Performance during start-up of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells at subfreezing conditions

Author(s):  
E. L. Thompson ◽  
W. Gu ◽  
H. A. Gasteiger
2019 ◽  
Vol 166 (14) ◽  
pp. F1112-F1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junning Wen ◽  
Dechun Si ◽  
Shangshang Wang ◽  
Han Ding ◽  
Chaoming Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongying Tang ◽  
Kang Geng ◽  
Lei Wu ◽  
Junjie Liu ◽  
Zhiquan Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Conventional proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) operate at a narrow temperature range, either under low temperature conditions (80‒90°C) using fully-humidified perfluorosulfonic acid (Nafion®) membranes or under non-humidified high temperature conditions (140‒180°C) using phosphoric acid (PA)-doped membranes to avoid water condensation-induced PA leaching. To allow wide operational flexibility over the full spectrum of temperature and humidity ranges, we present an innovative design strategy by using PA-doped intrinsically ultramicroporous membranes constructed from rigid and contorted high free volume polymers. The membranes with an average ultramicropore radius of 3.3 Å showed a significant siphoning effect as confirmed by the delocalization of PA in 31P NMR, thus allowing high retention of PA even under highly humidified conditions and presenting more than three orders of magnitude higher proton conductivity retention than conventional dense PA-doped polybenzimidazole membranes (PBI/PA). The resulting PEMFCs display impressive performance over a much broader temperature range from − 20 to 200°C and can accomplish over 100 start-up/shut-down cycles even at − 20°C. The broad operational flexibility rendered from the high PA-retention can ultimately simplify heat and water management and thereby reduce PEMFC costs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
pp. 735-741
Author(s):  
Jens Schäfer ◽  
Hannes Wilhelm Weinmann ◽  
Dominik Mayer ◽  
Tobias Storz ◽  
Janna Hofmann ◽  
...  

Nach Ankündigung diverser batterieelektrischer Modelle wird auch die PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane)-Brennstoffzelle als mögliche Zukunftstechnologie im Last- und Linienverkehr diskutiert. Ob und wann sich eine Technologie durchsetzt, hängt von der verwendeten Produktionstechnik ab, denn diese bestimmt Stückzahlen und resultierende Kosten. Die Vergangenheit zeigt, dass sich produzierende Industrien oft entlang vorhandener Kompetenzen in etablierten Bereichen entwickelt haben. In diesem Beitrag sollen daher Synergiepotenziale zwischen der Batterie- und Brennstoffzellenfertigung diskutiert werden.   Following the announcement of various battery electric models, PEM fuel cells are also discussed as a future technology in truck and line traffic. Whether and when a technology will be generally accepted depends largely on the production technology used, as this determines the number of units and the resulting costs. The past has shown that manufacturing industries have often developed along existing competencies in established areas. This article will therefore discuss the potential synergies between battery and fuel cell production.


Author(s):  
Sang-Yeop Lee ◽  
In-Gyu Min ◽  
Hyoung-Juhn Kim ◽  
Suk Woo Nam ◽  
Jaeyoung Lee ◽  
...  

Due to the advantage of fuel cells over secondary batteries such as long operation time, many efforts were executed in order to use fuel cells as main power sources of small electronic devices such as laptop computers and mobile phones. For the same reason, fuel cells are promising power sources for the hazardous mission robots. Fuel cells are able to increase their radius action through extension of operation time. Despite this advantage, there still exist technical barriers such as increasing power density, efficient hydrogen storage, and fast startup of the power system. First, in order to increase power density, the united stack including proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) and membrane humidifying cells were developed. Also, the hydrogen generating system using NaBH4 solution was employed to store hydrogen effectively. In addition, to shorten start-up time, hybrid control of PEMFC and Li-ion battery was adopted. The approaches mentioned above were evaluated. The developed PEMFC/humidifier stack showed high performance. As compared with full humidification condition by external humidifiers, the performance decrease was only 1% even though hydrogen was not humidified and air was partially humidified. Besides, by integrating the PEMFC and the humidifier into a single stack, considerable space for tubing between them was saved. Also, the hydrogen generator operated well with the PEMFC system and allowed for effective fuel storing and refueling. In addition, due to the efficient hybrid control of PEMFC and battery, start-up time was significantly shortened and capacity of PEMFC was reduced, resulting in compactness of the power system. In conclusion, a 600 W PEMFC power system was developed and successfully operated with the robot. Through development and evaluation of the PEMFC power system, the possibility of PEMFC as a novel power source for the hazardous mission robot was verified.


Energy ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1898-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.I. San Martin ◽  
I. Zamora ◽  
J.J. San Martin ◽  
V. Aperribay ◽  
E. Torres ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1059-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Moliner ◽  
M. J. Lázaro ◽  
L. Calvillo ◽  
D. Sebastián ◽  
Y. Echegoyen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Scott A. Kenner ◽  
Nicholas M. Josefik ◽  
Scott M. Lux ◽  
James L. Knight ◽  
Melissa K. White ◽  
...  

Background: The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (ERDC-CERL) continues to manage The Department of Defense (DoD) Residential Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Demonstration Project. This project was funded by the United States Congress for fiscal years 2001 through 2004. A fleet of 91 residential-scale PEM fuel cells, ranging in size from 1 to 5 kW, has been demonstrated at various U.S. DoD facilities around the world. Approach: The performance of the fuel cells has been monitored over a 12-month field demonstration period. A detailed analysis has been performed cataloging the component failures, investigating the mean time of the failures, and the mean time between failures. A discussion of the lifespan and failure modes of selected fuel cell components, based on component type, age, and usage will be provided. This analysis also addresses fuel cell stack life for both primary and back-up power systems. Several fuels were used throughout the demonstration, including natural gas, propane, and hydrogen. A distinction will be made on any variances in performance based on the input fuel stock. Summary: This analysis will provide an overview of the ERDC-CERL PEM demonstration fuel cell applications and the corresponding data from the field demonstrations. Special emphasis will be placed on the components, fuel cell stack life, and input fuel characteristics of the systems demonstrated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document