Three‐dimensional volumetric measurement of the aortic root compared to standard two‐dimensional measurements using cardiac computed tomography

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masataka Suzuki ◽  
Shumpei Mori ◽  
Yu Izawa ◽  
Shinsuke Shimoyama ◽  
Yu Takahashi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Dave R Shukla ◽  
Richard J McLaughlin ◽  
Julia Lee ◽  
Ngoc Tram V Nguyen ◽  
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo

Background Preoperative planning software has been developed to measure glenoid version, glenoid inclination, and humeral head subluxation on computed tomography (CT) for shoulder arthroplasty. However, most studies analyzing the effect of glenoid positioning on outcome were done prior to the introduction of planning software. Thus, measurements obtained from the software can only be extrapolated to predict failure provided they are similar to classic measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements obtained using classic manual measuring techniques and measurements generated from automated image analysis software. Methods Ninety-five two-dimensional computed tomography scans of shoulders with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were measured for version according to Friedman method, inclination according to Maurer method, and subluxation according to Walch method. DICOM files were loaded into an image analysis software (Blueprint, Wright Medical) and the output was compared with values obtained manually using a paired sample t-test. Results Average manual measurements included 13.8° version, 13.2° inclination, and 56.2% subluxation. Average image analysis software values included 17.4° version (3.5° difference, p < 0.0001), 9.2° inclination (3.9° difference, p < 0.001), and 74.2% for subluxation (18% difference, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Glenoid version and inclination values from the software and manual measurement on two-dimensional computed tomography were relatively similar, within approximately 4°. However, subluxation measurements differed by approximately 20%.


2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582110002
Author(s):  
Lorenz Berger ◽  
Aziz Gulamhusein ◽  
Eoin Hyde ◽  
Matt Gibb ◽  
Teele Kuusk ◽  
...  

Objective: Surgical planning for robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is widely performed using two-dimensional computed tomography images. It is unclear to what extent two-dimensional images fully simulate surgical anatomy and case complexity. To overcome these limitations, software has been developed to reconstruct three-dimensional models from computed tomography data. We present the results of a feasibility study, to explore the role and practicality of virtual three-dimensional modelling (by Innersight Labs) in the context of surgical utility for preoperative and intraoperative use, as well as improving patient involvement. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on patients undergoing robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy at our high volume kidney cancer centre. Approval from a research ethics committee was obtained. Patient demographics and tumour characteristics were collected. Surgical outcome measures were recorded. The value of the three-dimensional model to the surgeon and patient was assessed using a survey. The prospective cohort was compared against a retrospective cohort and cases were individually matched using RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar lines) scores. Results: This study included 22 patients. Three-dimensional modelling was found to be safe for this prospective cohort and resulted in good surgical outcome measures. The mean (standard deviation) console time was 158.6 (35) min and warm ischaemia time was 17.3 (6.3) min. The median (interquartile range) estimated blood loss was 125 (50–237.5) ml. Two procedures were converted to radical nephrectomy due to the risk of positive margins during resection. The median (interquartile range) length of stay was 2 (2–3) days. No postoperative complications were noted and all patients had negative surgical margins. Patients reported improved understanding of their procedure using the three-dimensional model. Conclusion: This study shows the potential benefit of three-dimensional modelling technology with positive uptake from surgeons and patients. Benefits are improved perception of vascular anatomy and resection approach, and procedure understanding by patients. A randomised controlled trial is needed to evaluate the technology further. Level of evidence: 2b


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Alexandru Dorobanțiu ◽  
Valentin Ogrean ◽  
Remus Brad

The mesh-type coronary model, obtained from three-dimensional reconstruction using the sequence of images produced by computed tomography (CT), can be used to obtain useful diagnostic information, such as extracting the projection of the lumen (planar development along an artery). In this paper, we have focused on automated coronary centerline extraction from cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) proposing a 3D version of U-Net architecture, trained with a novel loss function and with augmented patches. We have obtained promising results for accuracy (between 90–95%) and overlap (between 90–94%) with various network training configurations on the data from the Rotterdam Coronary Artery Centerline Extraction benchmark. We have also demonstrated the ability of the proposed network to learn despite the huge class imbalance and sparse annotation present in the training data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. S80
Author(s):  
Moeko Suzuki ◽  
Teruyoshi Uetani ◽  
Jun Aono ◽  
Takayuki Nagai ◽  
Kazuhisa Nishimura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document