scholarly journals Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Treatment Plans for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis–Associated and Idiopathic Chronic Anterior Uveitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila T. Angeles‐Han ◽  
Mindy S. Lo ◽  
Lauren A. Henderson ◽  
Melissa A. Lerman ◽  
Leslie Abramson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Anterior Uveitis ◽  
Rheumatology Research ◽  
Childhood Arthritis ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Research Alliance

scholarly journals Bayesian comparative effectiveness study of four consensus treatment plans for initial management of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: FiRst-Line Options for Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis Treatment (FROST)

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A Nigrovic ◽  
Timothy Beukelman ◽  
George Tomlinson ◽  
Brian M Feldman ◽  
Laura E Schanberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
First Line ◽  
Rheumatology Research ◽  
Childhood Arthritis ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Research Alliance ◽  
New Onset

Background: Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a rare febrile arthritis of childhood characterized by a potentially severe course, including prolonged glucocorticoid exposure, growth failure, destructive arthritis, and life-threatening macrophage activation syndrome. Early cytokine-blocking biologic therapy may improve long-term outcomes, although some systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients respond well to non-biologic treatment, leaving optimal management undefined. Consequently, treatment of new-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis by expert clinicians varies widely. Purpose: To describe a pragmatic, observational comparative effectiveness study that takes advantage of diversity in the management of a rare disease: FiRst-Line Options for Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis Treatment (FROST), comparing non-biologic and biologic consensus treatment plans for new-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis within the 60-center Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry (CARRA). Methods: FiRst-Line Options for Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis Treatment (FROST) is a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized study that compares four Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) consensus treatment plans for new-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: (1) glucocorticoids alone, (2) methotrexate, (3) interleukin-1 blockade, and (4) interleukin-6 blockade. Patients consenting to participation in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry are started on one of four Consensus Treatment Plans at the discretion of the treating physician. The outcome of primary interest is clinically inactive disease off glucocorticoids at 9 months, comparing non-biologic (Consensus Treatment Plans 1 + 2) versus biologic (Consensus Treatment Plans 3 + 4) strategies. Bayesian analytic methods will be employed to evaluate response rates, using propensity scoring to balance treatment groups for potential confounding. With 200 patients in a 2:1 ratio of biologic to non-biologic, there is a >90% probability of finding biologic consensus treatment plans more effective if the rate of clinically inactive disease is 30% higher than for non-biologic therapy. Additional outcomes include Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures and other parent-/patient-reported outcomes reported in real time using smartphone technology. Routine operation of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry will allow assessment of outcomes over at least 10 years. Results: FiRst-Line Options for Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis Treatment (FROST) began enrollment in November 2016. Limitations: The observational design may not provide balance in measured and unmeasured confounders. Use of consensus treatment plan (CTP) strategies at frequencies more unbalanced than predicted could reduce the chance of finding differences in efficacy. Conclusion: FiRst-Line Options for Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis Treatment (FROST) will provide the first prospective comparison of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance’s (CARRA’s) consensus-derived non-biologic versus biologic management strategies in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, performed in a real-world setting wherein each patient receives standard-of-care treatment selected by the treating physician. Outcomes include clinician- and patient-/family-reported outcomes, empowering both physician and patient decision making in new-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

scholarly journals Enthesitis-related Arthritis Is Associated with Higher Pain Intensity and Poorer Health Status in Comparison with Other Categories of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 2341-2351 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAMELA F. WEISS ◽  
TIMOTHY BEUKELMAN ◽  
LAURA E. SCHANBERG ◽  
YUKIKO KIMURA ◽  
ROBERT A. COLBERT
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Enthesitis Related Arthritis ◽  
Rheumatology Research ◽  
Childhood Arthritis ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Research Alliance

Objective.To assess the relative effect of clinical factors and medications on pain intensity, physical function, and health status in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).Methods.We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of data from children with JIA enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. We tested whether clinical characteristics of JIA were associated with pain intensity, physical function, and health status using multivariable linear and ordinal logistic regression.Results.During the study period, 2571 subjects with JIA enrolled in the CARRA Registry. Ratings of pain intensity, physical function, and health status differed significantly between JIA categories. In comparison to other categories of JIA, subjects with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) reported worse pain and function. In multivariable analyses, higher active joint count and current use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), biologics, or corticosteroids were associated with worse scores on all patient-reported measures. ERA and older age were significantly associated with higher pain intensity and poorer health status. Systemic JIA and uveitis were significantly associated with worse health status. Enthesitis, sacroiliac tenderness, and NSAID use were independently associated with increased pain intensity in ERA. The correlation was low between physician global assessment of disease activity and patient-reported pain intensity, physical function, and health status.Conclusion.Significant differences in pain intensity, physical function, and health status exist among JIA categories. These results suggest that current treatments may not be equally effective for particular disease characteristics more common in specific JIA categories, such as enthesitis or sacroiliac tenderness in ERA.

Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Clinical Treatment Plans for Juvenile Dermatomyositis with Persistent Skin Rash

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Huber ◽  
Susan Kim ◽  
Ann M. Reed ◽  
Ruy Carrasco ◽  
Brian M. Feldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Rash ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Juvenile Dermatomyositis ◽  
Clinical Treatment ◽  
Muscle Disease ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Rheumatology Research ◽  
Childhood Arthritis ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Research Alliance

Objective.Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in children. While outcomes are generally thought to be good, persistence of skin rash is a common problem. The goal of this study was to describe the development of clinical treatment plans (CTP) for children with JDM characterized by persistent skin rash despite complete resolution of muscle involvement.Methods.The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, a North American consortium of pediatric rheumatologists and other healthcare providers, used a combination of Delphi surveys and nominal group consensus meetings to develop CTP that reflected consensus on typical treatments for patients with JDM with persistent skin rash.Results.Consensus was reached on patient characteristics and outcome assessment. Patients should have previously received corticosteroids and methotrexate (MTX). Three consensus treatment plans were developed. Plan A added intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) if it was not already being used. Plan B added mycophenolate mofetil, while Plan C added cyclosporine. Continuation of previous treatments, including corticosteroids, MTX, and IVIG, was permitted in plans B and C.Conclusion.Three consensus CTP were developed for use in children with JDM and persistent skin rash despite complete resolution of muscle disease. These CTP reflect typical treatment approaches and are not to be considered treatment recommendations or standard of care. Using prospective data collection and statistical methods to account for nonrandom treatment assignment, it is expected that these CTP will be used to allow treatment comparisons, and ultimately determine the best treatment for these patients.

scholarly journals Patterns of etanercept use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Beukelman ◽  
Aimee Lougee ◽  
Roland A. Matsouaka ◽  
David Collier ◽  
Dax G. Rumsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Rheumatology Research ◽  
Childhood Arthritis ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Persistence Rates ◽  
Biologic Dmard ◽  
Parametric Statistics ◽  
Research Alliance ◽  
Rheumatic Drug

Abstract Background We aimed to characterize etanercept (ETN) use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. Methods The CARRA Registry is a convenience cohort of patients with paediatric onset rheumatic diseases, including JIA. JIA patients treated with ETN for whom the month and year of ETN initiation were available were included. Patterns of ETN and methotrexate (MTX) use were categorized as follows: combination therapy (ETN and MTX started concurrently), step-up therapy (MTX started first and ETN added later), switchers (MTX started and then stopped when or before ETN started), MTX add-on (ETN started first and MTX added later), and ETN only (no MTX use). Data were described using parametric and non-parametric statistics as appropriate. Results Two thousand thirty-two of the five thousand six hundred forty-one patients with JIA met inclusion criteria (74% female, median age at diagnosis 6.0 years [interquartile range 2.0, 11.0]. Most patients (66.9%) were treated with a non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), primarily MTX, prior to ETN. There was significant variability in patterns of MTX use prior to starting ETN. Step-up therapy was the most common approach. Only 34.0% of persistent oligoarticular JIA patients continued treatment with a non-biologic DMARD 3 months or more after ETN initiation. ETN persistence overall was 66.3, 49.4, and 37.3% at 24, 36 and 48 months respectively. ETN persistence among spondyloarthritis patients (enthesitis related arthritis and psoriatic JIA) varied by MTX initiation pattern, with higher ETN persistence rates in those who initiated combination therapy (68.9%) and switchers/ETN only (73.3%) patients compared to step-up (65.4%) and MTX add-on (51.1%) therapy. Conclusion This study characterizes contemporary patterns of ETN use in the CARRA Registry. Treatment was largely in keeping with American College of Rheumatology guidelines.

Biologic Switching among Non-Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients: A Cohort Study in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

2020 ◽  
pp. jrheum.200437
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Mannion ◽  
Fenglong Xie ◽  
Daniel B. Horton ◽  
Sarah Ringold ◽  
Colleen K. Correll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Rheumatology Research ◽  
Childhood Arthritis ◽  
Research Alliance

Objective Biologic medications have significantly improved disease control and outcomes of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Current treatment recommendations suggest escalating therapy; including changing biologics if needed, when inactive or low disease activity is not attained. The patterns and reasons for switching biologics in clinical practice in North America are not well described. Methods We used the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry and included individuals with JIA if they newly started a biologic after January 1, 2008 and had at least 12 months of subsequent observable time. Subjects with systemic JIA were excluded. We compared characteristics of switchers and non-switchers using chi-square for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum testing for continuous variables and used linear regression for time analysis. Results 1361 eligible children with JIA in the registry started a biologic (94% tumor necrosis factor TNF inhibitors [TNFi]). Median follow-up time was 30 months, and 349 (26%) switched biologics. Among biologic switchers, ineffectiveness/disease flare was the most common reason for switch (202, 58%). The most common documented switch was from etanercept to another TNFi (221, 63%). The median time to switch to a second biologic decreased substantially from 55.2 months in 2008 to 7.2 months in 2016. Conclusion In a multicenter cohort of patients with JIA starting a biologic, one-quarter switched to a second biologic, and the time to switching decreased in recent years. Additional studies should evaluate the outcomes and optimal timing of switching and preferred sequence of biologic use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document