scholarly journals A “happy ending” of mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy associated with hepatosplenomegaly and pulmonary lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 767-769
Author(s):  
Fares Ben Salem ◽  
Wafa Triki ◽  
Asma Belkhir ◽  
Siwar Sbaihi ◽  
Seif Boukriba
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
V. N. Korolyov ◽  
D. V. Gogoleva ◽  
O. A. Gladkov ◽  
A. M. Mikita

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (05) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Baskin ◽  
G. Amzalag ◽  
F. Buchegger ◽  
R. Miralbell ◽  
O. Ratib ◽  
...  

SummaryAim: To assess the frequency and the significance of incidental pulmonary lesions with 18F-fluorocholine (18F-FCH) PET/CT in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Patients, methods: 225 consecutive PCa patients referred for 18F-FCH PET/CT (median age 68 years) were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of lesions in the lungs: 173 referred for restaging and 52 for initial staging regarding their high risk of extra prostatic extension. The final diagnosis was based on histopathological or on clinical and radiological follow-up. Results: 13 patients had 18F-FCH positive pulmonary and 8 patients malignant lesions: 5 patients (38%) had a primary lung cancer (2 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 papillary adenocarcinoma, 1 typical pulmonary carcinoid, 1 bronchioloalveolar carcinoma) and 3 patients (23%) PCa metastases. Benign lesions were found in 5 subjects (38%). SUVmax and maximum diameter were neither significantly different in primary and metastatic tumors nor between malignant and benign lesions. Conclusions: Although our results suggest that incidental uptake in the lungs in PCa patients are nonspecific, their detection may have a significant impact on patient management knowing that more than 60% represent malignant diseas.


Author(s):  
Alexander C. Loney

This book is the first in-depth examination of revenge in the Odyssey. The principal revenge plot of the Odyssey—Odysseus’ surprise return to Ithaca after twenty years away and his vengeance on Penelope’s suitors—is the act for which he is most celebrated. This story forms the backbone of the Odyssey. But is Odysseus’ triumph over the suitors as univocally celebratory as is often assumed? Does the poem contain and even suggest other, darker interpretations of Odysseus’ greatest achievement? This book offers a careful analysis of several other revenge plots in the Odyssey—those of Orestes, Poseidon, Zeus, and the suitors’ relatives. It shows how these revenge stories color one another with allusions (explicit and implicit) that connect them and invite audiences to interpret them in light of one another. These stories—especially Odysseus’ revenge upon the suitors—inevitably turn out to have multiple meanings. One plot of revenge slips into another as the offender in one story becomes a victim to be avenged in the next. As a result, Odysseus turns out to be a much more ambivalent hero than has been commonly accepted. And in the Odyssey’s portrayal, revenge is an unstable foundation for a community. Revenge also ends up being a tenuous narrative structure for an epic poem, as a natural end to cycles of vengeance proves elusive. This book offers a radical new reading of the seemingly happy ending of the poem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document