scholarly journals Automated three-dimensional measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Dave R Shukla ◽  
Richard J McLaughlin ◽  
Julia Lee ◽  
Ngoc Tram V Nguyen ◽  
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Automated Image Analysis ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Analysis Software ◽  
Glenoid Version ◽  
Image Analysis Software ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Dimensional Measurements

Background Preoperative planning software has been developed to measure glenoid version, glenoid inclination, and humeral head subluxation on computed tomography (CT) for shoulder arthroplasty. However, most studies analyzing the effect of glenoid positioning on outcome were done prior to the introduction of planning software. Thus, measurements obtained from the software can only be extrapolated to predict failure provided they are similar to classic measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements obtained using classic manual measuring techniques and measurements generated from automated image analysis software. Methods Ninety-five two-dimensional computed tomography scans of shoulders with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were measured for version according to Friedman method, inclination according to Maurer method, and subluxation according to Walch method. DICOM files were loaded into an image analysis software (Blueprint, Wright Medical) and the output was compared with values obtained manually using a paired sample t-test. Results Average manual measurements included 13.8° version, 13.2° inclination, and 56.2% subluxation. Average image analysis software values included 17.4° version (3.5° difference, p < 0.0001), 9.2° inclination (3.9° difference, p < 0.001), and 74.2% for subluxation (18% difference, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Glenoid version and inclination values from the software and manual measurement on two-dimensional computed tomography were relatively similar, within approximately 4°. However, subluxation measurements differed by approximately 20%.

scholarly journals Difference in glenoid retroversion between two-dimensional axial computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed images

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-79
Author(s):  
Hyungsuk Kim ◽  
Chang Hyun Yoo ◽  
Soo Bin Park ◽  
Hyun Seok Song
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Body Axis ◽  
Reconstructed Image ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Glenoid Version ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scapular Body

Background: The glenoid version of the shoulder joint correlates with the stability of the glenohumeral joint and the clinical results of total shoulder arthroplasty. We sought to analyze and compare the glenoid version measured by traditional axial two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed images at different levels.Methods: A total of 30 cases, including 15 male and 15 female patients, who underwent 3D shoulder CT imaging was randomly selected and matched by sex consecutively at one hospital. The angular difference between the scapular body axis and 2D CT slice axis was measured. The glenoid version was assessed at three levels (midpoint, upper one-third, and center of the lower circle of the glenoid) using Friedman’s method in the axial plane with 2D CT images and at the same level of three different transverse planes using a 3D reconstructed image. Results: The mean difference between the scapular body axis on the 3D reconstructed image and the 2D CT slice axis was 38.4°. At the level of the midpoint of the glenoid, the measurements were 1.7° ± 4.9° on the 2D CT images and −1.8° ± 4.1° in the 3D reconstructed image. At the level of the center of the lower circle, the measurements were 2.7° ± 5.2° on the 2D CT images and −0.5° ± 4.8° in the 3D reconstructed image. A statistically significant difference was found between the 2D CT and 3D reconstructed images at all three levels. Conclusions: The glenoid version is measured differently between axial 2D CT and 3D reconstructed images at three levels. Use of 3D reconstructed imaging can provide a more accurate glenoid version profile relative to 2D CT. The glenoid version is measured differently at different levels.

scholarly journals Machine Learning Takes Laboratory Automation to the Next Level

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley A. Ford ◽  
Erin McElvania
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Image Analysis ◽  
Clinical Microbiology ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Automated Image Analysis ◽  
Laboratory Automation ◽  
Analysis Software ◽  
Image Analysis Software ◽  
Specimen Type ◽  
Link Type

ABSTRACT Clinical microbiology laboratories face challenges with workload and understaffing that other clinical laboratory sections have addressed with automation. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, M. L. Faron, B. W. Buchan, R. F. Relich, J. Clark, and N. A. Ledeboer (J Clin Microbiol 58:e01683-19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01683-19) evaluate the performance of automated image analysis software to screen urine cultures for further workup according to their total number of CFU. Urine cultures are the highest volume specimen type for most laboratories, so this software has the potential for tremendous gains in laboratory efficiency and quality due to the consistency of colony quantification.

Liver steatosis assessment: Correlations among pathology, radiology, clinical data and automated image analysis software

2013 ◽  
Vol 209 (6) ◽  
pp. 371-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Lee ◽  
Pelin Bagci ◽  
Jun Kong ◽  
Miriam B. Vos ◽  
Puneet Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Liver Steatosis ◽  
Automated Image Analysis ◽  
Analysis Software ◽  
Image Analysis Software
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document