Multilevel factors predict medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-month cohort study

Non-adherence challenges efficacy and costs of healthcare. Knowledge of the underlying factors is essential to design effective intervention strategies.ObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence of treatment adherence in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate its predictors.MethodsA 6-month prospective cohort study of patients with RA selected by systematic stratified sampling (33% on first disease-modifying rheumatic drug (DMARD), 33% on second-line DMARD and 33% on biologics). The outcome measure was treatment adherence, defined by a score greater than 80% both in the Compliance Questionnaire in Rheumatology and the Reported Adherence to Medication scale, and was estimated with 95% CIs. Predictive factors included sociodemographic, psychological, clinical, drug-related, patient–doctor relationship related and logistic. Their effect on 6-month adherence was examined by multilevel logistic models adjusted for baseline covariates.Results180 patients were recruited (77% women, mean age 60.8). The prevalence of adherence was 59.1% (95% CI 48.1% to 71.8%). Patients on biologics showed higher adherence and perceived a higher medication need than the others; patients on second-line DMARDs had experienced more adverse events than the others. The variables explaining adherence in the final multivariate model were the type of treatment prescribed (second-line DMARDs OR=5.22, and biologics OR=3.76), agreement on treatment (OR=4.57), having received information on treatment adaptation (OR=1.42) and the physician perception of patient trust (OR=1.58). These effects were independent of disease activity.ConclusionTreatment adherence in RA is far from complete. Psychological, communicational and logistic factors influence treatment adherence in RA to a greater extent than sociodemographic or clinical factors.

The Wonderful DMARD with Multiple Toxicities

Methotrexate is a type of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). It is used to reduce activity of the immune system for people who have certain conditions. Methotrexate is a chemotherapy agent and immune system suppressant. Its use may be limited by concerns regarding its adverse reactions. The occurrence of adverse drug reactions in some cases leads to the therapy discontinuation. Although adverse drug reactions (ADR) of methotrexate generally do not pose a serious threat to the health of patients and a reduction in the dose of methotrexate leads to their elimination, in some cases severe toxicities of the drug occur unpredictably. These facts explain the need for close monitoring of the patient’s condition and the identification of potential risk factors for drug toxicity on the part of different organs and functional systems. The purpose of this review is to detail about safety and tolerability of methotrexate.

Genetic variations in methotrexate metabolic pathway genes influence methotrexate responses in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Malaysia

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most widely used disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Many studies have attempted to understand the genetic risk factors that affect the therapeutic outcomes in RA patients treated with MTX. Unlike other studies that focus on the populations of Caucasians, Indian and east Asian countries, this study investigated the impacts of six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are hypothesized to affect the outcomes of MTX treatment in Malaysian RA patients. A total of 647 RA patients from three ethnicities (NMalay = 153; NChinese = 326; NIndian = 168) who received MTX monotherapy (minimum 15 mg per week) were sampled from three hospitals in Malaysia. SNPs were genotyped in patients using TaqMan real-time PCR assay. Data obtained were statistically analysed for the association between SNPs and MTX efficacy and toxicity. Analysis of all 647 RA patients indicated that none of the SNPs has influence on either MTX efficacy or MTX toxicity according to the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression. However, stratification by self-identified ancestries revealed that two out of six SNPs, ATIC C347G (rs2372536) (OR=0.5478, 95%CI=0.3396-0.8835, p=0.01321) and ATIC T675C (rs4673993) (OR=0.5247, 95%CI=0.3248-0.8478, p=0.008111), were significantly associated with MTX adequate response in RA patients with Malay ancestry (p < 0.05). As for the MTX toxicity, no significant association was identified for any SNPs selected in this study. Taken all together, ATIC C347G and ATIC T675C can be further evaluated on their impact in MTX efficacy using larger ancestry-specific cohort, and also incorporating high-order gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug Prescription Baihu-Guizhi Decoction Attenuates Rheumatoid Arthritis via Suppressing Toll-Like Receptor 4-mediated NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation

As a traditional Chinese medicine-originated disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug prescription, Baihu-Guizhi decoction (BHGZD) is extensively used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a satisfying therapeutic efficacy. Mechanically, our previous data indicated that BHGZD may ameliorate RA partially by restoring the balance of the “inflammation-immune” system through regulating the TLR4-c-Fos-IL2-TNF-alpha axis. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has been revealed to be involved in the activation of the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome complex. Thus, the aim of the current study was to determine the regulatory effects of BHGZD on the TLR4–mediated inflammasome activation during RA progression based on the modified adjuvant-induced arthritis model (AIA-M) and the lipopolysaccharide/adenosine triphosphate (LPS/ATP)–induced pyroptosis cellular models. As a result, oral administration of BHGZD exhibited prominent improvement in the disease severity of AIA-M rats, such as reducing the redness and swelling of joints, arthritis incidence, arthritic scores, and diameter of the limb and increasing pain thresholds. In line with the in vivo findings, BHGZD treatment effectively inhibited the LPS/ATP–induced pyroptosis of both Raw264.7 macrophage and MH7A cells in vitro by reducing pyroptotic cell death morphology (swollen cells) and decreasing propidium iodide–positive and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP-fluorescein nick end labeling (TUNEL)–positive cells. Notably, the increased expression levels of TLR4, NLRP3, interleukin 1β, and interleukin 18 proteins and the elevated activities of caspase-1 and lactic dehydrogenase in in vivo and in vitro disease models were markedly reversed by the treatment with BHGZD. In conclusion, the above findings proved the immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activities of BHGZD, especially in pyroptosis, which may be attributed to the activation of TLR4–mediated NLRP3 inflammasome signaling.

