scholarly journals Population genetics of Bull Trout ( Salvelinus confluentus ) in the upper Athabasca River basin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma K. T. Carroll ◽  
Steven M. Vamosi

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma K. T. Carroll ◽  
Steven M. Vamosi

AbstractAcross its native range, Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) extent and abundance are in decline due to historic overharvest and habitat degradation. Because Bull Trout are dependent on extensively connected, cold, clean headwater habitats, fragmentation from land use changes causes difficulty when determining the true extent and health of their populations, with Bull Trout of Alberta’s Eastern Slope region being no exception. Across this region, 431 Bull Trout from 20 sites were sampled from the Athabasca and Saskatchewan River basins and compared using 10 microsatellite loci to characterize within- and among-population genetic variation. The Saskatchewan and Athabasca River basins contained similar levels of heterozygosity but were differentiated from one another. Within the Athabasca River basin, five genetically differentiated clusters were found. Additionally, no isolation-by-distance pattern was observed between these sites. These results suggest these populations have ample genetic diversity, but genetic differentiation should be considered when deciding whether and how to alter connectivity between populations.





2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (11) ◽  
pp. 2431-2442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis Ripley ◽  
Garry Scrimgeour ◽  
Mark S Boyce

We examined relations between cumulative levels of forest harvesting and density of road networks on the occurrence and abundance of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Kakwa River Basin, Alberta. Logistic regression models showed that bull trout occurrence was positively related to stream wetted width but negatively related to percent fines, percent cobbles, reach slope, and the cumulative area of the subbasin harvested and road density. Results from zero-inflated Poisson regression models typically showed that bull trout abundance was positively related to elevation and negatively related to stream width, percent fines, percent cobble, slope, and levels of forest harvesting. Using the negative relation between bull trout occurrence and percentage of subbasins harvested derived from the most parsimonious logistic regression model, we forecasted that forest harvesting over the next 20 years is projected to result in the local extirpation of bull trout from 24% to 43% of stream reaches that currently support bull trout in the Kakwa River Basin.



2021 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 100847
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Ghaderpour ◽  
Tijana Vujadinovic ◽  
Quazi K. Hassan




2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 4272-4293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung-Il Eum ◽  
Dibike Yonas ◽  
Terry Prowse


1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Donald ◽  
David J. Alger

Indigenous lacustrine populations of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and lake trout (S. namaycush) are spatially separated within the southern part of the zone of distributional overlap (northern Montana, southwestern Alberta, and east-central British Columbia). In this area, lake trout occurred primarily in mountain lakes of 1032–1500 m elevation, while bull trout were found primarily in lakes between 1500 and 2200 m. Introductions of lake trout in the twentieth century and data obtained from beyond the study area indicated that both fishes can establish significant allopatric populations (more than 5% of the catch) in large, deep lakes (>8 ha in area and >8 m deep) over a wide elevation range. We tested the hypothesis that lake trout displace or exclude bull trout from lakes by determining the outcome of introductions of lake trout into two lakes that supported indigenous bull trout. Lake trout were introduced into Bow Lake in 1964, and by 1992 the bull trout population was decimated there and in another lake (Hector) situated 15 km downstream. Thus, lake trout can displace bull trout and may prevent bull trout from becoming established in certain low-elevation lakes. Population age-structure analyses also suggest that lake trout adversely affected bull trout. Bull trout populations in sympatry with lake trout, including the one extirpated from Hector Lake, had few old fish (18% were more than 5 years old; N = 40 fish from three lakes) compared with allopatric populations (49% were more than 5 years old; N = 235 fish from seven lakes). Niche overlap and the potential for competition between the two char species were substantial. In lakes with trophic structure ranging from simple to complex, bull trout and lake trout fed on similar foods and had similar ecological efficiencies (growth rates). Predation by lake trout on bull trout was not documented during the study.



Ecohydrology ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark K. Taylor ◽  
Caleb T. Hasler ◽  
Scott G. Hinch ◽  
Bronwen Lewis ◽  
Dana C. Schmidt ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document