The role of mental rotation and age in spatial perspective-taking tasks: when age does not impair perspective-taking performance

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 807-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana De Beni ◽  
Francesca Pazzaglia ◽  
Simona Gardini
Author(s):  
Amy M. Clements-Stephens ◽  
Katarina Vasiljevic ◽  
Alexandra J. Murray ◽  
Amy L. Shelton

Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Muto

Abstract. People can mentally rotate objects that resemble human bodies more efficiently than nonsense objects in the same/different judgment task. Previous studies proposed that this human-body advantage in mental rotation is mediated by one's projections of body axes onto a human-like object, implying that human-like objects elicit a strategy shift, from an object-based to an egocentric mental rotation. To test this idea, we investigated whether mental rotation performance involving a human-like object had a stronger association with spatial perspective-taking, which entails egocentric mental rotation, than a nonsense object. In the present study, female participants completed a chronometric mental rotation task with nonsense and human-like objects. Their spatial perspective-taking ability was then assessed using the Road Map Test and the Spatial Orientation Test. Mental rotation response times (RTs) were shorter for human-like than for nonsense objects, replicating previous research. More importantly, spatial perspective-taking had a stronger negative correlation with RTs for human-like than for nonsense objects. These findings suggest that human-like stimuli in the same/different mental rotation task induce a strategy shift toward efficient egocentric mental rotation.


Author(s):  
Xavier E. Job ◽  
Louise P. Kirsch ◽  
Malika Auvray

AbstractInformation can be perceived from a multiplicity of spatial perspectives, which is central to effectively understanding and interacting with our environment and other people. Sensory impairments such as blindness are known to impact spatial representations and perspective-taking is often thought of as a visual process. However, disturbed functioning of other sensory systems (e.g., vestibular, proprioceptive and auditory) can also influence spatial perspective-taking. These lines of research remain largely separate, yet together they may shed new light on the role that each sensory modality plays in this core cognitive ability. The findings to date reveal that spatial cognitive processes may be differently affected by various types of sensory loss. The visual system may be crucial for the development of efficient allocentric (object-to-object) representation; however, the role of vision in adopting another’s spatial perspective remains unclear. On the other hand, the vestibular and the proprioceptive systems likely play an important role in anchoring the perceived self to the physical body, thus facilitating imagined self-rotations required to adopt another’s spatial perspective. Findings regarding the influence of disturbed auditory functioning on perspective-taking are so far inconclusive and thus await further data. This review highlights that spatial perspective-taking is a highly plastic cognitive ability, as the brain is often able to compensate in the face of different sensory loss.


i-Perception ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 204166951769016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Arnold ◽  
Malika Auvray

In this study, we investigated whether adopting a head-centered perspective on the body is an embodied process by means of the graphesthesia task. This task consists of interpreting ambiguous tactile symbols from different spatial perspectives. The results revealed that symbols were more easily recognized when the mental rotation of the head toward the stimulated surface corresponded to physically possible, as opposed to impossible, body movements. Performance also decreased with increasing the amount of body movements that would be necessary to physically rotate the head. These results are in line with an embodied view of spatial perspective-taking, and, more generally, they highlight the important role the body plays in perception.


Cognition ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 191 ◽  
pp. 103987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Muto ◽  
Soyogu Matsushita ◽  
Kazunori Morikawa

1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-349
Author(s):  
Shinichiro SUGIMURA ◽  
Yoshiaki TAKEUCHI ◽  
Mineko IMAGAWA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document