Patterns of etanercept use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

Background We aimed to characterize etanercept (ETN) use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. Methods The CARRA Registry is a convenience cohort of patients with paediatric onset rheumatic diseases, including JIA. JIA patients treated with ETN for whom the month and year of ETN initiation were available were included. Patterns of ETN and methotrexate (MTX) use were categorized as follows: combination therapy (ETN and MTX started concurrently), step-up therapy (MTX started first and ETN added later), switchers (MTX started and then stopped when or before ETN started), MTX add-on (ETN started first and MTX added later), and ETN only (no MTX use). Data were described using parametric and non-parametric statistics as appropriate. Results Two thousand thirty-two of the five thousand six hundred forty-one patients with JIA met inclusion criteria (74% female, median age at diagnosis 6.0 years [interquartile range 2.0, 11.0]. Most patients (66.9%) were treated with a non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), primarily MTX, prior to ETN. There was significant variability in patterns of MTX use prior to starting ETN. Step-up therapy was the most common approach. Only 34.0% of persistent oligoarticular JIA patients continued treatment with a non-biologic DMARD 3 months or more after ETN initiation. ETN persistence overall was 66.3, 49.4, and 37.3% at 24, 36 and 48 months respectively. ETN persistence among spondyloarthritis patients (enthesitis related arthritis and psoriatic JIA) varied by MTX initiation pattern, with higher ETN persistence rates in those who initiated combination therapy (68.9%) and switchers/ETN only (73.3%) patients compared to step-up (65.4%) and MTX add-on (51.1%) therapy. Conclusion This study characterizes contemporary patterns of ETN use in the CARRA Registry. Treatment was largely in keeping with American College of Rheumatology guidelines.

Heterogeneity in patient characteristics and differences in treatment across four Canadian rheumatoid arthritis cohorts

Objective To compare clinical characteristics and treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) across 4 Canadian cohorts. Methods The four longitudinal cohorts included: The Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) (n=2878); Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) (n=3734); RHUMADATA® (Quebec, n=2890), and the Rheum4U Precision Health Registry (Calgary, n=709). Data were from cohort inception (range 1998-2016) to 2020. Clinical characteristics and drug treatments were summarized descriptively. Results 10,211 patients with RA were included. The percentage of patients who entered the cohort with early RA ( ≤ 2 years of disease at enrolment) ranged from 29% (Rheum4U) to 100% (CATCH). Mean age (55 years), sex (74% female) and seropositivity (69%) were similar between cohorts. At the time of initial disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) use, median disease activity scores (DAS-28) varied, ranging from 2.99 (Rheum4U) to 5.19 (CATCH), but were more similar at the time of the first DMARD switch (range:3.57-5.03), first biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD (bDAMRD, tsDMARD) use (range:4.01-4.67) and second bDAMRD or tsDMARD (range:3.71-4.39). The initial DMARD was most commonly methotrexate, either in monotherapy (32%, range:18%-40%) or dual therapy (34%, range:29%- 42%). The first DMARD switch was to another DMARD monotherapy in 20% (range:10%- 32%), dual therapy in 49% (range:39%-56%), and bDMARD or tsDMARD in 24% (range:15%- 28%). The first bDMARD was an anti-TNF in 79% (range:78%-85%). Conclusion Canadian RA cohorts demonstrate some heterogeneity in treatment which could reflect differences in inclusion criteria, calendar year, or regional differences. This project is a first step towards conducting harmonized analyses across Canadian RA cohorts.

Synergistic Activity of Colistin Combined With Auranofin Against Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Colistin-resistant (Col-R) bacteria are steadily increasing, and are extremely difficult to treat. New drugs or therapies are urgently needed to treat infections caused by these pathogens. Combination therapy with colistin and other old drugs, is an important way to restore the activity of colistin. This study aimed to investigate the activity of colistin in combination with the anti-rheumatic drug auranofin against Col-R Gram-negative bacteria. The results of checkerboard analysis demonstrated that auranofin synergized with colistin against Col-R Gram-negative bacteria. Time-kill assays showed significant synergistic antimicrobial activity of colistin combined with auranofin. Electron microscopy revealed that the combination resulted in more cellular structural alterations compared to each drug alone. Auranofin enhanced the therapeutic effectiveness of colistin in mouse peritoneal infection models. These results suggested that the combination of colistin and auranofin might be a potential alternative for the treatment of Col-R Gram-negative bacterial infections.