Molecular Analysis of Colorectal Cancers Suggests a High Frequency of Lynch Syndrome in Indonesia

There is about three times higher incidence of young patients <50 years old with colorectal cancer, termed EOCRC, in Indonesia as compared to Europe, the UK and USA. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of Lynch Syndrome (LS) in Indonesian CRC patients. The previously described Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test (N_LyST) was used in this project. N_LyST is a robust high-resolution melting (HRM)-based test that has shown 100% concordance with standard reference methods, including capillary electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. The test consisted of five mononucleotide microsatellite markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1), BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 region C promoter for methylation (using bisulphite-modified DNA). A total of 231 archival (2016–2019) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissues from CRC patients collected from Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta, Indonesia, were successfully tested and analysed. Among those, 44/231 (19.05%) were MSI, 25/231 (10.82%) were harbouring BRAF V600E mutation and 6/231 (2.60%) had MLH1 promoter methylation. Almost all—186/197 (99.45%)—MSS cases were MLH1 promoter unmethylated, while there were only 5/44 (11.36%) MSI cases with MLH1 promoter methylation. Similarly, only 9/44 (20.45%) of MSI cases were BRAF mutant. There were 50/231 (21.65%) EOCRC cases, with 15/50 (30%) regarded as MSI, as opposed to 29/181 (16.02%) within the older group. In total, 32/231 patients (13.85%) were classified as “Probable Lynch” (MSI, BRAF wildtype and MLH1 promoter unmethylated), which were enriched in EOCRC as compared to older patients (24% vs. 11.05%, p = 0.035). Nonetheless, 30/50 (76.00%) cases among the EOCRC cases were non-LS (sporadic) and were significantly associated with a left-sided tumour. The overall survival of both “Probable Lynch” and non-LS (sporadic) groups (n = 227) was comparable (p = 0.59), with follow up period of 0–1845 days/61.5 months. Stage, node status, histological grading and ECOG score were significantly associated with patient overall survival (p < 0.005), yet only ECOG was an independent factor for OS (HR: 4.38; 95% CI: 1.72–11.2; p = 0.002). In summary, this study is the first to reveal a potentially higher frequency of LS among CRC patients in Indonesia, which may partially contribute to the reported much higher number of EOCRC as compared to the incidence in the West.

Improved Microsatellite Instability detection in colorectal cancer patients by a combination of fourteen markers especially DNMT3a, DCD, and MT1X

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) results from genetic and epigenetic changes. Studying Microsatellite instability can help in treatment and categorization of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate whether 14 genomic markers consisting of BAT-62, BAT-60, BAT-59a, BAT-56a, BAT-56b, DCD, RIOX, RNF, FOXP, ACVR, CASP2, HSP110, MT1X, and DNMT3a can increase the detection rate of MSI in CRC. METHODS: Samples were stratified by pentaplex panel (Promega) and 14 markers using multiplex PCR and fragment analysis. In MSI+ samples, to identify the pattern of BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter methylation, ARMS-scorpion, and Methylation-Specific High-Resolution Melting Curve analysis, were applied respectively. RESULTS: Totally, 35 MSI+ cases identified by 14 marker panel. Only 18 cases of them were detected by both panels which are pentaplex and 14 marker. On the other hand, 17 new MSI+ cases just were identified by 14 markers panel. The highest diagnostic value among 14 markers is related to three makers, namely DCD, MT1X, and DNMT3a. In MSI+ cases, the rate of MLH1 promoter methylation was insignificant, (P value = 0.3979) while the rate of observed BRAFV600E mutation was significantly higher (P value = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Fourteen marker panel showed higher sensitivity in comparison with the pentaplex panel increasing the detection rate of MSI+ cases up to 1.94 fold. Three markers namely DNMT3a, DCD, and MT1X of 14 marker panel were the best among them showing excellent diagnostic value. A combination of these markers showed 100% sensitivity and specificity in the studied group. In contrary to the markers in the pentaplex panel, these markers had the ability to detect MSI without any bias for the clinicopathological features. These markers will help to identify more end-stage MSI+ tumors which are located distal colon.

