PS02.080: CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NUMBER OF PERITUMORAL LYMPHATIC VESSELS AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Takeo Hara ◽  
Tomoki Makino ◽  
Makoto Yamasaki ◽  
Koji Tanaka ◽  
Yasuyuki Miyazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Lymphatic Vessels ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Resected Specimen ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Cutoff Value

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), a standard treatment for locally-advanced esophageal cancer, often achieves significant antitumor effect as clinically or microscopically confirmed. However, how chemotherapy histologically impacts upon normal tissues, in particular lymphatic vessels, adjacent to a tumor remains unclear. Methods A total of 137 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy with (NAC group n = 62)/without (nonNAC group n = 75) NAC for thoracic esophageal cancer in our department from 2004 to 2012 were analyzed. The number of lymphatic vessels (NLV) adjacent to primary tumor (within 1000μm from the edge of tumor) in lamina propria mucosae layer was assessed by immunostaining of D2–40 and its association with clinico-pathological parameters was analyzed. Results The NLV was significantly lower in the NAC group as compared with the nonNAC group (NAC vs nonNAC; 19.1 ± 9.0 vs 22.8 ± 8.6, P = 0.014). In the nonNAC group, when classified into two (high vs low NLV) groups by using the cutoff value of the median NLV in nonNAC group, NLV did not correlated with any clinico-pathological factors including age, gender, tumor location, pT, pN, pM, ly, v, and overall survival. On the other hand, in the NAC group, high NLV (classified by the same cutoff value as noted above) was significantly associated with good histological response (grade1b-2) (high vs low NLV; 52 vs 26%, P = 0.026) and less development of lymph node recurrence (16 vs 40%, P = 0.029) but not with other parameters including age, gender, tumor location, pT, pN, pM, ly, and v. Notably, the high NLV group showed the more favorable 5-year overall survival compared to the low NLV group (61 vs 49%, P = 0.0041). Multivariate analysis of overall survival further identified low NLV (HR = 3.68, 95%CI 1.54–10.83, P = 0.0005) to be one of independent prognostic factors along with pT(HR = 2.87, 95%CI 1.37–6.35, P = 0.0050) and pN(HR = 4.04, 95%CI 1.53–13.89, P = 0.0034) in the NAC group. Conclusion NAC might decrease the number of lymphatic vessels adjacent to primary tumor in resected specimen, and this number was associated with tumor response to NAC and long-term outcome in patients who underwent NAC plus surgery. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

RA02.08: SALVAGE LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR 14 PATIENTS OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AFTER DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHRAPY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Kazuki Odagiri ◽  
Makoto Yamasaki ◽  
Koji Tanaka ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyazaki ◽  
Tomoki Makino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Salvage Lymphadenectomy

Abstract Background Salvage Lymphadenectomy is regarded as the only curative surgery to residual or recurrence lymph nodes of esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, salvage lymphadenectomy is not described in the Japanese esophageal cancer treatment guideline because of little evidences for the safety and efficacy. Methods From January 2011 to December 2015, we performed 14 salvage lymphadenectomies to residual or recurrence LN of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) in Osaka University. We assessed postoperative complications and long-term outcome. Results Average age was 64 year-olds (SD: 5.2). Male: Female = 11: 3. cStage I: II-IV = 7: 7. Surgery to cervical LN were 11 patients and abdominal LN were 3 patients. Surgery to residual LN (res-LN) were 9 patients and recurrence LN (rec-LN) were 5 patients. rec-LN patient's median time to recurrence after dCRT was 14.3 months (10.2–29.3). 4 patients were performed lymphadenectomy resecting with adjacent organs, 3 patients were bronchus (trachea? ) and 1 patient was right subclavian artery. 4 patients had postoperative complication, two were pneumonia, one was pulmonary thrombosis and one was lymphorrhea, but there was no serious case (Clavien-Dindo Grade II or less). We didn’t have hospital death. Six of 14 patients had recurrence and died after salvage lymphadenectomy. Recurrence sites were 2 mediastinal lymph nodes and liver, lung, loco-regional and peritoneal. But no patients had recurrence of main tumor. 5-year overall survival rate was 51.1%. Median survival time in 9 patients, surgery to res-LN, was 18.9 months (10.4–132 months) and 5 patients, surgery to rec-LN, was 4.9 months (1.4–26.6 months). Surgery to res-LN patients were longer than rec-LN patients in overall survival after salvage lymphadenectomy (P = 0.395). There was no difference due to the difference in recurrence site of the cancer in overall survival after salvage lymphadenectomy. Conclusion Our data show salvage lymphadenectomy safety and effectiveness after dCRT. Salvage lymphadenectomy may extend the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer after dCRT. Thus, salvage lymphadenectomy may be one of the treatment options for the patients with residual or recurrent, especially the former, lymph node after definitive CRT, although it is necessary to evaluate in many cases. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PS02.184: PROFILING RETURN TO INTENDED ONCOLOGIC THERAPY (RIOT) IN LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING ESOPHAGECTOMIES FOLLOWED BY POSTOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 174-174
Author(s):  
Wei Dai ◽  
Qiuling Shi ◽  
Yongtao Han ◽  
Lin Peng
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Oncologic Therapy

