scholarly journals Return to work following laparoscopic‐assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: Findings from AlaCaRT—Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Kin Law ◽  
Kate Brewer ◽  
Chris Brown ◽  
Kate Wilson ◽  
Lisa Bailey ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Celia R. Keane ◽  
Greg O’Grady ◽  
Ian P. Bissett ◽  
Julian Hayes ◽  
Mike Hulme-Moir ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 314 (13) ◽  
pp. 1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. L. Stevenson ◽  
Michael J. Solomon ◽  
John W. Lumley ◽  
Peter Hewett ◽  
Andrew D. Clouston ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 314 (13) ◽  
pp. 1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Fleshman ◽  
Megan Branda ◽  
Daniel J. Sargent ◽  
Anne Marie Boller ◽  
Virgilio George ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 269 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. L. Stevenson ◽  
Michael J. Solomon ◽  
Christopher S. B. Brown ◽  
John W. Lumley ◽  
Peter Hewett ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W.T. Toh ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Seon-Hahn Kim

AbstractThere has been a rapid rise in the number of robotic colorectal procedures worldwide since the da Vinci Surgical System robotic technology was approved for surgical procedures in the year 2000. Several recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown a significant difference in outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, these results from pooled data have not been supported by the initial results reported from the Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic assisted resection for rectal cancer trial. In this article, we examine the current evidence for robotic colorectal surgery, assess its features and functionality, evaluate its learning curve and provide our perspective on its future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document