scholarly journals Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Examining the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez ◽  
Nazim Hussain ◽  
Sana‐Akbar Khan ◽  
Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Reports

Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and performance with the moderating role of board equity ownership: Evidence from Indonesia’s oil palm companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Asna Asna
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Oil Palm ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

The Oil Palm Companies is one of the highest contributions towards Indonesia economic development. However, the company performance in the oil palm companies is far from expectation which is related to how they responsible on their shareholders as well as stakeholders. Thus, the study purpose is to examine the relations between corporate governance mechanisms, corporate social responsibility and board equity ownership on performance in Indonesia’s Oil Palm Companies. The findings highlight a positive relationship between board equity ownership, corporate social responsibility and company performance. Furthermore, the moderating role of board equity ownership has a significant positive on the relationship between independence director and company performance as well as corporate social responsibility. The relationship between female director and company performance shows the same result with the interaction of board equity ownership. Currently studies have found that corporate governance mechanisms, corporate social responsibility have significant effect on company performance. Nevertheless, this evidence showed that direct relationship between corporate governance, social responsibility and company performance have mix results. Admittedly, the indirect relationship revealed that board equity ownership contributes significant effect on the relations between corporate governance, social responsibility and company performance particularly in Indonesia’s oil palm companies. Based on the author knowledge, a few studies have been done in oil palm companies which it provides a prominent issue in corporate governance mechanism particularly on board equity ownership which majority is held by family member ownership. Keywords Corporate governance, social responsibility, board equity ownership, company performance

scholarly journals Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Kuwaiti Listed Firms

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Mejbel Al-Saidi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Large Shareholders ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

Firms must maintain a balance between their performance and corporate social responsibility (CSR). This study examines the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and the CSR of firms listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE) within the framework of agency theory. Using a sample of 86 firms in 2019, this study explored five corporate governance mechanisms (i.e., ownership concentration by large shareholders, ownership concentration by government, board size, board independence, and family directors) and five control variables (i.e., debt, firm size, firm age, profitability, and industry type). The study used the index checklist to measure CSR and found that ownership concentration by large shareholders, ownership concentration by government, and board size affect a firm’s social responsibility while other variables have no impact. This study was the first to examine the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on corporate social responsibility in Kuwait after introducing the new corporate governance rules, and the findings will help Kuwait’s government, firms, and investors evaluate the current rules and improve CSR requirements.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Society Disclosure: The Application of Legitimacy Theory

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 660-678
Author(s):  
Joanne Shaza Janang ◽  
Corina Joseph ◽  
Roshima Said
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Legitimacy Theory ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Social

It is important for companies to adhere to society’s values by engaging in corporate social responsibility activities to remain legitimate, which in turn, translated into disclosures in annual reports. Corporate governance mechanisms have been used as explanatory factors in determining the level of disclosures. This paper aims to determine the influence of corporate governance mechanisms on the society disclosure in Malaysian companies’ annual reports using the legitimacy theory. The level of society disclosure is examined against the Modified Society Disclosure Index (MoSDI), which was developed based on the society indicatorof Global Reporting Initiative Version 4.0, preliminary observation on the 2016 NACRA winners’ annual reports and past literature. The analysis involved 234 top Malaysian companies’ annual reports from 2014 to 2016. The results found that audit committee, independent directors, and size are significantly associated withthe level of society disclosure. By complying with good corporate governance practice, awareness can be raised and preventive measures can be taken in addressing society’s issues through proper society disclosure.The legitimacy gap can be reduced via the society disclosure.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies: A Systemic Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 36-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Nikolić ◽  
Dejana Zlatanović
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Soft Systems Methodology ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Systems Methodology ◽  
Soft Systems ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Social

AbstractRespecting the importance of corporate governance (CG), particularly various corporate governance mechanisms for improving corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities, the paper highlights relevant CG–CSR synergies from the perspective of systems thinking. The paper further aims to demonstrate the ways in which selected systems methodologies can support CG–CSR synergies. Accordingly, we selected appropriate systems methodologies, such as dialectical systems theory, soft systems methodology, and system dynamics. We defined the dialectical system, consisting of essential corporate governance mechanisms, which contribute to CSR; we also identified the key stakeholders and their perceptions of CG–CSR relations through CATWOE analysis; thus, the appropriate root definition and conceptual model, including the activities that are relevant for CG–CSR relations, were developed. Developed systemic framework provided a relevant methodological support to highlight the various issues of corporate governance, such as institutional framework, market for corporate control, ownership structure, board structure, and their contribution to CSR.

scholarly journals The Impact of Corporate Governance on Corruption Disclosure in European Listed Firms through the Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 6479
Author(s):  
María Inmaculada Alonso Carrillo ◽  
Alba María Priego De La Cruz ◽  
Montserrat Nuñez Chicharro
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Outside Directors ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

The publication of Directive 2014/95/EU represents an important milestone related to the disclosure of non-financial information. This fact together with the role of the corporate governance guide firms towards achieving of an ethical, transparent, and responsible behavior. To contribute towards the understanding of this issue, this study investigates the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility disclosure, namely, in corruption aspects relating to Directive 2014/95/EU. In so doing, a multiple regression analysis was carried out on a panel data sample of 198 European listed firms that are part of the EuroStoxx 200 index, in a studied period from 2014 to 2017. The findings reveal that outside directors and CEO duality impact positively and significantly on corruption disclosure. Therefore, this paper contributes to the existing research on corporate social responsibility disclosure, specifically, to the corruption disclosure literature by studying the corporate governance mechanisms that enhance these practices.

Complementary or Substitutive Effects? Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Corporate Social Responsibility

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 2716-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-Yong Oh ◽  
Young Kyun Chang ◽  
Tae-Yeol Kim
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Agency Theory ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Social

Management researchers have investigated how corporate governance mechanisms influence corporate social responsibility (CSR). The previous literature has been largely based on agency theory, which emphasizes the roles of effective monitoring and incentive alignment, but the empirical evidence has been mixed. This inconsistency may result from the assumption that each governance mechanism functions independently, even though they interact with one another to affect CSR. On the basis of a perspective of bundle of governance mechanisms, we examined whether multiple governance mechanisms act as complements or substitutes for each other in promoting CSR. Using a panel sample of U.S. firms for the years 2004 to 2010, we found that multiple governance mechanisms mainly act as substitutes to promote CSR. Our findings suggest that a similar level of CSR can be achieved with different combinations of governance mechanisms. Our study contributes to the fields of both corporate governance and CSR in theory and practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document