Abstract Background As a novel metric to evaluate the quality of oncosurgical therapy, such as minimal invasive surgery, Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy (RIOT) has not been applied in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). This study aims to profile RIOT in locally advanced EC patients and to quantify its relationship with overall survival. Methods We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive locally advanced EC (T3–4 and/or N1–3) patients who received esophagectomies followed by postoperative chemotherapy (PC) from April 2015 to August 2017. RIOT included whether the patient did or did not undergo intended PC and the time between surgery and the start of PC. Overall survival at each RIOT group was compared via log-rank test. Cox regression models were used to estimate the prognostic value of RIOT. Results Among 658 locally advanced EC patients (547 males and 111 females) with complete PC data, 433 received minimal invasive esophagectomies (MIE) and 225 received open esophagectomies (OE). The RIOT rates were 58.0% for MIE and 54.2% for OE (P = 0.358). The 1-year overall survival rate of patients receiving PC was higher than that of patients not receiving PC (88.2% vs 76.4%; P = 0.005). After adjustment of age, gender, surgery type and postoperative length of stay, patients with PC showed significantly better OS than those without PC (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.87; P = 0.007). Total 253 patients (MIE 168, OE 85) presented verified dates of starting PC. Median RIOT time was 42 days (min-max, 13–162) for MIE and 43 days (16–169) for OE (P = 0.855). Among those 253 patients, 179 (70.8%) started RIOT within 8 weeks. After 8 weeks, every one week delay of RIOT related to a 17% increase on the risk of death (P = 0.014). Conclusion Using a real world data, our study provided baseline profiles of RIOT in locally advanced EC patients who received esophagectomies and PC. Compared to OE, MIE did not show a significant advantage in RIOT rates and RIOT time. In spite of the short follow-up, successful RIOT is related to better OS. Prospective studies with longer follow-up are required for further application of RIOT in the evaluation of oncosurgical therapy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PS01.184: ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGICAL TREATMENT IN BRAZILIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE: 25 YEARS EXPERIENCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Marco Antonio Guimaraes Filho ◽  
Flávio Sabino ◽  
Daniel Fernandes ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Pinto ◽  
Luis Felipe Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
National Cancer Institute ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Surgical Mortality ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Hospitalization Time

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer is the 8th most common cancer in the world. It is an lethal disease, responsible for almost 400.000 deaths by year. Surgical resection is considered the gold standard in esophageal cancer treatment, with a global 15–40% cure rate. In this study, the results of esophageal cancer surgical treatment at Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Abdominal-pelvic Surgical Section, is analyzed. Methods The medical records of 215 patients with esophageal cancer, treated with surgical resection (esophagectomy), between January 1999 and December 2015, were retrospectively studied. The endpoints analyzed in the study were: hospitalization time, operative complications and mortality, and overall survival. Results Esophageal cancer was predominant in male patients; median age was 58 years (27–78). Primary tumor location varied between 7,5 - 41 cm (median 32cm) and tumor extension 1 - 16cm (median 5cm). Median surgical time was 330 minutes (120–720); transhiatal esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction was the most used surgical approach. Tumors histopathological types were equaly distributed. ICU (Intensive Care Unit) stay median time was 5 days (1–87) and median hospitalization time was 15 days (5–166). Most common surgical complications were anastomotic leakage (25,5%) and pneumonia (20%), with a surgical morbidity rate of 61,8%. Surgical mortality rate was 12%, with 61% of these cases occuring in the 30 days after surgery. Median 2-year overall survival was 44,3 months. Conclusion Besides the high surgical morbidity, esophagectomy for esophageal cancer remains the standard treatment for patients with ressectable tumors and without clinical contraindications for surgery. Reduction of surgical mortality depends on rigorous patients selection, surgical team expertise and adequate perioperative and postoperative care. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PS02.138: SALVAGE ESOPHAGECTOMY: SINGLE ONCOLOGICAL CENTER EXPERIENCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 159-160
Author(s):  
Flávio Sabino ◽  
Marco Guimaraes ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Pinto ◽  
Daniel Fernandes ◽  
Luis Felipe Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Salvage Esophagectomy ◽  
Thoracic Approach ◽  
Clinical Conditions ◽  
Local Advanced

