scholarly journals Nested Group Testing Procedures for Screening

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yaakov Malinovsky ◽  
Paul S. Albert
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Žilinskas ◽  
Algirdas Lančinskas ◽  
Mario R. Guarracino

AbstractDuring the COVID-19 pandemic it is essential to test as many people as possible, in order to detect early outbreaks of the infection. Present testing solutions are based on the extraction of RNA from patients using oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs, and then testing with real-time PCR for the presence of specific RNA filaments identifying the virus. This approach is limited by the availability of reactants, trained technicians and laboratories. One of the ways to speed up the testing procedures is a group testing, where the swabs of multiple patients are grouped together and tested. In this paper we propose to use the group testing technique in conjunction with an advanced replication scheme in which each patient is allocated in two or more groups to reduce the total numbers of tests and to allow testing of even larger numbers of people. Under mild assumptions, a 13 ×  average reduction of tests can be achieved compared to individual testing without delay in time.


2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaul K. Bar-Lev ◽  
Wolfgang Stadje ◽  
Frank A. Van der Duyn Schouten

Author(s):  
Julius Žilinskas ◽  
Algirdas Lančinskas ◽  
Mario R. Guarracino

AbstractIn absence of a vaccine or antiviral drugs for the COVID-19 pandemic, it becomes urgent to test for positiveness to the virus as many people as possible, in order to detect early outbreaks of the infection. Present testing solutions are based on the extraction of RNA from patients using oropharyngeal (OP) and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, and then testing with real-time PCR for the presence of specific RNA filaments identifying the virus. This approach is limited by the availability of reactants, trained technicians and laboratories. To speed up the testing procedures, some attempts have been done on group testing, which means that the swabs of multiple patients are grouped together and tested. Here we propose to use this technique in conjunction with a combinatorial replication scheme in which each patient is allocated in two or more groups to reduce total numbers of tests and to allow testing of even larger numbers of people. Under mild assumptions, a 13× average reduction of tests can be achieved.


1973 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Thomas ◽  
B. S. Pasternack ◽  
S. J. Vacirca ◽  
D. L. Thompson

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio M. Verdun ◽  
Tim Fuchs ◽  
Pavol Harar ◽  
Dennis Elbrächter ◽  
David S. Fischer ◽  
...  

Background: Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, demand for diagnostic testing has increased drastically, resulting in shortages of necessary materials to conduct the tests and overwhelming the capacity of testing laboratories. The supply scarcity and capacity limits affect test administration: priority must be given to hospitalized patients and symptomatic individuals, which can prevent the identification of asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals and hence effective tracking and tracing policies. We describe optimized group testing strategies applicable to SARS-CoV-2 tests in scenarios tailored to the current COVID-19 pandemic and assess significant gains compared to individual testing.Methods: We account for biochemically realistic scenarios in the context of dilution effects on SARS-CoV-2 samples and consider evidence on specificity and sensitivity of PCR-based tests for the novel coronavirus. Because of the current uncertainty and the temporal and spatial changes in the prevalence regime, we provide analysis for several realistic scenarios and propose fast and reliable strategies for massive testing procedures.Key Findings: We find significant efficiency gaps between different group testing strategies in realistic scenarios for SARS-CoV-2 testing, highlighting the need for an informed decision of the pooling protocol depending on estimated prevalence, target specificity, and high- vs. low-risk population. For example, using one of the presented methods, all 1.47 million inhabitants of Munich, Germany, could be tested using only around 141 thousand tests if the infection rate is below 0.4% is assumed. Using 1 million tests, the 6.69 million inhabitants from the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, could be tested as long as the infection rate does not exceed 1%. Moreover, we provide an interactive web application, available at www.grouptexting.com, for visualizing the different strategies and designing pooling schemes according to specific prevalence scenarios and test configurations.Interpretation: Altogether, this work may help provide a basis for an efficient upscaling of current testing procedures, which takes the population heterogeneity into account and is fine-grained towards the desired study populations, e.g., mild/asymptomatic individuals vs. symptomatic ones but also mixtures thereof.Funding: German Science Foundation (DFG), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF, and Austrian Science Fund (FWF).


1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Jon Higgins

Almost all research in mathematics education is predicated on the use of tests and group testing procedures to measure important variables. Because of this. readers of JRME should be particularly interested in two recent articles that suggest that test performance may depend upon interest factors to a greater degree than we have previously suspected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document