scholarly journals Performance characteristics of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in unselected women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who have undergone universal germline mutation testing

Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (24) ◽  
pp. 3932-3939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Ferguson ◽  
Melyssa Aronson ◽  
Aaron Pollett ◽  
Lua R. Eiriksson ◽  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5508-5508
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Ferguson ◽  
Melyssa Aronson ◽  
Lua R Eiriksson ◽  
Golnessa Mojtahedi ◽  
Aaron Pollett ◽  
...  

5508 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is often the sentinel cancer in women with Lynch Syndrome (LS) however it is often not recognized in this population. A prospective cohort study comparing family history, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and tumour morphology to germline mutation status in MMR genes was performed in unselected women with EC to determine which screening strategy was superior in identifying women with LS. Methods: All women with newly diagnosed EC between July 2010 and June 2011 were asked to participate in the prospective screening protocol for LS which included completing an extended family history questionnaire (eFHQ), tumor assessment for LS-associated morphologic features and IHC as well as germline mutation testing. Results: 119 (n = 182, 65%) consented to the study. The median age was 61 (26-91), 96 (81%) stage I, and 42 (35%) had high risk histology. There were 6 (7.4%, n = 81) women that were germline mutation positive (MLH1 N=3; MSH6 n = 2; MSH2 n =1), representing a mutation positive rate of at least 5% in this cohort (6/119). All 3 MLH1 mutation positive women had low grade histology while mutations in MSH2/6 were exclusively found in women with high risk histology. Two of the six mutation positive women were not identified by family history. Mutation positivity was higher in women under age 50 (23%; 5/22) compared to women > age 50 (1%; 1/97)( (p = 0.0008). LS-morphologic features were found in 58 (59%, n = 98) women. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the LS-associated features in predicting LS mutation status was 100%, 42.6%, 7.9% and 100% compared to IHC which was 100%, 76%, 18% and 100% and eFHQ which was 67%, 84%, 27%, 97%. Conclusions: In this unselected population of women with newly diagnosed EC the germline mutation rate for LS was 2-3 times that has previously been reported. Previously described LS-associated morphologic features were not specific to germline mutation status and family history missed one third of women with LS. IHC was the best strategy to identify women with EC who should undergo germline mutation testing.


2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lua Eiriksson ◽  
Melyssa Aronson ◽  
Blaise Clarke ◽  
Golnessa Mojtahedi ◽  
Christine Massey ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Resnick ◽  
J Michael Straughn ◽  
Floor Backes ◽  
Heather Hampel ◽  
Kellie S. Matthews ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (33) ◽  
pp. 5158-5164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen H. Lu ◽  
John O. Schorge ◽  
Kerry J. Rodabaugh ◽  
Molly S. Daniels ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
...  

Purpose Age younger than 50 years at the time of colon cancer diagnosis is often used as a screening criterion for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 mutations in an unselected cohort of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer at age younger than 50 years. Methods A prospective, multicenter study was performed at three institutions. After written consent was obtained, germline mutation testing by full sequencing and large deletion analysis of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes was performed. Tumor studies included immunohistochemistry of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6; microsatellite instability analysis; and hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. Results Of the 100 women, nine (9%; 95% CI, 4.2 to 16.4) carried a deleterious germline mutation: seven women with mutations in MSH2, one woman with a mutation in MLH1, and one woman with a mutation in MSH6. Two additional women had molecular studies consistent with the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. The mean body mass index (BMI) for the entire cohort was 34.4, which is significantly higher than 29.2, the mean BMI for the mutation carriers. Predictors of finding a germline mutation included having a first-degree relative with a Lynch syndrome–associated cancer, endometrial tumor with loss of MSH2 expression, tumors with high microsatellite instability, and lower BMI. Conclusion In this prospective study of endometrial cancer patients younger than age 50 years, 9% were found to carry germline Lynch syndrome–associated mutations. In addition to young age of onset, family history, BMI, and molecular tumor studies can improve the likelihood of identifying a Lynch syndrome–associated germline mutation in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6.


Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (22) ◽  
pp. 4886-4894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soyoun Rachel Kim ◽  
Alicia Tone ◽  
Raymond H. Kim ◽  
Matthew Cesari ◽  
Blaise A. Clarke ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 98-98
Author(s):  
Minggui Pan ◽  
Elizabeth Hoodfar ◽  
JoAnn Bergoffen ◽  
Regan Fulton ◽  
Laura Hofmeister ◽  
...  

98 Background: Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome has profound impact on the clinical care of patients and their families. Previous guidelines based on family history alone have shown low sensitivity. In our medical center, the detection rate of Lynch syndrome was <1% among colorectal cancer cases. Methods: We have developed a system-based algorithm using centralized testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for four mismatched repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) as a screening method for all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients, followed by step wise testing of BRAF mutation, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, +/- microsatellite instability, and germline mutation. Results: From April 1, 2011, to July 11, 2012, we have screened 116 patients. IHC detected absent expression of at least one of the MMR proteins in 18 cases. Three cases showed missing expression of MSH2/MSH6 and the presence of a germline mutation in MSH6 was confirmed in two cases. The newest case is still being investigated for germline mutation. Of the remaining 15 cases, 10 showed the presence of BRAF V600E mutation, two showed hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter, and one showed germline MLH1 mutation. Two cases showed no BRAF V600E mutation, no MLH1 promoter hypermethylation or germline gene mutation. Overall, of 116 cases, three cases have confirmed Lynch syndrome with the detection of a germline mutation, two cases most likely have Lynch syndrome but without any detectable germline mutation of MLH1 or PMS2 using the current detecting methods. Conclusions: Our system-based screening algorithm using reflex immunohistochemistry of four MMR proteins has resulted in excellent detection rate of approximately 4% to 5% (5 out of 116 cases), consistent with the expected Lynch syndrome prevalence rate in the population. This represents a marked improvement over our previous family history-based approach in Lynch syndrome screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document