Abstract Background Surgical resection is considering the gold standard in esophageal cancer treatment, with 15–40% cure global rates. Radical exclusive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used in patients with local advanced esophageal cancer or without clinical conditions for esophagectomy, with a 5-year overall survival up to 30%. However, locoregional control is poor with a 40–60% recurrence rate and salvage esophagectomy maybe an option for these patients. Methods Our objective is to report the experience of a single high volume oncological institution with salvage esophagectomy. Retrospective analysis of 28 patients medical records, with esophageal cancer, submitted to Salvage Esophagectomy in Brazilian NCI after radical exclusive CRT or RT between January 1990 and December 2015. Results Median age was 56 years and most are male (78,5%). Esophageal middle third was the tumor principal location (50%) and histological type was squamous cell carcinoma (82%). Thoracic approach for esophagectomy was the principal surgical technique, and gastric tube the most used conduit for reconstruction (78,5%). Surgery was R0 in 83% of the cases, with a surgical morbidity of 64%. Median hospital time was 15 days (8–58) and surgical mortality 14% (4 patients), with 7% in the first 30 days. Median overall survival was 22,3 months. Conclusion Our results are in line with published data in the literature. Besides surgical morbidity and mortality, Salvage Esophagectomy remains de only chance of cure for patients with locoregional recurrence after radical exclusive CRT. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Phase II cisplatin, irinotecan, cetuximab and concurrent radiation therapy followed by surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4064-4064 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. Enzinger ◽  
T. Yock ◽  
W. Suh ◽  
P. Fidias ◽  
H. Mamon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Advanced Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

4064 Background: Weekly irinotecan, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy is a well-tolerated, active regimen in locally advanced esophageal cancer. (Ilson. JCO 2003) Cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, is a potent radiation sensitizer in head and neck cancer. (Bonner. Proc ASCO 2004) Methods: In this phase II trial, patients (pts) with T2–4N0–1M0–1A esophageal adenocarcinoma (A) or squamous cell carcinoma (S) receive 5040 cGy/28 fractions of radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent weekly cisplatin 30mg/m2 plus irinotecan 65 mg/m2 on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5, followed by surgery 4–8 weeks after completion of RT. Additionally, pts receive weekly infusions of cetuximab 250 mg during RT, up to one week before surgery, and for 6 months following surgery. Results: Seventeen pts have been entered: male: female = 14:3, median age 54, ECOG PS 0:1 = 6:11, A:S = 17:0, stage IIA:IIB:III:IVA = 6:1:8:2, tumor location-esophagus-mid:lower:gastroesophageal junction = 1:4:12, >10% weight loss-yes:no = 8:9. Of 17 pts entered, 15 pts have proceeded to surgery, 1 pt died from Aspergillus infection resulting in respiratory failure and sepsis, and 1 pt is pending surgery. Of the 15 pts who underwent surgery, 2 (13%) had a complete pathologic response; pathologic stage for other pts: 0 = 1, I = 3, IIA = 3, IIB = 1, III = 4, IV = 1. Grade III/IV toxicity (17 pts) was: diarrhea 9 pts, neutropenia 9 pts, febrile neutropenia 5 pts, anorexia 5 pts, vomiting 4 pts, fatigue 3 pts, mucositis 1 pt. Chemotherapy dose attenuation was required for diarrhea in 5 pts, for neutropenia in 4 pts, and for folliculitis in 1 pt. One patient was removed from study during week 6 for prolonged diarrhea/ dehydration. Due to the 2-step design of the trial, accrual is on hold pending a 3rd required pathologic CR in the first 17 patients. Conclusions: Compared to other trials of irinotecan, cisplatin, radiation therapy, and surgery in similar groups of esophageal cancer patients, early results for this combination with cetuximab suggest a lower complete response rate and higher overall toxicity. Additional data will be available at ASCO. Supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and total mesenteric excision for locally advanced rectal cancer with resectable metastases.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 526-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Hajj ◽  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
Leonard Saltz ◽  
Neil Howard Segal ◽  
Diane Lauren Reidy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

