scholarly journals Goals of care discussions for patients with blood cancers: Association of person, place, and time with end‐of‐life care utilization

Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oreofe O. Odejide ◽  
Hajime Uno ◽  
Anays Murillo ◽  
James A. Tulsky ◽  
Gregory A. Abel
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenna Mossman ◽  
Laura M. Perry ◽  
Leah E. Walsh ◽  
James Gerhart ◽  
Sonia Malhotra ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 775-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Guilherme L. Soares ◽  
Renato Vieira Gomes ◽  
André M. Japiassu

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) often receive poor-quality end-of-life care. This study aimed to identify trends in end-of-life care among patients with HM in Brazil. We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2015-2018) of patients who died with HM, using electronic medical records linked to health insurance databank, to evaluate outcomes consistent with health-care resource utilization at the end of life. Among 111 patients with HM, in the last 30 days of life, we found high rates of emergency department visits (67%, n = 75), intensive care unit admissions (56%, n = 62), acute renal replacement therapy (10%, n = 11), blood transfusions (45%, n = 50), and medical imaging utilization (59%, n = 66). Patients received an average of 13 days of inpatient care and the majority of them died in the hospital (53%, n = 58). We also found that almost 40% of patients (38%, n = 42) used chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. These patients were more likely to be male (64% vs 22%; P < .001), to receive blood transfusions (57% vs 38%; P = .05), and to die in the hospital (76% vs 39%; P = .009) than patients who did not use chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. This study suggests that patients with HM have high rates of health-care utilization at the end of life in Brazil. Patients who used chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life were more likely to receive blood transfusions and to die in the hospital.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Butler ◽  
Margaret L. Schwarze ◽  
Ronit Katz ◽  
Susan M. Hailpern ◽  
William Kreuter ◽  
...  

BackgroundLower extremity amputation is common among patients with ESRD, and often portends a poor prognosis. However, little is known about end-of-life care among patients with ESRD who undergo amputation.MethodsWe conducted a mortality follow-back study of Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD who died in 2002 through 2014 to analyze patterns of lower extremity amputation in the last year of life compared with a parallel cohort of beneficiaries without ESRD. We also examined the relationship between amputation and end-of-life care among the patients with ESRD.ResultsOverall, 8% of 754,777 beneficiaries with ESRD underwent at least one lower extremity amputation in their last year of life compared with 1% of 958,412 beneficiaries without ESRD. Adjusted analyses of patients with ESRD showed that those who had undergone lower extremity amputation were substantially more likely than those who had not to have been admitted to—and to have had prolonged stays in—acute and subacute care settings during their final year of life. Amputation was also associated with a greater likelihood of dying in the hospital, dialysis discontinuation before death, and less time receiving hospice services.ConclusionsNearly one in ten patients with ESRD undergoes lower extremity amputation in their last year of life. These patients have prolonged stays in acute and subacute health care settings and appear to have limited access to hospice services. These findings likely signal unmet palliative care needs among seriously ill patients with ESRD who undergo amputation as well as opportunities to improve their care.


Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (16) ◽  
pp. 2840-2848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Areej R. El-Jawahri ◽  
Gregory A. Abel ◽  
David P. Steensma ◽  
Thomas W. LeBlanc ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 590-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nneka N. Ufere ◽  
Jennifer L. Halford ◽  
Joshua Caldwell ◽  
Min Young Jang ◽  
Sunil Bhatt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1400-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nita Khandelwal ◽  
J. Randall Curtis ◽  
Vicki A. Freedman ◽  
Judith D. Kasper ◽  
Pedro Gozalo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 147-147
Author(s):  
Heather Leeper ◽  
Andrew Kamell

147 Background: 60% of Americans die in acute care hospitals and under 40% of advanced cancer patients have end-of-life care discussions with their health care providers. Didactic methods and tools to teach about symptom management, navigation of treatment decisions, code status, and end-of-life care decisions within an inpatient setting are a necessity to meet this high demand. Methods: A model of medical care systematically dividing clinical management decisions into escalating levels of medical care relative to illness severity, treatment goals, and code status was created. The model is illustrated as a pyramid with a base of symptom management as the initial level of medical care. The second level represents disease-focused medical care including antibiotics, disease-modifying drugs, and chemotherapy administration. Hospitalization with increasingly complex and invasive interventions represents the third level followed by critical illness care including ICU admission and vasopressors as the fourth level. Intubation comprises the fifth level and CPR forms the top of the pyramid. Results: This model has been used extensively at our institution in educating medical students, residents, fellows, and faculty. All groups reported it was helpful in understanding POLST forms, code status, and collaboratively developing appropriate goal-based care plans with their patients. Symptom management remaining as a non-negotiable foundation of care emphasizes its importance. This depiction of medical care may facilitate goals of care and code status discussions and is particularly helpful for determining appropriate care goals or options when considering de-escalation of medical therapies. Used implicitly or explicitly in patient and family discussions, it has facilitated decision-making and discerning the appropriateness of the overall treatment plan relative to patient goals of care. Conclusions: This model of care with its companion pyramid accommodate a wide range of clinical scenarios, is an effective, high yield didactic device for patients, families, and healthcare providers alike, and has applications as supportive tool to optimize goal-based clinical decision making in the context of serious illness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document