scholarly journals Cerebrospinal fluid and brain PET measures of synaptic density glycoprotein 2A: Biomarkers of synaptic density in Alzheimer’s disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P. Mecca ◽  
Nicholas J. Ashton ◽  
Ming‐Kai Chen ◽  
Ryan S. O'Dell ◽  
Mika Naganawa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Utz ◽  
Judith Berner ◽  
Luis Enrique Muñoz ◽  
Timo Jan Oberstein ◽  
Johannes Kornhuber ◽  
...  

IntroductionIn Alzheimer’s disease, the severity of symptoms is linked to a loss of synaptic density and the spread of pathologically hyperphosphorylated tau. The established cerebrospinal fluid markers Aβ, tau and phospho-tau reflect the histopathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease but do not indicate disease progression. Such markers are of special interest, especially for trials of disease modifying drugs. Microvesicles are produced by stressed cells and reflect part of the metabolism of their cells of origin. Therefore, we investigated microvesicles of neuronal origin in cerebrospinal fluid.Materials and MethodsWe used flow cytometry to analyze microvesicles carrying tau, phospho-tau-Thr181, phospho-tau-Ser202Thr205, synaptophysin, and SNAP-25 in the cerebrospinal fluid of 19 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and 15 non-inflammatory neurological disease controls.ResultsThe percentages of synaptophysin-bearing microvesicles were significantly higher in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease than in the CSF of non-inflammatory neurological disease controls. Tau, phospho-tau-Thr181, phospho-tau-Ser202Thr205, and SNAP-25 did not differ between the groups. The percentages of synaptophysin-bearing vesicles distinguished patients with Alzheimer’s disease from the controls (AUC = 0.81).ConclusionThe loss of synapses in Alzheimer’s disease may be reflected by synaptophysin-bearing microvesicles in the cerebrospinal fluid. Future studies are needed to investigate the possibility of using these MVs as a marker to determine the activity of Alzheimer’s disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P. Mecca ◽  
Nicholas J Ashton ◽  
Ming‐Kai Chen ◽  
Ryan S. O'Dell ◽  
Mika Naganawa ◽  
...  

HAPS Educator ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43
Author(s):  
Brie Paddock ◽  
Kimberly Canfield ◽  
Sarah Cooper

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. P1224-P1225
Author(s):  
Andrea Lessa Benedet ◽  
Antoine Leuzy ◽  
Tharick A. Pascoal ◽  
Nicholas J. Ashton ◽  
Sulantha Mathotaarachchi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 174077452110344
Author(s):  
Michelle M Nuño ◽  
Joshua D Grill ◽  
Daniel L Gillen ◽  

Background/Aims: The focus of Alzheimer’s disease studies has shifted to earlier disease stages, including mild cognitive impairment. Biomarker inclusion criteria are often incorporated into mild cognitive impairment clinical trials to identify individuals with “prodromal Alzheimer’s disease” to ensure appropriate drug targets and enrich for participants likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease dementia. The use of these eligibility criteria may affect study power. Methods: We investigated outcome variability and study power in the setting of proof-of-concept prodromal Alzheimer’s disease trials that incorporate cerebrospinal fluid levels of total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated (p-tau) as primary outcomes and how differing biomarker inclusion criteria affect power. We used data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to model trial scenarios and to estimate the variance and within-subject correlation of total and phosphorylated tau. These estimates were then used to investigate the differences in study power for trials considering these two surrogate outcomes. Results: Patient characteristics were similar for all eligibility criteria. The lowest outcome variance and highest within-subject correlation were obtained when phosphorylated tau was used as an eligibility criterion, compared to amyloid beta or total tau, regardless of whether total tau or phosphorylated tau were used as primary outcomes. Power increased when eligibility criteria were broadened to allow for enrollment of subjects with either low amyloid beta or high phosphorylated tau. Conclusion: Specific biomarker inclusion criteria may impact statistical power in trials using total tau or phosphorylated tau as the primary outcome. In concert with other important considerations such as treatment target and population of clinical interest, these results may have implications to the integrity and efficiency of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease trial designs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. S47-S48
Author(s):  
Ryan O'Dell ◽  
Albert Higgins-Chen ◽  
Dhruva Gupta ◽  
Ming-Kai Chen ◽  
Mika Naganawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document