How do direct oral anticoagulants compare with warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events in adults with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Burch ◽  
Juliana Ester Martin-Lopez
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1463-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harpreet S. Bhatia ◽  
Joseph Bailey ◽  
Ozan Unlu ◽  
Katherine Hoffman ◽  
Robert J. Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber Makani ◽  
Samir Saba ◽  
Sandeep K. Jain ◽  
Aditya Bhonsale ◽  
Michael S. Sharbaugh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Z. D. Kobalava ◽  
A. A. Shavarov ◽  
M. V. Vatsik-Gorodetskaya

Atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction often coexist, each disorder may predispose to the other and contribute to worsening prognosis. Both atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease are associated with increased risk of stroke and thromboembolic complications. Oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention is therefore recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation and decreased renal function. Each direct oral anticoagulant has unique pharmacologic properties of which clinician should be aware to optimally manage patients. The doses of direct oral anticoagulants require adjustment for renal function. There is debate regarding which equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equation vs. the Cockcroft-Gault equation, should be used to estimate glomerular filtration rate in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Our review tries to find arguments for benefit of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with renal dysfunction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3S) ◽  
pp. 4676
Author(s):  
N. Sh. Zagidullin ◽  
P. A. Davtyan

Due to the population aging and the accumulation of concomitant diseases, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) as the most common arrhythmia is increasing. On the other hand, 14% of the population has chronic kidney disease (CKD). These conditions are often combined with each other causing a prothrombogenic effect, which significantly increase the number of unfavorable outcomes such as thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. This is especially true for the last stages of CKD, the so-called end-stage renal disease with a glomerular filtration rate <29 ml/min/1,73 m2. Previously, the vitamin K antagonist warfarin was the central drug for anticoagulant therapy of AF + CKD combination, but in the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants became widely used. This article discusses the evidence base for using each of the anticoagulants in patients with AF+CKD combination compared with warfarin, including depending on the severity of glomerular filtration rate decrease.


Author(s):  
Cynthia A. Jackevicius ◽  
Lingyun Lu ◽  
Zunera Ghaznavi ◽  
Alberta L. Warner

Background: Patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation are an important atrial fibrillation subgroup in which direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have not been adequately studied in real-world settings. Since DOACs rely on renal elimination and renal dysfunction is prevalent in patients with heart failure, their use may increase bleeding risk, negating some of their advantage over warfarin. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Veterans Administration databases of patients with heart failure newly started on warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation from October 2010 to August 2017 (23 635 warfarin, 25 823 DOAC). Outcomes included time to first bleeding, stroke, and death using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Total bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.56–0.68]), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40–0.61]), and death (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.71–0.78]) were lower with DOAC than warfarin, and with apixaban and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban. Moderate/severe chronic kidney disease was common (48.7%); moderate chronic kidney disease was associated with increased bleeding with DOACs but not warfarin. However, death and bleeding remained lower with DOACs than warfarin across all renal function levels and clinical subgroups. A >20% transient/persistent decline in renal function occurred in 53% of DOAC-treated patients at some point during follow-up, would have required dose reduction in 10.5% of patients, and was associated with increased bleeding. Dose adjustments were made more often, and bleeding and death were lower in patients seen by pharmacists or anticoagulation clinics. There were significant between-site variations in DOAC dosing. Conclusions: DOACs overall, apixaban, and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban, were associated with less total bleeding and death than warfarin in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation at all levels of renal function. Renal function decline resulted in increased bleeding in patients with DOACs. DOAC dose adjustment was often indicated, associated with increased bleeding when not adjusted, emphasizing the need for closer monitoring in these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-266
Author(s):  
Kerem Özbek ◽  
Hülya Çiçekçioğlu ◽  
Mustafa Çetin ◽  
Pınar Türker Duyuler

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-267
Author(s):  
Harpreet S. Bhatia ◽  
Joseph Bailey ◽  
Ozan Unlu ◽  
Katherine Hoffman ◽  
Robert J. Kim

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Petrov ◽  
O. V. Shatalova ◽  
A. S. Gerasimenko ◽  
V. S. Gorbatenko

The purpose of this review is to examine the possibilities and prospects for the use of direct oral anticoagulants for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease and more rapid progression of existing renal pathology. The presence of chronic kidney disease in atrial fibrillation on the one hand leads to an increased risk of thromboembolism, and on the other to an increased risk of bleeding when using anticoagulants. The standard for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation, including those with concomitant renal pathology, was considered warfarin for many years. However, modern studies have shown that the use of warfarin may enhance vascular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease, which in turn may lead to an increased risk of ischemic strokes.Analyzing clinical recommendations, randomized studies, meta-analyzes and a systematic review on the use of anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal pathology, revealed the advantage of using direct oral anticoagulants over warfarin at stage 1-3 of chronic kidney disease. Data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants with a more pronounced renal dysfunction and in patients on dialysis is limited due to the lack of a sufficient number of large randomized studies. Due to the presence of renal clearance in all oral anticoagulants, their pharmacokinetics changes to some extent with a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate, which requires dose adjustment of drugs depending on creatinine clearance. Therefore, the use of anticoagulants for the prevention of thromboembolic complications during atrial fibrillation requires special attention in patients with chronic kidney disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document