scholarly journals Impact of yield component alleles from durum wheat on end‐use quality of spring wheat

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittney H. Jones ◽  
Nancy K. Blake ◽  
Hwa‐Young Heo ◽  
Jay R. Kalous ◽  
John M. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Yield Component ◽  
End Use

scholarly journals Seeding Rate Effects on Hybrid Spring Wheat Yield, Yield Components and Quality

Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1240
Author(s):  
Peder K. Schmitz ◽  
Joel K. Ransom
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Yield Components ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Yield Component ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Protein Yield ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
End Use

Agronomic practices, such as planting date, seeding rate, and genotype, commonly influence hard red spring wheat (HRSW, Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) production. Determining the agronomic optimum seeding rate (AOSR) of newly developed hybrids is needed as they respond to seeding rates differently from inbred cultivars. The objectives of this research were to determine the AOSR of new HRSW hybrids, how seeding rate alters their various yield components, and whether hybrids offer increased end-use quality, compared to conventional cultivars. The performance of two cultivars (inbreds) and five hybrids was evaluated in nine North Dakota environments at five seeding rates in 2019−2020. Responses to seeding rate for yield and protein yield differed among the genotypes. The AOSR ranged from 3.60 to 5.19 million seeds ha−1 and 2.22 to 3.89 million seeds ha−1 for yield and protein yield, respectively. The average AOSR for yield for the hybrids was similar to that of conventional cultivars. However, the maximum protein yield of the hybrids was achieved at 0.50 million seeds ha−1 less than that of the cultivars tested. The yield component that explained the greatest proportion of differences in yield as seeding rates varied was kernels spike−1 (r = 0.17 to 0.43). The end-use quality of the hybrids tested was not superior to that of the conventional cultivars, indicating that yield will likely be the determinant of the economic feasibility of any future released hybrids.

Improving hexaploid spring wheat by introgression of alleles for yield component traits from durum wheat

Crop Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 759-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittney H. Jones ◽  
Nancy K. Blake ◽  
Hwa‐Young Heo ◽  
Jay R. Kalous ◽  
John M. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Yield Component ◽  
Component Traits ◽  
Yield Component Traits

Vesper hard red spring wheat

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Thomas ◽  
S. Fox ◽  
B. McCallum ◽  
T. Fetch ◽  
J. Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
High Water ◽  
Head Blight ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Wheat Midge ◽  
End Use ◽  
Sprouting Resistance ◽  
Moderately Resistant ◽  
Wheat Kernels

Thomas, J., Fox, S., McCallum, B., Fetch, T., Gilbert, J., Menzies, J., Wise, I., Smith, M., Gaudet, D., Niziol, D., Humphreys, G. and Brown, D. 2013. Vesper hard red spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 93: 315–321. Vesper is a high-yielding, hard red spring wheat that is adapted to the wheat-growing regions of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. In the Central Bread Wheat Cooperative Registration Trials of 2007, 2008 and 2009, Vesper out-yielded five check cultivars by an average of 12%, and Unity, which was the highest yielding check, by 4.6%. Lodging, height and maturity scores of Vesper were all intermediate (similar to the check mean). Pre-harvest sprouting resistance of Vesper was equivalent to the poorer checks (Katepwa and CDC Teal). Kernels of Vesper were heavier than all five checks and test weight was high (exceeded only by Unity). Vesper was resistant to leaf rust and was moderately resistant to stem rust and Fusarium head blight. Vesper was intermediately resistant to loose smut and was susceptible to common bunt. Spikes of Vesper showed two forms of resistance to wheat midge: antibiotic resistance (no larvae observed in the field) and antixenotic resistance (reduced egg numbers laid by caged ovipositing females). Over 3 yr of testing, end use quality of Vesper was rated as eligible for the Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) market class of wheat. Kernels of Vesper were relatively hard with consequent high water absorption.

Impact of cropping systems on end-use quality of hard red spring wheat

1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.F. McGuire ◽  
G.F. Stallknecht ◽  
R.A. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Cropping Systems ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
End Use

End-Use Quality of Six Hard Red Spring Wheat Cultivars at Different Irrigation Levels

Crop Science ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 631-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary J. Guttieri ◽  
Rashid Ahmad ◽  
Jeffrey C. Stark ◽  
Edward Souza
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
End Use ◽  
Irrigation Levels

End-Use Quality of CIMMYT-Derived Soft-Kernel Durum Wheat Germplasm: I. Grain, Milling, and Soft Wheat Quality

Crop Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 1475-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Boehm ◽  
M. Itria Ibba ◽  
Alecia M. Kiszonas ◽  
Craig F. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Soft Wheat ◽  
Wheat Quality ◽  
Wheat Germplasm ◽  
Grain Milling ◽  
End Use

Improvement in end-use quality of spring wheat varieties grown in different eras

2008 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faqir Muhammad Anjum ◽  
Ijaz Ahmad ◽  
Masood Sadiq Butt ◽  
Muhammad Umair Arshad ◽  
Imran Pasha
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Wheat Varieties ◽  
End Use

End-Use Quality of CIMMYT-Derived Soft-Kernel Durum Wheat Germplasm: II. Dough Strength and Pan Bread Quality

Crop Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 1485-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Boehm ◽  
M. Itria Ibba ◽  
Alecia M. Kiszonas ◽  
Craig F. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Bread Quality ◽  
Dough Strength ◽  
Wheat Germplasm ◽  
Pan Bread ◽  
End Use

End-Use Quality of Hard Red and Hard White Spring Wheat Contaminated with Grain of Contrasting Classes

2002 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra Habernicht ◽  
John M. Martin ◽  
Luther E. Talbert
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
End Use

INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZERS AND BIOPREPARATIONS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SPRING WHEAT GRAIN

2020 ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
A.A. Alferov ◽  
◽  
L.S. Chernova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Wheat Grain
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document