scholarly journals Extreme Space Weather Impact: An Emergency Management Perspective

Space Weather ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 530-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H. MacAlester ◽  
William Murtagh
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Crosby ◽  
A. Veronig ◽  
E. Robbrecht ◽  
B. Vrsnak ◽  
S. Vennerstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Space Weather ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 838-848
Author(s):  
Sajan C. Mushini ◽  
Susan Skone ◽  
Emma Spanswick ◽  
Eric Donovan ◽  
Maryam Najmafshar
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (17) ◽  
pp. 8844-8852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majd Mayyasi ◽  
Dolon Bhattacharyya ◽  
John Clarke ◽  
Amy Catalano ◽  
Mehdi Benna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
A. Vourlidas ◽  
S. Patsourakos ◽  
N. P. Savani

Much progress has been made in the study of coronal mass ejections (CMEs), the main drivers of terrestrial space weather thanks to the deployment of several missions in the last decade. The flow of energy required to power solar eruptions is beginning to be understood. The initiation of CMEs is routinely observed with cadences of tens of seconds with arc-second resolution. Their inner heliospheric evolution can now be imaged and followed routinely. Yet relatively little progress has been made in predicting the geoeffectiveness of a particular CME. Why is that? What are the issues holding back progress in medium-term forecasting of space weather? To answer these questions, we review, here, the measurements, status and open issues on the main CME geoeffective parameters; namely, their entrained magnetic field strength and configuration, their Earth arrival time and speed, and their mass (momentum). We offer strategies for improving the accuracy of the measurements and their forecasting in the near and mid-term future. To spark further discussion, we incorporate our suggestions into a top-level draft action plan that includes suggestions for sensor deployment, technology development and modelling/theory improvements. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Solar eruptions and their space weather impact’.


2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 159-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucien G. Canton

Despite a distance of 100 years the Great San Francisco Earthquake and Fire still has much to teach the emergency managers of 2006. The response to the 1906 disaster foreshadows many modern emergency management techniques and sounds a cautionary note about areas where work still needs to be done. By comparing the city's response in 1906 with modern emergency plans, this paper examines how San Francisco might deal with a similar event in 2006. While many issues that marred the 1906 response have been resolved and much has been done to build resiliency, San Francisco in 2006 is in many ways still very similar in attitude to the San Francisco of 1906. Further, the recent example of Hurricane Katrina suggests that some of the more critical issues that arose in 1906 have still not been fully resolved.


Space Weather ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 489-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Cade
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-110
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Pilipenko

This review, offered for the first time in the Russian scientific literature, is devoted to various aspects of the problem of the space weather impact on ground-based technological systems. Particular attention is paid to hazards to operation of power transmission lines, railway automation, and pipelines caused by geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) during geomagnetic disturbances. The review provides information on the main characteristics of geomagnetic field variability, on rapid field variations during various space weather mani-festations. The fundamentals of modeling geoelectric field disturbances based on magnetotelluric sounding algorithms are presented. The approaches to the assessment of possible extreme values of GIC are considered. Information about economic effects of space weather and GIC is collected. The current state and prospects of space weather forecasting, risk assessment for technological systems from GIC impact are discussed. While in space geophysics various models for predicting the intensity of magnetic storms and their related geomagnetic disturbances from observations of the interplanetary medium are being actively developed, these models cannot be directly used to predict the intensity and position of GIC since the description of the geomagnetic field variability requires the development of additional models. Revealing the fine structure of fast geomagnetic variations during storms and substorms and their induced GIC bursts appeared to be important not only from a practical point of view, but also for the development of fundamentals of near-Earth space dynamics. Unlike highly specialized papers on geophysical aspects of geomagnetic variations and engineering aspects of the GIC impact on operation of industrial transformers, the review is designed for a wider scientific and technical audience without sacrificing the scientific level of presentation. In other words, the geophysical part of the review is written for engineers, and the engineering part is written for geophysicists. Despite the evident applied orientation of the studies under consideration, they are not limited to purely engineering application of space geophysics results to the calculation of possible risks for technological systems, but also pose a number of fundamental scientific problems


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document