Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Risk Assessment and Genetic Counseling

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Rachel Webster ◽  
Sarah A. Bannon ◽  
Samuel M. Hyde ◽  
Ashley H. Woodson ◽  
Nancy Yi‐Qian You ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Si Ming Fung ◽  
R. Ryanne Wu ◽  
Rachel A. Myers ◽  
Jasper Goh ◽  
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The presence of hereditary cancer syndromes in cancer patients can have an impact on current clinical care and post-treatment prevention and surveillance measures. Several barriers inhibit identification of hereditary cancer syndromes in routine practice. This paper describes the impact of using a patient-facing family health history risk assessment platform on the identification and referral of breast cancer patients to genetic counselling services. Methods This was a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study completed in breast cancer clinics. English-literate patients not previously referred for genetic counselling and/or gone through genetic testing were offered enrollment. Consented participants were provided educational materials on family health history collection, entered their family health history into the platform and completed a satisfaction survey. Upon completion, participants and their clinicians were given personalized risk reports. Chart abstraction was done to identify actions taken by patients, providers and genetic counsellors. Results Of 195 patients approached, 102 consented and completed the study (mean age 55.7, 100 % women). Sixty-six (65 %) met guideline criteria for genetic counseling of which 24 (36 %) were referred for genetic counseling. Of those referred, 13 (54 %) participants attended and eight (33 %) completed genetic testing. On multivariate logistic regression, referral was not associated with age, cancer stage, or race but was associated with clinical provider (p = 0.041). Most providers (71 %) had higher referral rates during the study compared to prior. The majority of participants found the experience useful (84 %), were more aware of their health risks (83 %), and were likely to recommend using a patient-facing platform to others (69 %). Conclusions 65 % of patients attending breast cancer clinics in this study are at-risk for hereditary conditions based on current guidelines. Using a patient-facing risk assessment platform enhances the ability to identify these patients systematically and with widespread acceptability and recognized value by patients. As only a third of at-risk participants received referrals for genetic counseling, further understanding barriers to referral is needed to optimize hereditary risk assessment in oncology practices. Trial Registration NIH Clinical Trials registry, NCT04639934. Registered Nov 23, 2020 -- Retrospectively registered.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (31) ◽  
pp. 3544-3549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen E. Mork ◽  
Y. Nancy You ◽  
Jun Ying ◽  
Sarah A. Bannon ◽  
Patrick M. Lynch ◽  
...  

Purpose Established guidelines recommend evaluation for hereditary cancer syndromes in patients younger than 50 years diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). This group has been well described in the literature; however, patients diagnosed as adolescents and young adults are not well represented in CRC studies. Here, we define the clinical profile, including the extent of hereditary cancer syndromes and family history of cancer, in patients diagnosed with CRC at age 35 or younger. Patients and Methods We reviewed patients who underwent genetic counseling at our institution during 5 years (2009 to 2013). Data were collected regarding demographics, clinicopathologic information, tumor and genetic testing, and family history. Patients with an identified hereditary cancer syndrome were compared with those without a syndrome. Results Of the 193 patients with evaluable data, 35% had an identifiable hereditary cancer syndrome, including 23 with Lynch syndrome, 22 with mutation-negative Lynch syndrome, 16 with familial adenomatous polyposis, two with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, two with biallelic MUTYH mutations, and one with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Patients without a hereditary syndrome more frequently presented with metastatic disease, whereas patients with a syndrome were more likely to present at earlier stages and to have a family history of cancer. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of the hereditary syndromes (19%) were diagnosed in individuals with no family history of the disease. Conclusion We conclude that patients diagnosed with CRC at age 35 years or younger should receive genetic counseling regardless of their family history and phenotype.


Author(s):  
Carrie L. Snyder ◽  
Heather Hampel ◽  
Henry T. Lynch

Thanks to the veritably logarithmic advances in the molecular genetics of many emerging hereditary cancer syndromes, genetic counselling has become of paramount importance. It is a key element of the emerging concepts for patient education and management, which have become the clinical bedrock for diagnosis and management of hereditary cancer. Genetic counsellors have become proficient in the understanding of the complexities of molecular genetics in relation to hereditary cancer syndromes, demonstrating their ability both to supplement and replace the customary physician’s role in this overall process. We have used colorectal cancer, in particular Lynch syndrome, as a clinical genetic model based on the authors’ experience with diagnosis, DNA testing, and counselling of thousands of families for over four decades. Undoubtedly, the surface of the proverbial iceberg has barely been grazed in regard to the developments for the genetic counseling discipline.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Outi Kajula ◽  
Outi Kuismin ◽  
Maria Kääriäinen ◽  
Helvi Kyngäs

Background: Previous studies of genetic counseling (GC) for male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have focused on their level of satisfaction with the GC and its content. The aim of this study was to examine the GC experiences of male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and their suggestions for improving GC, more broadly.Methods: Data were collected by themed interviews of Finnish male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (n = 31), and subjected to inductive content analysis.Results: The results indicated that the participants had a mixture of both positive and negative experiences of GC regarding operational conditions at Departments of Clinical Genetics (DCGs) and the ability of the counselors’ (clinical geneticists or genetic nurses) to provide GC. Although the GC was implemented in a professional manner, according to the male participants, more concreate and illustrative information should be provided, and the counselors should receive additional training to provide such information and improve their communication skills.Conclusions: Based on results of the study we make some suggestions for tailored GC for male BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The results may facilitate development of a tentative model of GC that could be extended to broader categories of people at risk of hereditary cancer syndromes in the future.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260597
Author(s):  
Bettina Maria Zimmermann ◽  
David Martin Shaw ◽  
Bernice Elger ◽  
Insa Koné

Background Decision-making concerning predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is inherently complex. This study aims to investigate what kind of complexities adults undergoing genetic counseling in Switzerland experience, how they deal with them, and what heuristics they use during the decision-making process. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews with eighteen Swiss adults seeking genetic counseling for hereditary cancer syndrome genetic testing and two counseling physicians were conducted and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results Counselees stated that once they were aware of their eligibility for genetic testing they perceived an inevitable necessity to make a decision in a context of uncertainties. Some counselees perceived this decision as simple, others as very complex. High emotional involvement increased perceived complexity. We observed six heuristics that counselees used to facilitate their decision: Anticipating the test result; Focusing on consequences; Dealing with information; Interpreting disease risk; Using external guidance; and (Re-)Considering the general uncertainty of life. Limitations Our findings are limited to the context of predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. This qualitative study does not allow extrapolation of the relative frequency of which heuristics occur. Conclusions The use of heuristics is an inherent part of decision-making, particularly in the complex context of genetic testing for inherited cancer predisposition. However, some heuristics increase the risk of misinterpretation or exaggerated external influences. This may negatively impact informed decision-making. Thus, this study illustrates the importance of genetic counselors and medical professionals being aware of these heuristics and the individual manner in which they might be applied in the context of genetic testing decision-making. Findings may offer practical support to achieve this, as they inductively focus on the counselees’ perspective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document