526 Background: Optimal management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and synchronous, resectable metastases remains controversial and treatment decisions benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. To better characterize the role of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery, we evaluated patterns of distal progression and overall survival in this subset of patients. Methods: We reviewed records of 25 LARC patients with synchronous resectable metastases treated with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by 5-fluorouracil-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) at our institution between December 2006 and December 2010. Radiation was delivered using a standardized three-field technique or IMRT. The incidence and sites of failure were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the completion of CRT using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of the 25 patients who received ICT followed by CRT, 21 (84%) underwent total mesorectal excision and metastectomy. Eleven patients (44%) had liver metastases. The median ICT duration was 2.4 months. Twenty patients (80%) received a FOLFOX-based ICT regimen and 5 patients (20%) received irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Two patients had unresectable disease, one was medically inoperable, and surgery was aborted due to intra-operative complications in one patient. Eighteen of the 21 were NED after surgery and metastatectomy (86%) with 24% pathologic complete response rate in the primary tumor; 10 (56%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. None of the patients recurred locally. Six of the 18 (33%) progressed distally, four of whom had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Four distal recurrences were in the lungs. With a median follow-up of 29.6 months, the 3-year OS was 50.4%. Median OS and PFS were 25.1 months and 13.5 months, respectively. Conclusions: ICT prior to CRT is associated with acceptable toxicity, substantial primary tumor regression, and promising clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk LARC with synchronous, resectable metastatic disease.

Distribution of FDG-avid nodes in esophageal cancer: Implications for radiotherapy target delineation.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 151-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Garcia ◽  
Karyn A. Goodman ◽  
Lajhem Cambridge ◽  
Mark Dunphy ◽  
Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Volume Data ◽  
Target Delineation ◽  
Esophageal Tumors ◽  
Occult Disease ◽  
Target Volumes ◽  
Individualized Approach ◽  
Pre Treatment

151 Background: Clinical target volumes (CTV) for radiation therapy (RT) in esophageal cancer (EC) are based on standard expansions of the primary tumor volume. Data is needed to better define the regions at highest risk for occult disease, based on histology and location of the primary tumor. We therefore reviewed PET scans in EC patients to characterize the frequency and location of FDG-avid lymph node metastases (LNM). Methods: We identified 474 EC patients with reviewable pre-treatment PET-CT scans who received RT. Tumors were classified by histology and location: upper esophageal (above carina, 15%), or lower/GE junction (85%). Locations of suspicious LNM were classified using standard radiographic nodal atlases, and distances from primary tumor to paraesophageal LNM were also measured. Results: FDG-avid LNM were identified and characterized in 204 patients. The most common LNM in upper EC were supraclavicular (1), retrotracheal (3P) and paratracheal (4). The most common LNM in lower EC were paraesophageal (8), and those in the gastrohepatic space (abdominal stations 1, 3 and 7). Overall, 55% of paraesophageal LNM were adjacent to the primary tumor. Of upper esophageal tumors with paraesophageal LNM, 87% were adjacent to the tumor and none were >6cm from tumor. However, 57% of lower esophageal tumors with paraesophageal LNM had non-adjacent paraesophageal nodes, half of which were >5cm from the tumor. Conclusions: A more data-driven and individualized approach to CTV delineation could improve the therapeutic ratio of RT in esophageal cancer. These results can guide CTV delineation by indicating the potential distribution of nodal involvement in esophageal cancer according to tumor location and histology. Because most paraesophageal LNM are adjacent to primary tumor, the necessity for uniformly large, longitudinal CTV expansions along the esophagus is unclear. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document