scholarly journals Parallel but separate inputs from limbic cortices to the mammillary bodies and anterior thalamic nuclei in the rat

2010 ◽  
Vol 518 (12) ◽  
pp. 2334-2354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas F. Wright ◽  
Jonathan T. Erichsen ◽  
Seralynne D. Vann ◽  
Shane M. O'Mara ◽  
John P. Aggleton
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 239821281772344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. Bubb ◽  
Lisa Kinnavane ◽  
John P. Aggleton

This review brings together current knowledge from tract tracing studies to update and reconsider those limbic connections initially highlighted by Papez for their presumed role in emotion. These connections link hippocampal and parahippocampal regions with the mammillary bodies, the anterior thalamic nuclei, and the cingulate gyrus, all structures now strongly implicated in memory functions. An additional goal of this review is to describe the routes taken by the various connections within this network. The original descriptions of these limbic connections saw their interconnecting pathways forming a serial circuit that began and finished in the hippocampal formation. It is now clear that with the exception of the mammillary bodies, these various sites are multiply interconnected with each other, including many reciprocal connections. In addition, these same connections are topographically organised, creating further subsystems. This complex pattern of connectivity helps explain the difficulty of interpreting the functional outcome of damage to any individual site within the network. For these same reasons, Papez’s initial concept of a loop beginning and ending in the hippocampal formation needs to be seen as a much more complex system of hippocampal–diencephalic–cingulate connections. The functions of these multiple interactions might be better viewed as principally providing efferent information from the posterior medial temporal lobe. Both a subcortical diencephalic route (via the fornix) and a cortical cingulate route (via retrosplenial cortex) can be distinguished. These routes provide indirect pathways for hippocampal interactions with prefrontal cortex, with the preponderance of both sets of connections arising from the more posterior hippocampal regions. These multi-stage connections complement the direct hippocampal projections to prefrontal cortex, which principally arise from the anterior hippocampus, thereby creating longitudinal functional differences along the anterior–posterior plane of the hippocampus.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 239821281987120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias L. Mathiasen ◽  
Rebecca C. Louch ◽  
Andrew D. Nelson ◽  
Christopher M. Dillingham ◽  
John P. Aggleton

The routes by which the hippocampal formation projects bilaterally to the anterior thalamic nuclei and mammillary bodies were examined in the mouse, rat, and macaque monkey. Despite using different methods and different species, the principal pattern remained the same. For both target areas, the contralateral hippocampal (subiculum) projections arose via efferents in the postcommissural fornix ipsilateral to the tracer injection, which then crossed hemispheres both in or just prior to reaching the target site within the thalamus or hypothalamus. Precommissural fornix fibres could not be followed to the target areas. There was scant evidence that the ventral hippocampal commissure or decussating fornix fibres contribute to these crossed subiculum projections. Meanwhile, a small minority of postsubiculum projections in the mouse were seen to cross in the descending fornix at the level of the caudal septum to join the contralateral postcommissural fornix before reaching the anterior thalamus and lateral mammillary nucleus on that side. Although the rodent anterior thalamic nuclei also receive nonfornical inputs from the subiculum and postsubiculum via the ipsilateral internal capsule, few, if any, of these projections cross the midline. It was also apparent that nuclei within the head direction system (anterodorsal thalamic nucleus, laterodorsal thalamic nucleus, and lateral mammillary nucleus) receive far fewer crossed hippocampal inputs than the other anterior thalamic or mammillary nuclei. The present findings increase our understanding of the fornix and its component pathways while also informing disconnection analyses involving the hippocampal formation and diencephalon.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1044-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kat Christiansen ◽  
Christopher M. Dillingham ◽  
Nicholas F. Wright ◽  
Richard C. Saunders ◽  
Seralynne D. Vann ◽  
...  

Neuroscience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 444 ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Vajihe Safari ◽  
Mohsen Nategh ◽  
Leila Dargahi ◽  
Mohammad Esmail Zibaii ◽  
Fariba Khodagholi ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Dalrymple-Alford ◽  
Anna M. Gifkins ◽  
Michael A. Christie

Three questions arising from Aggleton & Brown's target article are addressed. (1) Is there any benefit to considering the effects of partial lesions of the anterior thalamic nuclei (AT)? (2) Do the AT have a separate role in the proposed extended hippocampal system? (3) Should perirhinal cortex function be restricted to familiarity judgements?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document