Individual Subnuclei of the Rat Anterior Thalamic Nuclei Differently affect Spatial Memory and Passive Avoidance Tasks

Neuroscience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 444 ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Vajihe Safari ◽  
Mohsen Nategh ◽  
Leila Dargahi ◽  
Mohammad Esmail Zibaii ◽  
Fariba Khodagholi ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 81 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.P. Aggleton ◽  
P.R. Hunt ◽  
S. Nagle ◽  
N. Neave

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany E. Frost ◽  
Sean K. Martin ◽  
Matheus Cafalchio ◽  
Md Nurul Islam ◽  
John P. Aggleton ◽  
...  

SummaryHippocampal function relies on the anterior thalamic nuclei, but the reasons remain poorly understood. While anterior thalamic lesions disrupt parahippocampal spatial signalling, their impact on the subiculum is unknown, despite the importance of this area for hippocampal networks. We recorded subicular cells in rats with either permanent (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) or reversible (muscimol) anterior thalamic lesions. Bayesian and other statistical analyses underscored the notable absence of the diverse spatial signals normally found in the subiculum, including place cells, following permanent anterior thalamic lesions. Likewise, there was marked disruption of these diverse spatial signals during transient lesions. By contrast, permanent anterior thalamic lesions had no discernible impact on CA1 place fields. Anterior thalamic lesions reduced spatial alternation performance (permanently or reversibly) to chance, while leaving a non-spatial recognition memory task unaffected. These findings, which help explain why anterior thalamic damage is so deleterious for spatial memory, cast a new spotlight on the importance of subiculum function and reveal its dependence on anterior thalamic signalling.Graphical Abstract


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 239821281772344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. Bubb ◽  
Lisa Kinnavane ◽  
John P. Aggleton

This review brings together current knowledge from tract tracing studies to update and reconsider those limbic connections initially highlighted by Papez for their presumed role in emotion. These connections link hippocampal and parahippocampal regions with the mammillary bodies, the anterior thalamic nuclei, and the cingulate gyrus, all structures now strongly implicated in memory functions. An additional goal of this review is to describe the routes taken by the various connections within this network. The original descriptions of these limbic connections saw their interconnecting pathways forming a serial circuit that began and finished in the hippocampal formation. It is now clear that with the exception of the mammillary bodies, these various sites are multiply interconnected with each other, including many reciprocal connections. In addition, these same connections are topographically organised, creating further subsystems. This complex pattern of connectivity helps explain the difficulty of interpreting the functional outcome of damage to any individual site within the network. For these same reasons, Papez’s initial concept of a loop beginning and ending in the hippocampal formation needs to be seen as a much more complex system of hippocampal–diencephalic–cingulate connections. The functions of these multiple interactions might be better viewed as principally providing efferent information from the posterior medial temporal lobe. Both a subcortical diencephalic route (via the fornix) and a cortical cingulate route (via retrosplenial cortex) can be distinguished. These routes provide indirect pathways for hippocampal interactions with prefrontal cortex, with the preponderance of both sets of connections arising from the more posterior hippocampal regions. These multi-stage connections complement the direct hippocampal projections to prefrontal cortex, which principally arise from the anterior hippocampus, thereby creating longitudinal functional differences along the anterior–posterior plane of the hippocampus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document