Disciplinary Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Eric Lyerly
Keyword(s):  
1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Jean Baldwin ◽  
Nancy B. Ramos ◽  
L Eugene Baldwin
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Nelson Burnett

Overthe last two decades historians of early modern Europe have adopted the paradigm of confessionalization to describe the religious, political, and cultural changes that occurred in the two centuries following the Reformation.1As an explanatory model confessionalization has often been portrayed as the religious and ecclesiastical parallel to the secular and political process of social discipline, as formulated by Gerhard Oestreich.2In its simplest form, the process of confessional and social discipline is depicted as hierarchical and unidirectional: the impulse to discipline and control came from the secular and ecclesiastical authorities, and the laity, particularly the peasants at the bottom of the hierarchy, had little possibility of exerting counterpressures on those seeking to shape their beliefs and behavior. The inevitable result of the disciplinary process was the gradual suppression of popular culture and the imposition of new standards of belief and behavior on the subjects of the territorial state.


2014 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Frances E. Cain ◽  
Phil Davignon ◽  
Thomas R. Henzel ◽  
Andrea Ciccone ◽  
Aaron Young

ABSTRACT State medical boards have long recognized the importance of evaluating the ongoing knowledge and competence of licensed physicians under a variety of circumstances. Before granting or renewing a license, it may be necessary for state boards to evaluate physicians as part of a disciplinary process or following a period of inactivity for either disciplinary or non-disciplinary reasons. The Post-Licensure Assessment System (PLAS), a joint program of the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), has played a role in assisting state boards with evaluating physicians' basic medical knowledge in all of these circumstances by providing the Special Purpose Examination (SPEX). While SPEX has been administered since 1988, there has not been a nationally published study summarizing the characteristics of physicians taking the exam and their examination pass rates. To address this, we examined physicians who took SPEX between 2003 and 2011, and the outcomes of their exams. Our research demonstrates that the majority of examinees take SPEX for non-disciplinary reasons, with those who take SPEX for disciplinary reasons having lower pass rates. Future research should focus on evaluating the ultimate outcomes for physicians taking SPEX, including the ability to attain and retain a license to practice medicine.


1988 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 10-53
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Steele ◽  
Kathleen Hatch
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Clarissa J. Humphreys ◽  
Graham J. Towl
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 187 (7) ◽  
pp. 260-261

Following on from the RCVS’ series discussing key recommendations from its Legislation Working Party (LWP), RCVS registrar and director of legal services Eleanor Ferguson considers short-term proposals for reforming the RCVS disciplinary process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document