Building structures around the world have been designed using various framing methods. In Japan, the two-way moment-resisting frame structure, which is designed as a 3D seismic frame with beams connected to the columns, with moment connections in both directions, is traditionally constructed. In contrast, in the United States and many other countries in high seismic regions, the one-way moment-resisting frame structure, which is designed as separate seismic and gravity frame structure with only a few expensive moment connections in seismic frames, is typically constructed. Structures with these different framing systems are likely to exhibit different seismic response and collapse mechanism when subjected to large earthquake excitation. However, the simulation up to complete collapse has almost not been conducted and safety margin to complete collapse of these different framing systems has not been sufficiently understood. In this study, seismic simulation of U.S. and Japanese type three-story steel moment-resisting frame structures is conducted using general-purpose finite element analysis program. Practical macro models used for the simulation are based on beam and shell elements. It is found that composite effects of floor slab accelerate column yielding in both U.S. and Japanese type steel frame structures and drift concentration may occur at relatively small ground motion level and eventually result in complete collapse.
Risk Analysis of Three-storey Reinforced Concrete Moment-resisting Frame Structures Using Performance-based Wind Engineering
