scholarly journals Hippocampal–diencephalic–cingulate networks for memory and emotion: An anatomical guide

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 239821281772344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. Bubb ◽  
Lisa Kinnavane ◽  
John P. Aggleton

This review brings together current knowledge from tract tracing studies to update and reconsider those limbic connections initially highlighted by Papez for their presumed role in emotion. These connections link hippocampal and parahippocampal regions with the mammillary bodies, the anterior thalamic nuclei, and the cingulate gyrus, all structures now strongly implicated in memory functions. An additional goal of this review is to describe the routes taken by the various connections within this network. The original descriptions of these limbic connections saw their interconnecting pathways forming a serial circuit that began and finished in the hippocampal formation. It is now clear that with the exception of the mammillary bodies, these various sites are multiply interconnected with each other, including many reciprocal connections. In addition, these same connections are topographically organised, creating further subsystems. This complex pattern of connectivity helps explain the difficulty of interpreting the functional outcome of damage to any individual site within the network. For these same reasons, Papez’s initial concept of a loop beginning and ending in the hippocampal formation needs to be seen as a much more complex system of hippocampal–diencephalic–cingulate connections. The functions of these multiple interactions might be better viewed as principally providing efferent information from the posterior medial temporal lobe. Both a subcortical diencephalic route (via the fornix) and a cortical cingulate route (via retrosplenial cortex) can be distinguished. These routes provide indirect pathways for hippocampal interactions with prefrontal cortex, with the preponderance of both sets of connections arising from the more posterior hippocampal regions. These multi-stage connections complement the direct hippocampal projections to prefrontal cortex, which principally arise from the anterior hippocampus, thereby creating longitudinal functional differences along the anterior–posterior plane of the hippocampus.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Pei ◽  
S (Yee T) Tasananukorn ◽  
M Wolff ◽  
JC Dalrymple-Alford

AbstractThe anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) form a nodal point within a hippocampal-cingulate-diencephalic memory system. ATN projections to different brain structures are conventionally viewed as distinct, but ATN neurons may send collaterals to multiple structures. The anteromedial subregion (AM) is the primary source of efferents to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Using a dual-retrograde neurotracer strategy, we discovered bifurcating AM neurons for tracers placed in the mPFC when paired with other regions. A semi-quantitative analysis found a high proportion of AM neurons (~36%) showed collateral projections when the mPFC was paired with dorsal subiculum (dSub); 20% were evident for mPFC paired with caudal retrosplenial cortex (cRSC); and 6% was found for mPFC and ventral hippocampal formation (vHF). About 10% of bifurcating AM neurons was also identified when the mPFC was not included, that is, for cRSC with dSub, and cRSC with vHF. Similar percentages of bifurcating neurons were also found within the anterior region of the adjacent nucleus reuniens (Re). The high frequency of bifurcating neurons suggests a new perspective for ATN function. These neurons would facilitate direct coordination among distal neural ensembles to support episodic memory and may explain why the ATN is a critical region for diencephalic amnesia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 239821281987120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias L. Mathiasen ◽  
Rebecca C. Louch ◽  
Andrew D. Nelson ◽  
Christopher M. Dillingham ◽  
John P. Aggleton

The routes by which the hippocampal formation projects bilaterally to the anterior thalamic nuclei and mammillary bodies were examined in the mouse, rat, and macaque monkey. Despite using different methods and different species, the principal pattern remained the same. For both target areas, the contralateral hippocampal (subiculum) projections arose via efferents in the postcommissural fornix ipsilateral to the tracer injection, which then crossed hemispheres both in or just prior to reaching the target site within the thalamus or hypothalamus. Precommissural fornix fibres could not be followed to the target areas. There was scant evidence that the ventral hippocampal commissure or decussating fornix fibres contribute to these crossed subiculum projections. Meanwhile, a small minority of postsubiculum projections in the mouse were seen to cross in the descending fornix at the level of the caudal septum to join the contralateral postcommissural fornix before reaching the anterior thalamus and lateral mammillary nucleus on that side. Although the rodent anterior thalamic nuclei also receive nonfornical inputs from the subiculum and postsubiculum via the ipsilateral internal capsule, few, if any, of these projections cross the midline. It was also apparent that nuclei within the head direction system (anterodorsal thalamic nucleus, laterodorsal thalamic nucleus, and lateral mammillary nucleus) receive far fewer crossed hippocampal inputs than the other anterior thalamic or mammillary nuclei. The present findings increase our understanding of the fornix and its component pathways while also informing disconnection analyses involving the hippocampal formation and diencephalon.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J Hamilton ◽  
John C Dalrymple-Alford

The anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN), a central node in a complex memory system, process spatial and temporal memory. Here, we show that ATN lesions do not affect acquisition of a simple odour discrimination or a simple object discrimination in a runway apparatus. The same procedures were used to test learning of an arbitrary association between non-spatial object-odour pairings (A+X or B+Y were rewarded; but not A+Y or B+X). If ATN lesions recapitulate hippocampal function, specifically CA1 function, then they should disrupt acquisition only when an explicit delay (i.e., a 10-second trace) is inserted between the odour and object. Acquisition was completely abolished by ATN lesions, irrespective of the presence of the temporal trace, and despite extensive training (50x12-trial sessions). Faster acquisition with the 10-second trace was found in the sham-lesion rats. During recall, 5 days after criterion, sham rats but not ATN-lesion rats showed elevated Zif268 expression in hippocampal CA1 for the trace compared to no-trace condition; both sham and lesion rats tested in the trace condition showed increased IEG expression in the superficial layers of the prefrontal cortex and retrosplenial cortex. ATN lesions markedly reduced Zif268 expression in the prefrontal cortex and retrosplenial cortex. This is the first evidence that ATN lesions impair non-spatial paired-associate tasks. The findings suggest that the ATN influence memory beyond time and space, and constitute a critical neural structure for learning arbitrary associations even in the task version that is not disrupted by hippocampal lesions.


