scholarly journals Developing best practices for outreach for the Asian Cohort for Alzheimer’s Disease (ACAD) study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Haung Yu ◽  
Marian Tzuang ◽  
Carlos Thomas ◽  
Briana Vogel ◽  
Anna T Lu ◽  
...  
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (S16) ◽  
pp. 34-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachelle S. Doody

Today’s therapies must be put in the context of both currently available treatments as well as treatment trials with exciting potential for use in the near future. Current clinical trial methodologies do not allow for clear separation of symptomatic treatments from disease-modifying therapies; it may be unproductive to maintain this distinction given the current range of treatments available. A more currently relevant focus is added value. Therapies should aim to provide added value through incremental benefits above and beyond existing treatments, as well as enduring benefits.Alzheimer’s disease (AD) treatment guidelines are not used by physicians only. Healthcare payers often make use of these guidelines to delimit coverage. Cost concerns will also impact AD treatments after generic cholinesterase inhibitors are made available; it is widely believed that a great number of patients will switch to generics. Therefore, treatment guidelines must account for the possible adverse effects of switching therapies as well as the desirability of persistent treatment. There are many AD treatment guidelines, among them the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Management of Dementia Guidelines, which are currently being revised. The Institute for the Study on Aging (ISOA) Management of Alzheimer’s Disease in Managed Care Guideline also presents a different approach for a different audience.The first step to creating evidence-based best practices guidelines is to determine what is meant by “evidence.” A system of classification exists for examining forms of evidence: Class I evidence is provided by one or more well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials, including overviews or meta-analyses of such trials. Class II evidence is provided by well-designed observational studies with concurrent controls; for example, case-control studies that generate hypotheses about epidemiologic associations. Class III evidence is provided by expert opinion, case series, case reports, and studies with historical controls.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana W Shineman ◽  
Guriqbal S Basi ◽  
Jennifer L Bizon ◽  
Carol A Colton ◽  
Barry D Greenberg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S592-S593
Author(s):  
Karen Rose ◽  
Ruth Palan Lopez

Abstract Despite efforts to increase awareness and education about Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, persons with dementia and their family caregivers experience stigma. Dementia related stigma is associated with negative repercussions for those with the disease and their family caregivers. In our prior work, we identified shame as a mechanism by which stigma is enacted and results in isolating and delaying access to supportive services for family caregivers. As such, stigma may influence decisions to participate in research studies. Healthcare providers, friends and family, and society, in general, play roles that further perpetuate stigma in dementia. Best practices from the literature, coupled with our experiences and findings in recruiting persons with dementia and their family caregivers in to research studies will be examined.


2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Inês Vigo ◽  
Luis Coelho ◽  
Sara Reis

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has paramount importance due to its rising prevalence, the impact on the patient and society, and the related healthcare costs. However, current diagnostic techniques are not designed for frequent mass screening, delaying therapeutic intervention and worsening prognoses. To be able to detect AD at an early stage, ideally at a pre-clinical stage, speech analysis emerges as a simple low-cost non-invasive procedure. Objectives: In this work it is our objective to do a systematic review about speech-based detection and classification of Alzheimer’s Disease with the purpose of identifying the most effective algorithms and best practices. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed from Jan 2015 up to May 2020 using ScienceDirect, PubMed and DBLP. Articles were screened by title, abstract and full text as needed. A manual complementary search among the references of the included papers was also performed. Inclusion criteria and search strategies were defined a priori. Results: We were able: to identify the main resources that can support the development of decision support systems for AD, to list speech features that are correlated with the linguistic and acoustic footprint of the disease, to recognize the data models that can provide robust results and to observe the performance indicators that were reported. Discussion: A computational system with the adequate elements combination, based on the identified best-practices, can point to a whole new diagnostic approach, leading to better insights about AD symptoms and its disease patterns, creating conditions to promote a longer life span as well as an improvement in patient quality of life. The clinically relevant results that were identified can be used to establish a reference system and help to define research guidelines for future developments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li‐San Wang ◽  
Boon Lead Tee ◽  
Yian Gu ◽  
Clara Li ◽  
Briana Vogel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Howard M. Fillit ◽  
Rachelle Smith Doody ◽  
Kimberly Binaso ◽  
Glenna M. Crooks ◽  
Steven H. Ferris ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document