Integrating micro metal‐air batteries in lateral flow test for point‐of‐care applications

Author(s):  
Yifei Wang ◽  
Wending Pan ◽  
Shijing Luo ◽  
Xiaolong Zhao ◽  
Holly Y. H. Kwok ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1354-1361
Author(s):  
Hyun‐Duck Kim ◽  
Chang‐Soo Lee ◽  
Hyun‐Jae Cho ◽  
Sumin Jeon ◽  
Young‐Nim Choi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Kainz ◽  
Bastian J. Breiner ◽  
Susanna M. Früh ◽  
Tobias Hutzenlaub ◽  
Roland Zengerle ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite the widespread application of point-of-care lateral flow tests, the viscosity dependence of these assay results remains a significant challenge. Here, we employ centrifugal microfluidic flow control through the nitrocellulose membrane of the strip to eliminate the viscosity bias. The key feature is the balancing of the sample flow into the cassette of the lateral flow test with the air flow out of the cassette. A viscosity-independent flow rate of 3.01 ± 0.18 µl/min (±6%) is demonstrated for samples with viscosities ranging from 1.1 mPas to 24 mPas, a factor greater than 20. In a model human IgG lateral flow assay, signal-intensity shifts caused by varying the sample viscosity from 1.1 mPas to 2.3 mPas could be reduced by more than 84%.


Lab on a Chip ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Paterson ◽  
Balakrishnan Raja ◽  
Vinay Mandadi ◽  
Blane Townsend ◽  
Miles Lee ◽  
...  

Time-gated imaging on a smartphone of a lateral flow test strip run with persistent luminescent nanophosphors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Miroslav Pohanka

Analytical devices for point-of-care diagnoses are highly desired and would improve quality of life when first diagnoses are made early and pathologies are recognized soon. Lateral flow tests (LFTs) are such tools that can be easily performed without specific equipment, skills, or experiences. This review is focused on the use of LFT in point-of-care diagnoses. The principle of the assay is explained, and new materials like nanoparticles for labeling, new recognition molecules for interaction with an analyte, and new additional instrumentation like signal scaling by a smartphone camera are described and discussed. Advantages of the LFT devices as well as their limitations are described and discussed here considering actual papers that are properly cited.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. e0241420
Author(s):  
Finn N. Loose ◽  
André Breitbach ◽  
Ivo Bertalan ◽  
Dana Rüster ◽  
Uwe Truyen ◽  
...  

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1043
Author(s):  
Tove Hoffman ◽  
Linda Kolstad ◽  
Bengt Rönnberg ◽  
Åke Lundkvist

The potential of rapid point-of-care (POC) tests has been subject of doubt due to an eventual risk of production errors. The aim was therefore to evaluate the two separate production lots of a commercial POC lateral flow test, intended for the detection of IgM and IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S1). Control samples consisted of serum from individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and pre-COVID-19 negative sera gathered from a biobank. The presence of anti-S1 IgM/IgG in the sera was verified by an in-house Luminex-based serological assay (COVID-19 SIA). One hundred samples were verified as positive for anti-S1 IgG and 74 for anti-S1 IgM. Two hundred samples were verified as negative for anti-S1 IgM/IgG. For the two lots of the POC-test, the sensitivities were 93.2% and 87.8% for IgM and 93.0% and 100% for IgG. The specificities were 100% for IgM and 99.5% for IgG. The positive predictive value was 100% for IgM and 98.9% and 99.0% for IgG. The negative predictive value was 97.6% and 95.7% for IgM, and 96.6% and 100% for IgG. The evaluated POC-test is suitable to assess anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgM and IgG, as a measure of previous virus exposure on an individual level. The external validation of separate lots of rapid POC-tests is encouraged to ensure high sensitivity before market introduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document