Meta-analysis of the predictive value of C-reactive protein for infectious complications in abdominal surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 590-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Adamina ◽  
T. Steffen ◽  
I. Tarantino ◽  
U. Beutner ◽  
B. M. Schmied ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 258-266
Author(s):  
Yosuke Atsumi ◽  
Toru Aoyama ◽  
Keisuke Kazama ◽  
Masaaki Murakawa ◽  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
...  

Objective The study objective was to assess the predictive value of C-reactive protein (CRP) for the early detection of postoperative infectious complications (PICs) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Summary of Background Data The incidence of PICs after pancreaticoduodenectomy still remains high and a clinically relevant problem, despite improvements in the surgical procedure. Methods We examined 110 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary pancreatic cancer between 2006 and 2014. The predictive value was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Clinical and laboratory data, including CRP, were analyzed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify predictors of PICs of grade III or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results PICs of grade III or higher occurred in 13 patients [11.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6.45%–19.36%]. CRP level on postoperative day 3 (POD 3) was a good predictor of PICs (AUC, 0.815; 95% CI, 0.651–0.980), showing the highest accuracy among clinical and laboratory data. A cutoff value of 13.2 mg/dL yielded a sensitivity of 0.846 and a specificity of 0.794. On multivariate analysis, a POD 3 CRP level of 13.2 mg/dL or higher (odds ratio, 20.0; 95% CI, 4.07–97.9; P = 0.002) was a significant predictor of PICs after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Conclusions CRP elevation above 13.2 mg/dL on POD 3 is a significant predictive factor for PICs and should prompt an intense clinical search and therapeutic approach for PICs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. AB137-AB137
Author(s):  
Noel Edward Donlon ◽  
Helen Mohan ◽  
Ross Free ◽  
Christina Fleming ◽  
Igor Soric ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavin Vasavada ◽  
Hardik Patel

AbstractAim of StudyAim of this meta-analysis was to compare diagnostic accuracy of C reactive Protein and Procalcitonin between postoperative day 3 to 5 in predicting infectious complications post pancreatic surgery.MethodsSystemic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) as a predictor for detecting infectious complications between postoperative days (POD) 3 to 5 following pancreatic surgery. A meta-analysis was performed using random effect model and pooled predictive parameters. Geometric means were calculated for PCT cut offs. The work has been reported in line with PRISMA guidelines.ResultsAfter applying inclusion and exclusion criteria 15 studies consisting of 2212 patients were included in the final analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, Area under curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)for day 3 C-reactive protein was respectively 62%,67% 0.772 and 6.54. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, Area under curve and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)for day 3 procalcitonin was respectively 74%,79%,0.8453 and 11.03. Sensitivity, specificity, Area under curve, and Diagnostic odds ratio for day 4 C-reactive protein was respectively 60%,68%, 0.8022 and 11.90. Pooled Sensitivity, specificity and Diagnostic odds ratio of post-operative day 5 procalcitonin level in predicting infectious complications were respectively 83%,70% and 12.9. Pooled Sensitivity, specificity, AUROC and diagnostic odds ratio were respectively 50%,70%, 0.777 and 10.19.ConclusionPost-operative procalcitonin is better marker to predict post-operative infectious complications after pancreatic surgeries and post-operative day 3 procalcitonin has highest diagnostic accuracy.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0132995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Straatman ◽  
Annelieke M. K. Harmsen ◽  
Miguel A. Cuesta ◽  
Johannes Berkhof ◽  
Elise P. Jansma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document