Hippocampus ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 977-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Dillingham ◽  
Jonathan T. Erichsen ◽  
Shane M. O'Mara ◽  
John P. Aggleton ◽  
Seralynne D. Vann

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Yamawaki ◽  
Xiaojian Li ◽  
Laurie Lambot ◽  
Lynn Y. Ren ◽  
Jelena Radulovic ◽  
...  

AbstractDorsal hippocampus, retrosplenial cortex (RSC), and anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) interact to mediate diverse cognitive functions, but the cellular basis for these interactions is unclear. We hypothesized a long-range circuit converging in layer 1 (L1) of RSC, based on the pathway anatomy of GABAergic CA1 retrosplenial-projecting (CA1-RP) neurons and thalamo-restrosplenial projections from ATN. We find that CA1→RSC projections stem from GABAergic neurons with a distinct morphology, electrophysiology, and molecular profile, likely corresponding to recently described Ntng1-expressing hippocampal interneurons. CA1-RP neurons monosynaptically inhibit L5 pyramidal neurons, principal outputs of RSC, via potent GABAergic synapses onto apical tuft dendrites in L1. These inhibitory inputs align precisely with L1-targeting thalamocortical excitatory inputs from ATN, particularly the anteroventral nucleus, forming a convergent circuit whereby CA1 inhibition can intercept ATN excitation to co-regulate RSC activity. Excitatory axons from subiculum, in contrast, innervate proximal dendrites in deeper layers. Short-term synaptic plasticity differs at each connection. Chemogenetically abrogating inhibitory CA1→RSC or excitatory ATN→RSC connections oppositely affects the encoding of contextual fear memory. Collectively, our findings identify multiple cellular mechanisms underlying hippocampo-thalamo-retrosplenial interactions, establishing CA1 RSC-projecting neurons as a distinct class with long-range axons that target apical tuft dendrites, and delineating an unusual cortical circuit in the RSC specialized for integrating long-range inhibition and thalamocortical excitation.


Author(s):  
Hans Markowitsch ◽  
Angelica Staniloiu

The historical roots of memory research—mainly from the period between 1870 and 1920—are described with emphasis on human memory. First, data from experimental psychology are reviewed; thereafter principal contributions from the old traditions of psychiatry and psychoanalysis are given and then relations between brain tissue damage and memory deficits are outlined. Experimental as well as clinical studies of that time already provided evidence for theoretical ideas on memory systems, which resemble those en vogue today. Furthermore, significant and still valid findings were reported on the contribution of bottleneck structures of the limbic system for mempry encoding. Among these, the mammillary bodies, thalamic nuclei, and the medial temporal lobe were most consistently mentioned. Furthermore, early findings from psychiatric patients revealed similar forms of dissociative states as found presently and indicated that these disease conditions occur much more in young than in older adults.


2010 ◽  
Vol 518 (12) ◽  
pp. 2334-2354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas F. Wright ◽  
Jonathan T. Erichsen ◽  
Seralynne D. Vann ◽  
Shane M. O'Mara ◽  
John P. Aggleton

2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 1441-1471 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Aggleton

Three emerging strands of evidence are helping to resolve the causes of the anterograde amnesia associated with damage to the diencephalon. First, new anatomical studies have refined our understanding of the links between diencephalic and temporal brain regions associated with amnesia. These studies direct attention to the limited numbers of routes linking the two regions. Second, neuropsychological studies of patients with colloid cysts confirm the importance of at least one of these routes, the fornix, for episodic memory. By combining these anatomical and neuropsychological data strong evidence emerges for the view that damage to hippocampal—mammillary body—anterior thalamic interactions is sufficient to induce amnesia. A third development is the possibility that the retrosplenial cortex provides an integrating link in this functional system. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that the retrosplenial cortex may suffer “covert” pathology (i.e., it is functionally lesioned) following damage to the anterior thalamic nuclei or hippocampus. This shared indirect “lesion” effect on the retrosplenial cortex not only broadens our concept of the neural basis of amnesia but may also help to explain the many similarities between temporal lobe and diencephalic amnesia.


1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Aggleton ◽  
Malcolm W. Brown

The goal of our target article was to review a number of emerging facts about the effects of limbic damage on memory in humans and animals, and about divisions within recognition memory in humans. We then argued that this information can be synthesized to produce a new view of the substrates of episodic memory. The key pathway in this system is from the hippocampus to the anterior thalamic nuclei. There seems to be a general agreement that the importance of this pathway has previously been underestimated and that it warrants further study. At the same time, a number of key questions remain. These concern the relationship of this system to another temporal-lobe/diencephalic system that contributes to recognition, and the relationship of these systems to prefrontal cortex activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document