scholarly journals Validation of (not‐historical) large‐event near‐fault ground‐motion simulations for use in civil engineering applications

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floriana Petrone ◽  
Norman Abrahamson ◽  
David McCallen ◽  
Mamun Miah
MethodsX ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 100725
Author(s):  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Shibo Zhang ◽  
Zhe Zhang

2020 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 106289
Author(s):  
Lizhong Jiang ◽  
Jian Yu ◽  
Wangbao Zhou ◽  
Wangji Yan ◽  
Zhipeng Lai ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhat Kumar ◽  
◽  
Ashwani Kumar ◽  
Ashok Deota Pandey ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Chunyang Liu ◽  
Peng Sun ◽  
Ruofan Shi

This paper proposes two kinds of arrangements of buckling-restrained brace dampers to strengthen soft-first-storey structures locally. Two types of near-fault ground motion, with and without pulse, were selected for a study of the seismic response characteristics of soft-first-storey structures with and without buckling-restrained brace dampers, and the effects of different bracing arrangements on improving the seismic performance of soft-first-storey structures were recognized. The results show that, compared with pulse-free ground motion, near-fault pulsed ground motion results in a more severe seismic response in soft-first-storey frame structures, leading to more serious and rapid destruction of the main structure. Buckling-restrained brace dampers have an obvious energy dissipation effect, play a better role in protecting the main structure, and have good practicality. Compared with structures in which the buckling-restrained brace dampers are arranged only on the bottommost layer, the bottom-four-layer-support structure is more advantageous in terms of seismic performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document