scholarly journals The efficacy of vitamin B6 as an adjunctive therapy to lithium in improving the symptoms of acute mania in patients with bipolar disorder, type 1; a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahim Badrfam ◽  
Seyed‐Ali Mostafavi ◽  
Ali Khaleghi ◽  
Shahin Akhondzadeh ◽  
Atefeh Zandifar ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Berk ◽  
Seetal Dodd ◽  
Olivia M Dean ◽  
Kristy Kohlmann ◽  
Lesley Berk ◽  
...  

Berk M, Dodd S, Dean OM, Kohlmann K, Berk L, Malhi GS. The validity and internal structure of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale: data from a clinical trial of N-acetylcysteine as adjunctive therapy in bipolar disorder.Background:The phenomenology of unipolar and bipolar disorders differ in a number of ways, such as the presence of mixed states and atypical features. Conventional depression rating instruments are designed to capture the characteristics of unipolar depression and have limitations in capturing the breadth of bipolar disorder.MethodThe Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS) was administered together with the Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) in a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial of N-acetyl cysteine for bipolar disorder (N = 75).Results:A factor analysis showed a two-factor solution: depression and mixed symptom clusters. The BDRS has strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.917), the depression cluster showed robust correlation with the MADRS (r = 0.865) and the mixed subscale correlated with the YMRS (r = 0.750).Conclusion:The BDRS has good internal validity and inter-rater reliability and is sensitive to change in the context of a clinical trial.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Bernardo ◽  
Seetal Dodd ◽  
Clarissa S. Gama ◽  
David L Copolov ◽  
Olivia Dean ◽  
...  

Objective:To evaluate the effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on substance use in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of NAC in bipolar disorder. It is hypothesised that NAC will be superior to placebo for reducing scores on the Clinical Global Impressions scale for Substance Use (CGI-SU).Methods:Participants were randomised to a 6-months of treatment with 2 g/day NAC (n = 38) or placebo (n = 37). Substance use was assessed at baseline using a Habits instrument. Change in substance use was assessed at regular study visits using the CGI-SU.Results:Among the 75 participants 78.7% drank alcohol (any frequency), 45.3% smoked tobacco and 92% consumed caffeine. Other substances were used by fewer than six participants. Caffeine use was significantly lower for NAC-treated participants compared to placebo at week 2 of treatment but not at other study visits.Conclusions:NAC appeared to have little effect on the participants who were using substances. A larger study on a substance-using population will be necessary to determine if NAC may be a useful treatment for substance use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document