Protective Effects of Anterior Thalamic Nuclei Stimulation on Hippocampal Neurons: A Promising Direction

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Shi ◽  
Jian Guo Zhang
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Laurens ◽  
Amada Abrego ◽  
Henry Cham ◽  
Briana Popeney ◽  
Yan Yu ◽  
...  

AbstractThe brain’s navigation system integrates multimodal cues to create a sense of position and orientation. Here we used a multimodal model to systematically assess how neurons in the anterior thalamic nuclei, retrosplenial cortex and anterior hippocampus of mice, as well as in the cingulum fiber bundle and the white matter regions surrounding the hippocampus, encode an array of navigational variables when animals forage in a circular arena. In addition to coding head direction, we found that some thalamic cells encode the animal’s allocentric position, similar to place cells. We also found that a large fraction of retrosplenial neurons, as well as some hippocampal neurons, encode the egocentric position of the arena’s boundary. We compared the multimodal model to traditional methods of head direction tuning and place field analysis, and found that the latter were inapplicable to multimodal regions such as the anterior thalamus and retrosplenial cortex. Our results draw a new picture of the signals carried and outputted by the anterior thalamus and retrosplenial cortex, offer new insights on navigational variables represented in the hippocampus and its vicinity, and emphasize the importance of using multimodal models to investigate neural coding throughout the navigation system.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 239821281772344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. Bubb ◽  
Lisa Kinnavane ◽  
John P. Aggleton

This review brings together current knowledge from tract tracing studies to update and reconsider those limbic connections initially highlighted by Papez for their presumed role in emotion. These connections link hippocampal and parahippocampal regions with the mammillary bodies, the anterior thalamic nuclei, and the cingulate gyrus, all structures now strongly implicated in memory functions. An additional goal of this review is to describe the routes taken by the various connections within this network. The original descriptions of these limbic connections saw their interconnecting pathways forming a serial circuit that began and finished in the hippocampal formation. It is now clear that with the exception of the mammillary bodies, these various sites are multiply interconnected with each other, including many reciprocal connections. In addition, these same connections are topographically organised, creating further subsystems. This complex pattern of connectivity helps explain the difficulty of interpreting the functional outcome of damage to any individual site within the network. For these same reasons, Papez’s initial concept of a loop beginning and ending in the hippocampal formation needs to be seen as a much more complex system of hippocampal–diencephalic–cingulate connections. The functions of these multiple interactions might be better viewed as principally providing efferent information from the posterior medial temporal lobe. Both a subcortical diencephalic route (via the fornix) and a cortical cingulate route (via retrosplenial cortex) can be distinguished. These routes provide indirect pathways for hippocampal interactions with prefrontal cortex, with the preponderance of both sets of connections arising from the more posterior hippocampal regions. These multi-stage connections complement the direct hippocampal projections to prefrontal cortex, which principally arise from the anterior hippocampus, thereby creating longitudinal functional differences along the anterior–posterior plane of the hippocampus.


Neuroscience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 444 ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Vajihe Safari ◽  
Mohsen Nategh ◽  
Leila Dargahi ◽  
Mohammad Esmail Zibaii ◽  
Fariba Khodagholi ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Dalrymple-Alford ◽  
Anna M. Gifkins ◽  
Michael A. Christie

Three questions arising from Aggleton & Brown's target article are addressed. (1) Is there any benefit to considering the effects of partial lesions of the anterior thalamic nuclei (AT)? (2) Do the AT have a separate role in the proposed extended hippocampal system? (3) Should perirhinal cortex function be restricted to familiarity judgements?


2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 5230-5238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha A. Jenkins ◽  
Rebecca Dias ◽  
Eman Amin ◽  
Malcolm W. Brown ◽  
John P. Aggleton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document