Development of a Liquid Biopsy Based Purely Quantitative Digital Droplet PCR Assay for Detection of MLH1 Promoter Methylation in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1) promotor methylation is associated with microsatellite instability high colorectal cancer (CRC). The strong correlation between methylation status and cancer development and progression has led to a growing interest in the use of methylation markers in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for early cancer detection and longitudinal monitoring. As cancer-specific DNA methylation changes in body fluids are limited, it is particularly challenging to develop clinically applicable liquid biopsy methodologies with high sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of this study was to develop a fit-for-purpose methylation sensitive restriction enzyme (MSRE) based digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay to examine MLH1 promoter methylation in ctDNA in advanced CRC. Methods Primers and probes were designed to amplify CpG sites of the MLH1 promoter. Methylated and unmethylated control genomic DNA were sheared to mimic ctDNA and subjected to MSRE HpaII digestion. Plasma samples from 20 healthy donors and 28 CRC patients were analyzed with the optimized MSRE procedure using ddPCR. Results Using methylated and unmethylated controls, we optimized the conditions for HpaII enzyme digestion to ensure complete digestion and avoid false positives. Based on the results from the ddPCR assay using 1ng circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) input from healthy donors or CRC samples, ROC curves were generated with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.965. The optimal assay sensitivity and specificity was achieved when 8 positive droplets were used as acceptance criteria (78% sensitivity and 100% specificity). A tiered-based cutoff (20%, 50%, 80% percentile based) was applied to distinguish CRC samples with different methylation level.Conclusions Our study demonstrated that the liquid biopsy assay for MLH1 promoter methylation detection using purely quantitative ddPCR is a simple and ultrasensitive procedure that provides reliable methylation detection in ctDNA. The MSRE ddPCR approach can also be applied to other genes of interest where methylation patterns could reveal clinically relevant information for future clinical biomarker and/or companion diagnostic development.

Reporting Subclonal Immunohistochemical Staining of Mismatch Repair Proteins in Endometrial Carcinoma in the Times of Ever-Changing Guidelines

Context.— The current College of American Pathologists reporting guideline for mismatch repair protein (MMRP) immunohistochemistry for Lynch syndrome (LS) screening considers the presence of any positive nuclear staining as intact MMRP expression. This would include tumors with combined areas of subclonal retention and loss of MMRP staining. Objective.— To evaluate the clinical significance of reporting subclonal staining patterns of MMRP immunohistochemistry in endometrial carcinoma. Design.— We retrospectively reviewed 455 consecutive MMRP immunohistochemistry results of endometrial carcinoma in hysterectomy specimens from 2012 through 2017 and identified cases with subclonal MMRP staining. These results were correlated with the patient's personal and family history of LS-associated carcinoma, MLH1 promoter methylation status, and LS genetic testing. Results.— Subclonal staining of MMRP was seen in 48 of 455 cases (10.5%) on review. Thirty cases demonstrated isolated subclonal staining and were reported by pathologists as follows: subclonal (n = 5), complete MMRP loss (n = 4), and intact MMRP (n = 21). Eighteen cases had subclonal staining in combination with complete loss of other MMRP. Cases reported as subclonal or complete MMRP loss had appropriate clinical follow-up. Two of 2 cases with isolated subclonal MSH6 loss tested positive for LS. One of 3 cases with isolated subclonal MLH1/PMS2 loss was negative for MLH1 promoter methylation; LS genetic testing was not performed because of cost. Conclusions.— Our study reveals that LS germline mutation can be detected in endometrial carcinoma patients whose tumors display sole subclonal MMRP staining. Our results stress the importance of reporting subclonal staining patterns to ensure appropriate clinical follow-up.