Use of individual feedback during human gross anatomy course for enhancing professional behaviors in doctor of physical therapy students

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 324-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Youdas ◽  
David A. Krause ◽  
Nathan J. Hellyer ◽  
Aaron B. Rindflesch ◽  
John H. Hollman
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Gross Anatomy ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
Professional Behaviors ◽  
Human Gross Anatomy ◽  
Doctor Of Physical Therapy ◽  
Individual Feedback ◽  
Gross Anatomy Course

Peer teaching among physical therapy students during human gross anatomy: Perceptions of peer teachers and students

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Youdas ◽  
Brianna L. Hoffarth ◽  
Scott R. Kohlwey ◽  
Christine M. Kramer ◽  
Jaime L. Petro
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Gross Anatomy ◽  
Peer Teaching ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
Human Gross Anatomy ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Peer Teachers

scholarly journals Physical therapy students’ perceptions of team-based learning in gross anatomy using the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beven Livingston ◽  
Mary Lundy ◽  
Shana Harrington
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Gross Anatomy ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
Positive Experience ◽  
Team Based Learning ◽  
Gross Anatomy Course ◽  
Successful Academic

Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess physical therapy student perceptions of team-based learning (TBL) in a graduate level gross anatomy course using the TBL Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI). Methods: The TBL-SAI was administered to 85 Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students, comprising three cohorts (classes of 2013, 2014 and 2015), who successfully completed a gross anatomy course where TBL was implemented. The TBL-SAI surveys 33 items, each rated from one (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree) and measures three subscales: Students' Perceptions of Accountability, Preference for Lecture or TBL, and Student Satisfaction. Results: The means for each subscale and the total TBL-SAI score for each cohort fell above the neutral score. The 2015 group (mean = 37.97, 95% CI [35.67, 40.26]) reported significantly higher satisfaction than that of the 2013 group (mean = 32.71, 95% CI [30.31, 35.05]) and the 2014 group (mean = 33.11, 95% CI [30.69, 35.53]). The 2015 group (mean = 125.3, 95% CI [120.6, 130.3]) also had a significantly higher total score than that of the 2013 group (mean = 115.6, 95% CI [110.5, 120.5]).Conclusion: The physical therapy students reported an overall positive experience in using TBL to learn gross anatomy in terms of accountability, preference for learning mode, and satisfaction. This positive experience with TBL was accompanied by their successful academic performance. Given the traits and learning preferences in this generation of graduate students, TBL could be a teaching method that is received positively elsewhere and results in successful academic performance and learning.

Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Doctor of Physical Therapy Students

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Bogardus ◽  
Mary Blackinton ◽  
Bini Litwin ◽  
Terri Morrow Nelson ◽  
Katy Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
Doctor Of Physical Therapy

scholarly journals Grit and Academic Performance in Doctor of Physical Therapy Students

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Richardson ◽  
Michael Scotto ◽  
MayAnne Belcina ◽  
Richa Patel ◽  
Kevin Wiener
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Grade Point Average ◽  
Graduate School ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
School Grade ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Grade Point ◽  
Doctor Of Physical Therapy ◽  
Therapy Program

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a physical therapy student’s level of grit positively correlates to graduate school grade point average. Methods: Participants were a convenience sample recruited from the class of 2021 in the Doctor of Physical Therapy program at Franklin Pierce University in Goodyear, Arizona. Subjects completed the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) as a measure of grit. These scores were compared with participants’ graduate school grade point average using a Spearman Rho statistical test with data analysis completed using SPSS software. Results: 27 participants (15 males, 12 females) with mean grit score of 3.76 ± 0.48 and mean grade point average 3.72 ± 0.18. Spearman Rho correlation was .463 (p < .05). Conclusion: A significant moderate positive correlation between grit and graduate school grade point average in physical therapy students was found. These findings indicate preliminary evidence that may be useful for admissions considerations for DPT programs.

scholarly journals Physical therapy students’ perceptions of the educational environment at physical therapy institutes in Pakistan

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Muhammad Adeel ◽  
Asad Chaudhry
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Educational Environment ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Doctor Of Physical Therapy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Convenience Sampling

This study assessed doctor of physical therapy (DPT) students’ perceptions of the educational environment at public and private physical therapy institutes in Pakistan. This cross-sectional study was conducted at 6 physical therapy institutions in Punjab, Pakistan from April 2018 to December 2019. In total, 500 Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaires were distributed among DPT students identified through convenience sampling (response rate, 86.4%). The correlations between each item of the DREEM score were analyzed. The mean overall DREEM score was 128±19.63 for all 5 subscales (range, 33 to 166; standard error of the mean, 0.954). The correlations of atmosphere, learning, and self-perception with the overall educational environment were r=0.896, r=0.853, and r=0.846, respectively. Student-centered approaches were found to be more effective than teacher-centered approaches for promoting a positive educational environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document