated concentrate and a concentrate dry-heated for 72 hr at 68°C) the last seronegativities were found in March 1986, i.e. 7.0 and 7.5 months after commencing the use of heated concentrates or 3.5 and 4.0 months before the first seropositivity. The overwhelming majority of heated concentrates were prepared from non-donor-screened plasma. In conclusion, two anti-HIV occurred in previously seronegative patients treated exclusively with heated concentrates. Intensity and duration of concentrate exposure to heating were greater than those for the commercial dry-heated concentrate (60°C for 30 hours) that caused two reported seroconversions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Preijers ◽  
Lisette M. Schütte ◽  
Marieke J. H. A. Kruip ◽  
Marjon H. Cnossen ◽  
Frank W. G. Leebeek ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document