A Conjunctive Study of Solar Flare 20010402 and Related Solar Proton Events by the Observation of SZ2/XD and ZY1/CBMC

2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 837-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Qian MA ◽  
Huan-Yu WANG ◽  
Cheng-Mo ZhaNG ◽  
Yu-Peng Xu ◽  
Jin-Zhou WANG ◽  
...  





1967 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. F. Smerd

Dodson and Hedeman discovered an unexpected effect in the occurrence of solar proton events as revealed by polarcap absorption (PCA). When the 48 events in Bailey’s Catalog of the Principal PCA Events, 1952-1963 are distributed with the phase of the moon there is a gap of several days near full moon; also, many more events occur when the moon waxes than when it wanes. Dodson and Hedeman did not find similar, apparent departures from random distribution either with a mean solar rotation period of 27.3 days or for solar flare events. They concluded that ‘at the present time it is not clear whether the 29.5 day “effect” is related to the sun or the moon or is only a statistical accident’.



Author(s):  
M. V. Subramanian ◽  
S. Jagadesan ◽  
K. Aruna ◽  
S. Pari ◽  
S. Deivamalar

Estimation has been made for the most powerful solar proton events recorded in the Earth environment during 1976 - 2015. This study has been done in association with other related activities such as Sunspot numbers and Solar flare index, the Earth’s magnetic field variation H constant, Dst index, Ap index and Kp index data from Kyoto data centre and OMNI data centre. We found that proton flux occurred after two days indicate the Dst index, Ap index and Kp index and Earth’s magnetic field H constant variations. This study has been done in association with other related activities such as sunspot numbers, solar flare activities. We found that the proton event occurred within 25 to 29 days after the cyclone was formed in the earth atmosphere. Earth atmospheric climate also changed.



1984 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-594
Author(s):  
A. G. Fenton ◽  
K. B. Fenton ◽  
J. E. Humble

Six solar proton events have been observed by ground level cosmic ray detectors so far during solar cycle 21, a little less than one per year. All of these have been much smaller than the giant events observed in solar cycle 19. As with many other aspects of solar activity, the reason for the differences from cycle to cycle remain unknown.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Vitaly Ishkov ◽  
Yury Logachev ◽  
Galina Bazilevskaya ◽  
Elena Daibog ◽  
...  




1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Smart ◽  
M. A. Shea


1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Lanzerotti ◽  
D. W. Maurer ◽  
H. H. Sauer ◽  
R. D. Zwickl


1969 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. W. Hewitt

Observations of partial reflections from the ionosphere at vertical incidence at 2.66 MHz have been made at Resolute Bay, geographic latitude 74.7 °N, since September 1963. By measuring the amplitudes of the ordinary and extraordinary backscattered waves information is obtained about electron number densities in the lower ionosphere. The results presented in this paper show that the partial reflection technique is more sensitive than most other ground-based experiments for the detection of D-region ionization increases associated with small solar proton events. Results obtained by the partial reflection experiment during the events of 5 February 1965 and 16 July 1966 are presented and compared with VLF and satellite observations.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document