scholarly journals Palliative resection or radiation of primary tumor prolonged survival for metastatic esophageal cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (17) ◽  
pp. 7253-7264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Xu ◽  
Donghui Lu ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Guoping Sun
2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 3201-3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Nishigori ◽  
Masaaki Ito ◽  
Yuji Nishizawa ◽  
Atsushi Kohyama ◽  
Takamaru Koda ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 552-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieven P Depypere ◽  
Johnny Moons ◽  
Toni E Lerut ◽  
Willy Coosemans ◽  
Hans Van Veer ◽  
...  

Background Despite integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography screening before and after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, unexpected metastatic disease is still found in some patients during surgery. Should then esophagectomy be aborted or is there a place for palliative resection? Methods Between 2002 and 2015, 681 patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer were sheduled for neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent esophagectomy. In 552 patients, a potentially curative esophagectomy was performed. In 12 patients, unexpected disease was discovered during surgery but esophagectomy was performed with synchronous resection of metastases; 10 of them had oligometastatic disease (≤4 single-organ metastases). Esophagectomy was not performed in 117 patients (because of disease progression in 50); 14 were also single-organ oligometastatic. Data of 10 single-organ oligometastatic patients who underwent esophageal resection (group 1) were compared those of 10 non-resected but treated counterparts (group 2) and with 228 patients who underwent potentially curative esophagectomy with persistent pathological lymph nodes (group 3). Results Five oligometastatic esophagectomy patients had lung metastases: 1 peritoneal, 2 adrenal, 1 pleural, and 1 pancreatic. Two oligometastatic non-resected patients had lung, 5 liver, and 3 brain metastases. Median overall survival was 21.4, 12.1, and 20.2 months in the respective groups (group 1 vs. group 2  p = 0.042; group 2 vs. group 3  p = 0.002; group 1 vs. group 3  p = 0.88). Conclusions Survival is longer in patients undergoing palliative esophagectomy with unexpected single-organ oligometastatic disease and comparable to survival in patients with persistent pathological lymph nodes. Palliative resection in these patients seems to be justified.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Nishikawa ◽  
Munenori Takaoka ◽  
Toshiaki Ohara ◽  
Yasuko Tomono ◽  
Huifang Hao ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroto Muroi ◽  
Masanobu Nakajima ◽  
Hitoshi Satomura ◽  
Masakazu Takahashi ◽  
Yasushi Domeki ◽  
...  

Abstract A 53-year-old man with multiple liver metastasis of esophageal cancer underwent four courses of chemotherapy. After four courses of chemotherapy, positron emission tomography showed progressive disease. Because it was difficult to control the cancer only by chemotherapy, we performed proton beam therapy (PBT) combined with chemotherapy. The irradiated parts were the primary tumor, liver metastases (S2/S4/S6), and mediastinal lymph nodes. The primary tumor including the mediastinal lymph nodes and the S2/S4/S6 metastases received proton beam irradiation at a total dose of 68.2 Gy in 31 fractions and 66.0 Gy in 30 fractions, respectively, according to tumor location. This resulted in a complete response as shown by positron emission tomography. In our experience, PBT exerted a curative effect on liver metastases of esophageal cancer. It is thought that PBT may be effective in the treatment of esophageal cancer. This is the first report about PBT for liver metastases of esophageal cancer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Takeo Hara ◽  
Tomoki Makino ◽  
Makoto Yamasaki ◽  
Koji Tanaka ◽  
Yasuyuki Miyazaki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), a standard treatment for locally-advanced esophageal cancer, often achieves significant antitumor effect as clinically or microscopically confirmed. However, how chemotherapy histologically impacts upon normal tissues, in particular lymphatic vessels, adjacent to a tumor remains unclear. Methods A total of 137 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy with (NAC group n = 62)/without (nonNAC group n = 75) NAC for thoracic esophageal cancer in our department from 2004 to 2012 were analyzed. The number of lymphatic vessels (NLV) adjacent to primary tumor (within 1000μm from the edge of tumor) in lamina propria mucosae layer was assessed by immunostaining of D2–40 and its association with clinico-pathological parameters was analyzed. Results The NLV was significantly lower in the NAC group as compared with the nonNAC group (NAC vs nonNAC; 19.1 ± 9.0 vs 22.8 ± 8.6, P = 0.014). In the nonNAC group, when classified into two (high vs low NLV) groups by using the cutoff value of the median NLV in nonNAC group, NLV did not correlated with any clinico-pathological factors including age, gender, tumor location, pT, pN, pM, ly, v, and overall survival. On the other hand, in the NAC group, high NLV (classified by the same cutoff value as noted above) was significantly associated with good histological response (grade1b-2) (high vs low NLV; 52 vs 26%, P = 0.026) and less development of lymph node recurrence (16 vs 40%, P = 0.029) but not with other parameters including age, gender, tumor location, pT, pN, pM, ly, and v. Notably, the high NLV group showed the more favorable 5-year overall survival compared to the low NLV group (61 vs 49%, P = 0.0041). Multivariate analysis of overall survival further identified low NLV (HR = 3.68, 95%CI 1.54–10.83, P = 0.0005) to be one of independent prognostic factors along with pT(HR = 2.87, 95%CI 1.37–6.35, P = 0.0050) and pN(HR = 4.04, 95%CI 1.53–13.89, P = 0.0034) in the NAC group. Conclusion NAC might decrease the number of lymphatic vessels adjacent to primary tumor in resected specimen, and this number was associated with tumor response to NAC and long-term outcome in patients who underwent NAC plus surgery. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document